Communism, Socialism, and Marxism should be declared Treason:, page 4


Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6    7  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 12 times


reply posted on 21-8-2011 @ 02:02 AM by nightstalker46
reply to post by buster2010



Where in the preamble do you see socialism?

When were we about to go socialist.? I presume you are referring to the Carter administration. The one that gave us gasoline rationing. and 18-35% consumer interest rates and 10% unemployment. The most prosperous period in the last 40 years was 94-2000, when there was a republican majority in the house and senate, for the first time in 50 yrs. Yea, Clinton was president, but a lame duck and could not stop balanced budget amendment, welfare reform and PAGO; that congress left us with a surplus,and the next democratic congress proceeded to spend it all and a lot more. Then came 911, and enough democrats voted to go to war {they had the majority and could have stopped it} until they didn't vote for it.???

Show me a socialist financial plan that is sustainable and still allows for innovation, creativity, rewards those who produce something of value, and that provides for the common defense, and I'll consider it..


reply posted on 21-8-2011 @ 02:27 AM by Ellen15
Originally posted by sheepslayer247
You do know that ideology opens up a big can of worms that would have unrealized consequenses?

America is part socialism.....

the police are a socialist program

the fire department is a socialist program

interstates and highways are a socialist program

almost all enviromental protection programs are socialist

You see the slippery slope you have created? Now we all have to be tried for treason by your standards!

Damn socialist commies!



You forgot

Miltary - Tax payer pays

Education

Politican/Congress/White House/Public Servants - Tax payer pays
Health Insurance for Public Servants, Politicans/Congress - Tax payer pays

Business/Corporate Companies including:

Recently: Banks, Insurance,

Agriculture: Food: Corn, Wheat. Peanuts, Honey, Dairy.. Non Food: Wool, Cotton,Tobacco,

Transportation: Sea - Domestic and International Ports, Rail - lines, ports, Roads, highways, bridges etc including vehicles: cars, trucks, buses, Air Commerical Airline Industry, including Domestic and International and Ports

Energy Companies:- Oil, Coal, Gas, Nuclear, Renewables: Solar, Wind, Ethanol, Bio diesel

All Public Buildings not excluding libraries and musems, government houses/buildings

ALL receive FUNDS from YOU, The TAXPAYER/THE PUBLIC in the form of SUBSIDISES/PAYMENT/OPERATION from The Government

You call it socialist programs lolol HARDLY

Socialism is EQUAL distribution of resources INCLUDING Public Services such as (but not limited to) healthcare, education, water, power, transportation, affordable housing (yes in some countries this DOES happen) etc



reply posted on 21-8-2011 @ 03:41 AM by aero56
reply to post by sonofliberty1776



Created "equal" in what sense? Physical, mental, intellect? How? Notice how the constitution says "created" and not evolved?


reply posted on 21-8-2011 @ 06:20 AM by sonofliberty1776
Originally posted by aero56
reply to
post by sonofliberty1776



Created "equal" in what sense? Physical, mental, intellect? How? Notice how the constitution says "created" and not evolved?
Equal in the sense that we are all human beings. We all have the right to pursue our happiness. Notice it says "pursue" not "achieve". Are we all equal in the ways you listed? Of course not. Neither are we all equally motivated to work. If I do more work, I should receive more compensation, it should not be forcibly taken from me and given to you or anyone else who refuses to get off their a$$ and go to work.


reply posted on 21-8-2011 @ 06:29 AM by Ismail
reply to post by intrepid



As an anarchist, I thank you for your interest and understanding of the anarchist ideology, which is, as you state, very different from what most people believe/how society depicts anarchy.

Allow me to add that many people also confuse Libertarians (right wing social darwinists) and Anarchists (left wing social egalitarians).

Star from me.


reply posted on 21-8-2011 @ 06:41 AM by buster2010
Originally posted by nightstalker46
reply to
post by buster2010



Where in the preamble do you see socialism?

When were we about to go socialist.? I presume you are referring to the Carter administration. The one that gave us gasoline rationing. and 18-35% consumer interest rates and 10% unemployment. The most prosperous period in the last 40 years was 94-2000, when there was a republican majority in the house and senate, for the first time in 50 yrs. Yea, Clinton was president, but a lame duck and could not stop balanced budget amendment, welfare reform and PAGO; that congress left us with a surplus,and the next democratic congress proceeded to spend it all and a lot more. Then came 911, and enough democrats voted to go to war {they had the majority and could have stopped it} until they didn't vote for it.???

