Shouldn't be a new thread about this, but my opinion is that we did walk with dinosaurs, evidence supports that, official statement that say otherwise are speculative.

Any ancient civilization that uses a dinosaur in their art has clearly seen a living dinosaur creature, period.

If you were ever standing next to a full size Komodo Dragon or sitting on the bank of a river with
a 22 foot long Nile crocodile.....you would agree that man and dinosaurs are still side by side.

And they think we are tasty.

Originally posted by myselfaswell
Also, just to let you know;

“Because of the great discussion on this thread, our own JohnnyAnonymous has booked a special guest for this Saturdays episode of ATS LIVE!

None other than Michael Cremo of "Forbidden Archaeology" will be on the show to discuss dinosaurs and humans and many other topics of interest to this discussion.”

Thanks for the heads up

Originally posted by JibbyJedi

Any ancient civilization that uses a dinosaur in their art has clearly seen a living dinosaur creature, period.

What makes that true? As I said in the other thread when old map makers put dragons and sea serpents on their maps does that mean they have clearly seen a living dragon or sea serpent "period?"

Originally posted by GogoVicMorrow

Originally posted by JibbyJedi

Any ancient civilization that uses a dinosaur in their art has clearly seen a living dinosaur creature, period.

What makes that true? As I said in the other thread when old map makers put dragons and sea serpents on their maps does that mean they have clearly seen a living dragon or sea serpent "period?"

If old map makers put dragons and sea serpents on their maps, and then 400 years later we find the remains of sea creatures that current technology says would look identical to those on the maps ... logic would dictate the map makers were drawing creatures that had been observed yes? Or would you say wow that is an amazing cooincidence, how did they get so many details right on creatures that had never been seen before?

Drawings do not dictate the animal is real. Real creatures being accurately depicted is strong evidence that the creatures were known to the artist. To suggest otherwise is sheer ignorance. The question now shifts from if they were known to HOW they were known.