It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by lkpuede
Originally posted by Soylent Green Is People
Originally posted by lkpuede
interesting, but not likely. the likely conclusion, since we are not animals (we are by far closer to being some type of machine than being an animal), we are a topic of research...
Hmmm. I don't agree with this at all. We are MUCH MUCH closer to animals than machines. Humans are simply one of the animals living on Earth. More intelligent, maybe, but animals nevertheless.
How do you figure humans are more like machines than animals?
a "human", from a particular point of view, can be show to be nothing more than a machine. it is in possession of all the systems necessary for a machine to function. it has a circulatory system, while amazingly advanced, is no different than a car. or a truck. it has respiratory system that is no different than a car or a truck. it has a processing system that is no different than even the most rudementary of computers. it has a filtering system. the only 2 differences that is has is that it is self replicating (we call it sex), and it is self repairing. it can even be said the the machine known as human is so advanced that even after millions of years, they still haven't figured out how to repairs themselves (with doctors) without further damaging the machine.
Originally posted by Komodo
Originally posted by JesusLives
reply to post by DeNaga
demons are more complicated then you have been led to believe
PROVE IT .. !
Originally posted by lkpuede
Originally posted by Soylent Green Is People
Originally posted by lkpuede
interesting, but not likely. the likely conclusion, since we are not animals (we are by far closer to being some type of machine than being an animal), we are a topic of research...
Hmmm. I don't agree with this at all. We are MUCH MUCH closer to animals than machines. Humans are simply one of the animals living on Earth. More intelligent, maybe, but animals nevertheless.
How do you figure humans are more like machines than animals?
a "human", from a particular point of view, can be show to be nothing more than a machine. it is in possession of all the systems necessary for a machine to function. it has a circulatory system, while amazingly advanced, is no different than a car. or a truck. it has respiratory system that is no different than a car or a truck. it has a processing system that is no different than even the most rudementary of computers. it has a filtering system. the only 2 differences that is has is that it is self replicating (we call it sex), and it is self repairing. it can even be said the the machine known as human is so advanced that even after millions of years, they still haven't figured out how to repairs themselves (with doctors) without further damaging the machine.
Originally posted by Soylent Green Is People
Originally posted by lkpuede
Originally posted by Soylent Green Is People
Originally posted by lkpuede
interesting, but not likely. the likely conclusion, since we are not animals (we are by far closer to being some type of machine than being an animal), we are a topic of research...
Hmmm. I don't agree with this at all. We are MUCH MUCH closer to animals than machines. Humans are simply one of the animals living on Earth. More intelligent, maybe, but animals nevertheless.
How do you figure humans are more like machines than animals?
a "human", from a particular point of view, can be show to be nothing more than a machine. it is in possession of all the systems necessary for a machine to function. it has a circulatory system, while amazingly advanced, is no different than a car. or a truck. it has respiratory system that is no different than a car or a truck. it has a processing system that is no different than even the most rudementary of computers. it has a filtering system. the only 2 differences that is has is that it is self replicating (we call it sex), and it is self repairing. it can even be said the the machine known as human is so advanced that even after millions of years, they still haven't figured out how to repairs themselves (with doctors) without further damaging the machine.
So, according to the way that you describe humans above, animals are also just like machines -- because most complex animals such as mammals share all of these attributes with humans.
Therefore, since humans AND animals can BOTH be said to be complex machines, then humans are like animals.
Again I ask how are humans more like machines than they are like other animals? Or, at the very least, why don't you also include animals as being like machines?
Originally posted by libertytoall
It's real proof positive. You can no longer ever say it's people's imagination.
edit on 8-22-2011 by Springer because: Edited title to more accurately reflect content
Originally posted by lkpuede
you shouldn't be asking me that question...you should be asking yourself why you are so resistant to being a machine. you are absolutely against being a machine, even tho everything around you tells you that you are, in fact, a machine...
Originally posted by Soylent Green Is People
Originally posted by lkpuede
you shouldn't be asking me that question...you should be asking yourself why you are so resistant to being a machine. you are absolutely against being a machine, even tho everything around you tells you that you are, in fact, a machine...
No -- I'm not at all against being considered to be like a machine.
I think physiology in general -- not only human physiology -- can be thought of as being very machine-like (as I said before). In that respect humans, monkeys, dogs, elephants, mice, birds, reptiles, and even insects and earthworms are all machine-like.
I just don't understand how you can separate humans and other animals in that respect. Humans and other animals are very similar physiologically. Humans are the same as animals in being machine-like. Humans are NOT more machine-like than other animals.
Besides, I could ask you why you seem resistant to considering yourself to be an animal, and trying to distance humans from animals.
EDIT TO ADD:
...and sorry if this got off-topic, but IF aliens treat the earth like a zoo (and that's a HUGE if, because I do NOT believe that to be true), then humans may just be simply another animal in that zoo. The dominant animal, yes, but another animal nevertheless.
Apes are far more intelligent than, say, lizards, but we humans put both Apes and lizards in the same zoo.
edit on 8/22/2011 by Soylent Green Is People because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by anumohi
Originally posted by smallcheese
reply to post by anumohi
You are not aware that there are many other religions which also appear to claim the same?
At this point in time it appears from my seat that most alien believers are doing nothing different than practicing a remarkably similar belief which is identical to a new religion.
I guess we could get into the discussion that there is as much proof of any religious edict as what appears to be rampant in the ET phenomena
Faith that there are aliens are just swapping one god for another.
Perhaps you could explain to me how it is different?
millions of people throughout history have seen and documented seeing UFOs and even claims have been made, including by people i personally know, that have been visited by ET, where as all through history by only just a few claimed to have actually witnessed or spoke to their deity. overwhelming evidence suggests that ET is more factually believable than a several thousand year old perpetuated myth....that's the difference....Seriously
Originally posted by lkpuede
...the whole idea that you are a machine is so repugnant to you that you can't even fathom the thought. so repugnant in fact, you will come up with any reason you can to avoid the truth. you are a machine. you cannot accept it. you will find any and all reasons to explain away the perfectly obvious...
Originally posted by Cobra.EXE
debunkers should be banned from ats. when a country
is comning forward and claiming that there are sightings
up to twenty times a week, then you have no way of denying
it
especially when they spend money on a 24hr ufo surveillance
mechanism how would there be any nerve in your brain to deny
it????
Originally posted by truthrising2012
Originally posted by 11I11
Its a chinese lantern, similar to the one which crashed at Rosewell in 1947.
Many people have thought to have seen ufo's in the past but have turned out to be chinese lanterns all along. One of the biggest incident that comes to mind is probably the phoenix light incident.