Originally posted by gumanthon1
The previous footage listed about the UFO MARS was released in all honesty.
Perhaps, but with no research or earnestness.
The first dead giveaway was the obvious limited depth of field of the image. Also, you knew -- before you made the original image -- that it came from
the microscopic imager, which is never used for landscape shots, because it's incapable of landscape shots.
This is what NASA gets when they try.
Can you not see the NASA are playing around. I saw that picture late last night. I appreciate that several people had seen it prior to
me.
NASA has played around in the past, but this certainly isn't an example of them playing now.
Within hours of the rivet/pin/screw being discovered here, you kept deleting the YouTube comments of people trying to point out the error of your
conclusions. The result was the appearance of trying to keep a hoax alive, which then resulted in more and more nasty comments on your video.
Regrettable. Inappropriate. But not unpredictable.
And now that the SOL 666 image has been revealed by you as your original source, it's difficult to believe anyone would think it's an image of any
Mars landscape, given the clearly-defined hard-edge to the left of the screw/pin/rivet head, which is part of the mechanism.
you must remember several thousand people were searching the NASA site after I release my video
I found it within minutes once I realized which camera was used. All I did was start at the very first series of images (Opportunity SOL 002), and
there it was. If you had released more information sooner, the assumption of "hoax" may not have happened.
but at that time did not releas the number sol 666 for my picture.
Why?
And were are the "many more" images of that "UFO" you referenced in your original video?
isn't it rather obvious what is going on here.
Yes.
On the surface, the events come across as you releasing a poorly researched "UFO finding," with no back-up, provenience, or supporting material. Then
you trying to hype it, resisting evidence that shows it's not a UFO, positioning those who are trying to get you to understand what you saw as
trolls/haters, and riling your followers on your YouTube channel against debunkers/haters/trolls just trying to show the conclusions to be full of
errors. And ultimately being considered just another hoax, adding another nail of stupidity in the coffin of UFOlogy.
When you combine the above with the clear hard-edge in the image (SOL 666) you used as your source; from our point of view, how could we have come to
any other conclusion than that of an attempt to create and spread a UFO hoax?
I appreciate you stopping by to tell your side of the story. However, you must realize how things appeared from "this side" of the situation.
edit on 23-8-2011 by SkepticOverlord because: (no reason given)
edit on 23-8-2011 by SkepticOverlord because: (no reason
given)
