It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Space shuttle captures strange anomoly

page: 1
4

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 22 2011 @ 03:04 AM
link   
Interesting anomoly captured on rhe Shuttle camera recently. There are some clever people on here who can maybe explain this.



edit on 22-8-2011 by Gemwolf because: Removed all caps title




posted on Aug, 22 2011 @ 03:06 AM
link   
Another enhancement





posted on Aug, 22 2011 @ 03:08 AM
link   
IMAGE LINK

www.photoweeklyonline.com...
edit on 22-8-2011 by inhomike because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 22 2011 @ 03:11 AM
link   
Looks like a long giant pyramid floating in space.

Or some sort of particle wave.

???



posted on Aug, 22 2011 @ 03:11 AM
link   
reflection from the window???

EDIT: your link doesnt work, can you fix it so we can all take a better look

edit on 22-8-2011 by loves a conspiricy because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 22 2011 @ 03:17 AM
link   
reply to post by loves a conspiricy
 


That should do it pal, just getting the hang of ATS format

edit on 22-8-2011 by inhomike because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 22 2011 @ 03:18 AM
link   
Cool....its 100% reflection.

The link you posted is far better than those zoomed in ones....southern lights, filmed from inside the craft...i think the pics you have posted are VERY deceptive.


edit on 22-8-2011 by loves a conspiricy because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 22 2011 @ 03:19 AM
link   
reply to post by loves a conspiricy
 


You are probably right, a light anomoly, beautiful images though. However, I would assume NASA photographic technology would be advanced enough to counter act such an anomoly?

edit on 22-8-2011 by inhomike because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 22 2011 @ 03:25 AM
link   
Reflection from inside the shuttle.



posted on Aug, 22 2011 @ 03:30 AM
link   

Originally posted by inhomike
reply to post by loves a conspiricy
 


You are probably right, a light anomoly, beautiful images though. However, I would assume NASA photographic technology would be advanced enough to counter act such an anomoly?

edit on 22-8-2011 by inhomike because: (no reason given)


It wouldnt matter what type of camera you used, if there was a reflection in the window it will show with any camera

Heres another more obvious example



edit on 22-8-2011 by loves a conspiricy because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 22 2011 @ 03:34 AM
link   
reply to post by DoctorBrown
 


Assuming the camera is "inside" the shuttle, we then have a sophisticated NASA camera system that can not counter act reflection? Or is it a digi shot from an onboard crew member perhaps?



posted on Aug, 22 2011 @ 03:36 AM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Aug, 22 2011 @ 03:38 AM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Aug, 22 2011 @ 03:42 AM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Aug, 22 2011 @ 05:46 AM
link   
reply to post by inhomike
 


Well technicaly speaking I think that all the cameras that are within the craft would be weilded directly by the crew. I very much doubt that they have floating zero gee drones floating about the cabin and crawlspaces of the shuttle, clicking snaps out of the windows all day.

The external cameras might be free of the reflection issue to some degree, but I do not believe that this is a shot from one of those.



posted on Aug, 22 2011 @ 07:55 AM
link   
It's most definately a reflection, a heat shield or an Imperial crusier.



posted on Aug, 22 2011 @ 08:50 AM
link   
The time/date hack of "recently" is not adequate for any independent verification -- as a rule
youtube videos of 'space UFOs' suppress such information, perhaps to sabotage checking up
on the context of the images. Typical of falsification techniques.



posted on Aug, 22 2011 @ 01:04 PM
link   
Something is wrong with this image posted by photoweeklyonline as well as
the huffingtonpost and other websites, image credited as NASA iss028e016368.
The original iss028e016368 by NASA is different !! Check the original in the
NASA website here.
spaceflight.nasa.gov...

Now the comparison with both images credited as NASA iss028e016368, the original
and the other one on flickr where was taken by photoweekly and the other ones. They
are not the same.




new topics

top topics



 
4

log in

join