It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Skinwalker1979
reply to post by obzerver
Setting aside your your horrible grammar and apparent lack of knowledge, I'm guessing that you're horribly mistaken. If I'm reading your comment correctly, you're saying that the notion of skinwalkers is an attempt to portray Native Americans as barbaric? Well... Most cultures, even many still in existence today, have some form of witchcraft/witch doctors, etc. This isn't an attempt to villify Native Americans, just a discussion on an aspect of thier culture that is indeed FACT. There are countless sources that can be used to confirm this interesting portion of thier heritage. So maybe before you go on a rant accusing people of bashing on Native Americans, maybe you should do a little research. Oh, and use some form of spellcheck.
Originally posted by hadriana
What I'd like to know is if the skinwalker actually merges with the skin, and goes forth as himself, with no shifting of consciousness but with a physical shift in his body, or if the skinwalker mentally merges with a target-species type animal and then goes forth using that animal's body with it's consciousness subjected.
My guess is on the later.
My guess is that the requirements of killing someone close to you are to assure people that this sort of powerful person is rare, and evil, and to discourage people from trying to tamper with magic this powerful.
What would it do to a psyche to murder someone you loved and cherished? It would have to mean that you would want magickal power more than ANYTHING. I suspect that is where the truth is. The talk of going to abandoned places to practice this sort of magic leads me to believe the same- that to practice this magic would be all consuming- my guess is that the person you'd really have to sacrifice is yourself, and thus the magic is both trans formative and sacrifice transforms the magic, making it very, very powerful indeed, but also, it seems like it would make the practitioner prone to prefer extreme isolation.
Originally posted by hadriana
No, the trick is not SOMEONE - but "SOMEONE YOU LOVE"
and love is not usually associated with murder. Other emotions are, like jealousy or whatnot. Love is often incompatable with greed.
I think that this requirement is probably merely symbolic - if one were willing to do that, one probably would not have to do it.
And no, I don't think being poor itself would be an inpetus to serious study of magick,especially for native Americans who traditionally were not used to a lot of possessions anyway. These legends predate the material possessions this chief was talking about - IE cars, jewelry, ect.
Scapegoats are often made out of the poor with the charge of witch, but that's an entirely different darkness.
Originally posted by Thunderheart
reply to post by Omega85
Why do you people insist on talking about these things?
Some things should just be left alone, seriously.
Originally posted by Omega85
reply to post by Thunderheart
if you dont like it then thats too bad , feel free to pollute other threads with your off topic whining because any further off topic and non constructively useless comments by you in this thread will be deleted . Thanks .
blatant waste of bandwidth and non common sense from the above member and i will moderate the thread with more vigilance from now on
Originally posted by Omega85
I just want to clear something up here .
The people called Skinwalkers do exist and are actually real so i think it would be better for those who are skeptical to just make sure that when you are saying things like "i dont believe its real" or the like to specify that you are skeptical of there abilities and not the people themselves . Just to clear up some confusion for anyone going through the thread the first time or anything like that .
The First Amendment (Amendment I) to the United States Constitution is part of the Bill of Rights. The amendment prohibits the making of any law “respecting an establishment of religion,” impeding the free exercise of religion, abridging the freedom of speech, infringing on the freedom of the press, interfering with the right to peaceably assemble or prohibiting the petitioning for a governmental redress of grievances.