The Reinforced Concrete of the Pentagon

Originally posted by waypastvne
reply to post by Yankee451

 

Poured structural concrete does not come 8" x 4" x 2 1/2" sizes. Bricks do.

2 layers of brick and a plaster wall. No concrete. No rebar.

Back in my youth we had these things called "Vinyl Records" that we would listen to recorded music from. There was a diamond stylus that would scrape the grooves in the vinyl, and then project the sound over an amplifier and speakers. If a groove became damaged, the record would keep repeating the same thing, the same thing, the same thing, the same thing....

You are like a broken record.

You say:

"Poured structural concrete does not come 8" x 4" x 2 1/2" sizes. Bricks do.

2 layers of brick and a plaster wall. No concrete. No rebar."


I say:

Therefore, these images are not of the C ring light well.

Rinse, and repeat.

Originally posted by Yankee451
Back in my youth we had these things called "Vinyl Records" that we would listen to recorded music from. There was a diamond stylus that would scrape the grooves in the vinyl, and then project the sound over an amplifier and speakers. If a groove became damaged, the record would keep repeating the same thing, the same thing, the same thing, the same thing....

In my day we had a thing called a whoopee cushion. They looked like a balloon but when you sat on them they made a sound just like a truther does when he post crap on the internet.

2 layers of bricks, plaster wall. No concrete. No rebar

reply to post by waypastvne


So this means whatever photos we were shown of the alleged punchout hole, couldn't be from the C ring light well.

From Pentagon Building Performance Report - page 6

The perimeter exterior walls of Ring E are faced in limestone
and backed with unreinforced brick infilled in the concrete
frame. Nearly all remaining exterior walls are 10 in. concrete.The
first story at AE Drive is brick infilled in the concrete frame, with
no windows.The concrete walls have 5 by 7 ft openings for windows
and include columns built in as pilasters, corresponding to
column locations below, and girders reinforced within the wall.
Figure 2.10 is an elevation at a typical light well wall.

fire.nist.gov...

Operative sentence -

The first story at AE Drive is brick infilled in the concrete frame, with
no windows.

AE Drive is internal roadway which runs between C Ring and B Ring inside the Pentagon

Picture of C Ring Wall - notice the concrete frame on the right



Its a brick wall.......

reply to post by thedman

Its a brick wall......

i am not disputing the wall shown in the picture, I am disputing the claim that the picture is of the C ring light well.

reply to post by Yankee451


Do you have a problem with reading comprehension ?

The picture is of the C Ring wall taken from A-E Drive . It is not of a light well

The light wells only go from the roof to the top of the 2nd floor. There are no light wells on the lowest floors

reply to post by Yankee451

So this means whatever photos we were shown of the alleged punchout hole, couldn't be from the C ring light well.

Why is it that you argue every single fact?

Here is another angle.




Zoom in.
I guess you think they are still planting evidence while the fire hoses are still going on in the background.

This page has a few hi res pictures of the hole.

hi res

Thats a awful lot of pictures from different angles of something they are trying to cover up. Dont you think?

Or is it your suspicions are flat out wrong?

Originally posted by thedman
reply to post by Yankee451

 

Do you have a problem with reading comprehension ?

I must, because when I see these books, I repeatedly see stuff like this:

The president was "emphatic in his disapproval of the use of brick, either red or cream colored," Somefvell reported. The walls would be made of architectural concrete.

Pardon my ignorance and thanks for the information.

reply to post by samkent


Thanks for the information.

Originally posted by samkent
reply to post by Yankee451

 

So this means whatever photos we were shown of the alleged punchout hole, couldn't be from the C ring light well.

Why is it that you argue every single fact?

I wasn't aware I was.

Originally posted by samkent
This page has a few hi res pictures of the hole.

hi res

Thats a awful lot of pictures from different angles of something they are trying to cover up. Dont you think?

Or is it your suspicions are flat out wrong?

Yeah, can't believe I missed those.

You guys sure are quick to correct me when I'm wrong. I wonder why you don't come around on my other threads?

Originally posted by thedman
reply to post by Yankee451

 

Do you have a problem with reading comprehension ?

The picture is of the C Ring wall taken from A-E Drive . It is not of a light well

The light wells only go from the roof to the top of the 2nd floor. There are no light wells on the lowest floors

Haha...yeah, that one's my favorite. The tire is a nice touch.

So Thedman...what is the take home lesson here?

When I'm wrong, people like you and other folks will prove me wrong. And when proven wrong, I'll admit it.

I just can't figure out why you guys don't do the same with my other threads.

reply to post by Yankee451


When it says a 50 year design life that usually means the minimum they expect it to last not how long it will take!

Why do some think that's how long it will take.

reply to post by wmd_2008


the point of this thread has already been made

reply to post by Yankee451

I just can't figure out why you guys don't do the same with my other threads.

Well, to be right or wrong it first must have some foothold in reality. Like if you claim "unicorns like to eat green cheese from the moon", well there is no right or wrong there. Like when you claim that no planes hit the World Trade Center towers even though there are thousands of witnesses to the contrary. There is no right and wrong, because there is no reality.

Originally posted by Yankee451

Originally posted by samkent
This page has a few hi res pictures of the hole.

hi res

Thats a awful lot of pictures from different angles of something they are trying to cover up. Dont you think?

Or is it your suspicions are flat out wrong?

Yeah, can't believe I missed those.

You guys sure are quick to correct me when I'm wrong. I wonder why you don't come around on my other threads?

Well if you could actually produce any evidence of your 14feet long subsonic missiles that you claim hit the towers we would.

As you can see the admin staff can see when you dress up a thread as a no plane thread without actually using those words!

Originally posted by hooper
reply to post by Yankee451

 

I just can't figure out why you guys don't do the same with my other threads.

Well, to be right or wrong it first must have some foothold in reality. Like if you claim "unicorns like to eat green cheese from the moon", well there is no right or wrong there. Like when you claim that no planes hit the World Trade Center towers even though there are thousands of witnesses to the contrary. There is no right and wrong, because there is no reality.

Thanks for your support.

reply to post by wmd_2008

As you can see the admin staff can see when you dress up a thread as a no plane thread without actually using those words!

Yes, I see...bluebeam and bigfoot aren't hoaxes, but no planes is, so the admin staff are stalwart guardians of the truth.

Keep talkin'.