Originally posted by ReaverTheBeliever
This is an easy one. I'm going to trust the NASA astronaut.
Reaver, don't you see the irony here? You're trying to penetrate official cover stories and bureaucratic self-serving propaganda [an honorable goal,
which you may be astonished to discover I share], and your mainstay of judgment is -- knee-jerk believing NASA's self-serving propaganda about the
demigodliness of astronauts?
That's what the linked 'business deals' story from the Wall Street Journal was all about. People knee-jerk trusted Cooper's opinions -- and wound
up losing literally millions of dollars in bad investments by con men who exploited Cooper's reputation and his own gullibility. Would you have given
him YOUR money, too?
Ask yourself -- why hasn't ANYONE in the UFO comunity performed and published any genuine investigations of UFO stories by such famous people? Just
accepting their quoted comments is apparently enough to perform their desired propagandistic task -- it certainly has worked with you -- of 'argument
by celebrityhood'.
It's so much more interesting to check up on any such stories. So when you talk with a dozen other pilots from Cooper's unit in Germany, or contact
the actual cameraman at Edwards AFB and other personnel who were THERE at the TIME of these events... why aren't THEIR recollections of comparable
values to Cooper's?
Why, do you suppose, is it that THEIR testimony is blacked out, covered up, and ignored by the UFO promoters? Why do you let those promoters decide
WHICH testimony YOU are allowed to hear?
Are you an accessory after the fact to your own duping? And can you even admit that possibility?