It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Red Cloak
Originally posted by filosophia
But basically there is no leaning in this direction so can't we spare the anti-christ talk until there is at least some more concrete evidence two Paul's will be in the white house? And how does that signal anti-christ?
Because Rand Paul's name adds up to the number 666 in both the Greek and Latin Gematriasedit on 19-8-2011 by Red Cloak because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by iamnang
I thought they spoke Aramaic??
Originally posted by InFriNiTee
reply to post by Red Cloak
Randall Paul actually shortened his name, see this youtube link Rand Paul and his name:
edit on 8/19/2011 by InFriNiTee because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by eLPresidente
reply to post by Red Cloak
I don't know why I have to ask this but, please link to a source...
Originally posted by eLPresidente
So is this completely irrelevant for anybody that doesn't have vested faith in Christianity?
Think about it...
Originally posted by eLPresidente
So is this completely irrelevant for anybody that doesn't have vested faith in Christianity?
Think about it...
Originally posted by eLPresidente
reply to post by Red Cloak
You linked a source to all the mumbo jumbo proving that the numbers make sense but you didn't link to a source that the video Rand Paul recorded was indeed the numbers that add up to 666.
Now, please link to a source.
Originally posted by Red Cloak
As you can see, current United States Senator Rand Paul (the son of Ron Paul) has a 666 numerical value for the popular common form of his name (Rand Paul) in both the Greek and Latin Gematria systems.
So, if Ron Paul becomes the next President of the United States, and if he selects his son Rand Paul to be the next Vice President of the United States.
Originally posted by Red Cloak
Originally posted by eLPresidente
reply to post by Red Cloak
You linked a source to all the mumbo jumbo proving that the numbers make sense but you didn't link to a source that the video Rand Paul recorded was indeed the numbers that add up to 666.
Now, please link to a source.
I would of, but the mumbo jumbo comment turned me off.