Show me a socialist financial plan that is sustainable and still allows for innovation, creativity, rewards those who produce something of value, and that provides for the common defense, and I'll consider it..


What part of it don't you understand? Clinton was a lame duck with job growth and a surplus when he left office. Not to mention that unlike Reagan he didn't have to give blanket amnesty to all illegal aliens to create jobs. If Clinton was a lame duck what do you call the failure that followed him? You know the one who turned a surplus into a debt within a year? You probably don't know this but there are many different forms of socialism China is a socialist country and they bankroll most of the world. Their people are rewarded and they provide for the common defense also.


reply posted on 21-8-2011 @ 06:50 AM by Kicking2bears
reply to post by nightstalker46



Because "openly advocate" is a long stretch from "actively persue". It's our freedom of speach that allows ATS to exist in the first place. ATS is not treason. I think you were saying that talking out loud about the wrong subject is treasonous... no... that's sedition. Treasonous activities are illegal for a very good reason. Typically lots of people get hurt. Sedition... well that's just people talking when you get right down to it. Don't rent space in your head to anyone.



reply posted on 21-8-2011 @ 06:52 AM by OtherSideOfTheCoin
reply to post by nightstalker46





are you suggesting that "any" political ideology should be allowed to be represented in our governmental affairs???


Yes, yes I am if you believe so strongly in the principles that underpin your political ideology that you so clearly hold dear then you should also recognise that as part of a true democratic process even the National Socialist parties have a right to stand up for election. I am amazed that you do not see the paradox of your own ideology, freedoms with the restriction of law’s are not freedoms. I don’t think you actually understand your own ideology for what I have said in my first post still stands, I don’t really have to add anything to it for it exposes the illogical premise of your OP.

Just remember both Hamas and the Nazi party both gained power in democratic elections despite their extreme views, democracy only works if the guy you want to win, wins.


reply posted on 21-8-2011 @ 07:32 AM by Gannicus
reply to post by mr-lizard



I see no evidence that either of those systems works. I'd fight to the death to remove them from my society. You are not nearly as wise as you think you are.


reply posted on 21-8-2011 @ 07:53 AM by Maslo
reply to post by mr-lizard




maybe because it works in countries outside the USA perhaps? You know... older, wiser countries?


Communism, and true socialism works nowhere. The only thing that works is social capitalism, and better than pure capitalism or socialism. Best of both worlds.


reply posted on 21-8-2011 @ 07:57 AM by Maslo
reply to post by Ismail





Allow me to add that many people also confuse Libertarians (right wing social darwinists) and Anarchists (left wing social egalitarians). Star from me.


Libertarians are not true anarchists.

There are two kinds of anarchism: leftwing social anarchists (which is IMHO a contradiction in terms) and rightwing anarchocapitalists (which is temporarily possible but inherently very unstable).

Both of these ideologies are utopian, unreal and against human rights.

edit on 21/8/11 by Maslo because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 21-8-2011 @ 08:00 AM by OtherSideOfTheCoin
reply to post by Maslo



Don’t you mean state capitalism, I do agree with you it is a very good economic ideology that worked well for some former soviet states, some argue that it’s the system that China are currently utilising with fantastic results. I would rather argue that China is now a capitalist state with communist characteristics rather than utilising a state capitalist economic model but there are some compelling arguments.

But yes state capitalism is the way to go.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6    7  >>    ^^TOP^^



I Changed Party Affiliation Today
  Posted 6 days ago with 20 member flags
Direct Democrcy
  Posted 12 days ago with 9 member flags
In The Belly Of The Beast.
  Posted 7 days ago with 9 member flags
I\'m confused about Ron Paul
  Posted 10 days ago with 6 member flags
\'Emergency\' Tax on the Rich Roils Britain
  Posted 13 days ago with 4 member flags
2009 news report proves paul ryan was correct about plant closure.
  Posted 12 days ago with 4 member flags
What is the true definition of a Liberal?
  Posted 8 days ago with 4 member flags