Women are NOT more superior. This guy is just another one of those weak "feminist male supporters" who call themselves feminists just so they can
find a way to get laid.
Throughout his whole presentation he did nothing but point out the superiority of males yet, doctored it by hypotheticals so that by weight and size
females would come out on top.
But at the end of the day, if women and men race...men win, swim, fight whatever...it doesn't matter. the only way that women are more superior is if
we men make mistakes ...like marrying them, for instance or worse, having a child with them.....no quicker way to make a woman wealthy, you as a man,
however will be homeless and destitute.
The only way this guy could make women superior is to do things like the following:
If the 'dead weight' of body fat is the key factor separating male and female running speeds, attaching weights to the bodies of male runners should
nearly equalize the performance times of the two sexes. Ingeniously, Sparling and Cureton collaborated in 1980 on a study in which weight-bearing
harnesses were strapped over the shoulders of 10 male distance runners .
So, let me get this straight.
Men have less fat, but because women have more fat retention and are adept at carrying it, when you strap weights on a man to slow him down ..that
makes women more superior?
Women are more efficient at carrying more fat than men? Well, I guess you are more superior ...AT GETTING FAT AND LEARNING TO CARRY IT.
the dumbest article ever.
They are better because men that had to strap on a harness, to prove his point, couldn't efficiently handle it better than women. This is the study?
We are already more superior for not having the fat in the first place and of course women are going to be more efficient at carrying fat...they have
had a lot of practice.
He goes on further to say:
In a test in which the athletes ran as far as possible in 12 minutes, males ran 568 metres further than females when not wearing weights, but only 395
metres further when wearing the weighted harnesses
.....so men are faster than women (again)....unless you strap a lot of simulated fat on them..again, another hypothetical that makes women more
superior for being fatter. LOL classic.
Everything this guy says points to the superiority of males except for when he "adds weights" or doctors the image.
And by the way, you will see this superiority of women thing all over the net, but make sure you look at who wrote the article. Most ARE women and of
course, they are going to say this. Just like the OP who put this on here proved...their egos are just as large as their bodies.
I had to stop reading after this because the "buried" superiority of men was riddle throughout his whole article but only masked with the superior
fatness of women and somehow that makes them better....they dont have to wear weights to be superior.
The fat content probably has to do with childbirth anyway, a situation where they would nee more endurance. We don't have that uh hem..."pleasure"
of enduring childbirth so we save our energy for providing and hunting...so goes the story of Darwin.
any way the guy also says: (I am getting tired at this point of reading this crap at this point and wish I was fatter so I could endure it more.)
If you use a fairer scale - 'heights', not metres - then the women are really quicker than the men.
Yeah, big deal.....a mouse is quicker than a cat and has smaller legs...but who's running' from who. It's the mouse's @ss if it gets caught,
despite how superior it thinks it is. It's the same with women, you can sit around eating your Bon-Bons and gaining more endurance than men and brag
about it, but in a war between a man and a woman....we wouldn't even need endurance...THE FIGHT WOULD BE OVER WITHIN SECONDS, and don't let any
Milla Jovovich, Hollywood crap convince you any different.
Now I don't go around hitting women, but there's a part deep inside that wants to every time I hear them spouting off this kind of crap about how
much better they are than men.
you are not better than men and the only reason why women are able to do anything they do today that financially rips men apart in courts and in child
support cases etc. is NOT because your smarter. It's because the America government has an evil agenda to emasculate and weaken men so that they will
have no fight left in them when the government tries to install a police state. WHICH IS HAPPENING RIGHT NOW. You women are not smarter...you just
have the government on YOUR side and are helping you to destroy men. Your feminist organizations should be called FEMINIST TERRORIST, because
everything from Christians to American people in general are called homeland terrorists now...yet, somehow, you feminists escape that government tag.
It's because you are being used for a purpose but they will throw you away when finished with you, and then you will have to prove your superiority
against all the men you have pissed off and stolen "pay" from in over the top child support cases, and the men you stole children from and used as a
tool to oppress them emotionally. There will be a payday and not the kind you're used to. I personally will do no harm to a woman, and the
aforementioned does not apply to me.But history, is the best predictor of human events and when man is pushed into a corner and overly angered....it
is MAN, not woman,....that always stands victorious in war.
This guy who wrote this is nothing more than another traitor to his own kind and if I were running this country he would be imprisoned in an
internment camp and re-indoctrinated on why he should remain a man instead of trying to be a woman. He's English (so he's already somewhat
effeminate we've seen it all before).
It is Men who are superior in every way. I don't care what this pink fruitstand says. Women have always been weak in comparison to man and always
will be. That's why THEY have never been the protectorates.