Women are better endurance athelettes than men., page 3
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 11 times


reply posted on 20-8-2011 @ 04:13 PM by kro32
reply to post by OutKast Searcher



Think of it like this. Given the differences between men and women who has more endurance for their physical make-up. Considering the fact that the top women runners finish only a few seconds behind their male counterparts while understanding the advantages a male's body has over a womans it's safe to say that a woman has more endurance.


reply posted on 20-8-2011 @ 04:16 PM by OutKast Searcher
Originally posted by kro32
reply to
post by OutKast Searcher



Think of it like this. Given the differences between men and women who has more endurance for their physical make-up. Considering the fact that the top women runners finish only a few seconds behind their male counterparts while understanding the advantages a male's body has over a womans it's safe to say that a woman has more endurance.


It's safe to say that all other things being equal, women still lose.


It's part of nature, just accept it. In some species, the female is larger, stronger, and dominant. But in humans, that is not the case....sorry....accept it and move on. Don't use fuzzy (read: crazy) logic or outright dishonesty to try to make it otherwise.
edit on 20-8-2011 by OutKast Searcher because: (no reason given)




reply posted on 20-8-2011 @ 04:19 PM by kro32
reply to post by OutKast Searcher



Actually if all things were equal they would be equal. The fact is that woman's body is made for a higher level of endurance than a man's is and this is why at the higher the level (or further they run) the closer they get to a man's performance.


reply posted on 20-8-2011 @ 04:20 PM by TDawgRex
reply to post by Thestargateisreal



Mathematics versus reality doesn't really prove anything. Both genders have their athletes and their slobs.
I see this study as a waste of money, but hey, somebody was employed at least.


reply posted on 20-8-2011 @ 04:24 PM by OutKast Searcher
Originally posted by kro32
reply to
post by OutKast Searcher



Actually if all things were equal they would be equal. The fact is that woman's body is made for a higher level of endurance than a man's is and this is why at the higher the level (or further they run) the closer they get to a man's performance.



And yet they still lose.

Why is it so hard for you to admit that men are naturally better athletes?

I like to live in the observable world...not the fantasy world made up to back up my own desires.


reply posted on 20-8-2011 @ 04:27 PM by kro32
reply to post by OutKast Searcher



Men are better athletes at some things however events that take alot of endurance, as this thread is referring too, finds that women are far superior.


reply posted on 20-8-2011 @ 04:28 PM by OutKast Searcher
Originally posted by kro32
reply to
post by OutKast Searcher



Men are better athletes at some things however events that take alot of endurance, as this thread is referring too, finds that women are far superior.


And yet they still lose to men...if women were truly "far superior"...they would be winning.

I don't think you can claim women are "far superior" when you handicap the men to get that result

Honestly...think before you speak.
edit on 20-8-2011 by OutKast Searcher because: (no reason given)




reply posted on 20-8-2011 @ 04:28 PM by kro32
reply to post by Sherlock Holmes



Read my earlier posts where I give specific examples.

The facts are lining up against you guys and it's fun watching you squirm, i'm just wating for the "troll" comments to come out soon


reply posted on 20-8-2011 @ 04:36 PM by OutKast Searcher
Originally posted by kro32
And yet they still lose?

Really?....I mean your absolutely sure about that?

Have a read my friend

Nine Great Moments in Women Beating Men at Sports

www.thesmokingjacket.com...


LOL...golf, bowling, horse back riding???

No one is saying that any man can beat any woman...but put the top man in the world in a respective sport (not bowling...LOL), and see who wins.

The fact that they had to try really really hard to get a top 10 list just shows how superior men are to women. Scrath that...they could only come up with a top 9 list.

Show me one sport where the top females are better than the top males.


This thread is hilarious.
edit on 20-8-2011 by OutKast Searcher because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 20-8-2011 @ 04:39 PM by 1SawSomeThings
Hmm interesting..... I think I'll go start a "Men are smarter than Women" thread and see how much crapola I can stir up.

Maybe not......

The best times in the men's marathon average around 15 minutes less than women's:
Best Marathon times

The argument about height differences accounting for time differences is a fail, because it doesn't include the fact that men generally have more mass than women. That indicates that more Work (in the physics sense) is being accomplished by men over the distance of the marathon, in less time.
edit on 20-8-2011 by 1SawSomeThings because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 20-8-2011 @ 04:44 PM by OutKast Searcher
reply to post by kro32



LOL...I hope you are actually joking around.

Syncronized swimming...I guess next you are going to be giving examples of cheerleading as a sport.


So, for your argument to prove that women are better athletes, you have given...bowling, horse back riding, competetive eating...and now....synchronized swimming....LOL.


I guess you are right...women are far superior athletes
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>    ^^TOP^^



Have You Seen the Attention-Grabbing New TIME Cover?
  Posted 18 days ago with 31 member flags
"I AM" the documentary in full on Youtube
  Posted 19 days ago with 11 member flags
The one topic even TED won\'t touch: Income Inequality
  Posted 12 days ago with 10 member flags
Denying Ignorance about Copyright
  Posted 13 days ago with 9 member flags
Dan Rather Slams Corporate Media
  Posted 9 days ago with 9 member flags