It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Washington tried to snatch 1-5 With Document File

page: 3
22
<< 1  2   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 20 2011 @ 06:29 PM
link   
reply to post by Xcathdra
 





Please show us the sources you use to come to your conclusions?


i provided soruce which you refuse to believe thats your problem because you always believe in those Western MSM sources which always lie.





edit on 20-8-2011 by Agent_USA_Supporter because: (no reason given)




posted on Aug, 20 2011 @ 06:31 PM
link   

Originally posted by Agent_USA_Supporter
reply to post by Xcathdra
 





Please show us the sources you use to come to your conclusions?


i provided soruce which you refuse to believe thats your problem because you always believe in those Western MSM


No, you have not.. As I said, ive gone through the threada few times now. All I find are personall attacks from you towards us, and attack son western media.

At NO point have you provided a source that YOU find credible for ua to see and view.

I am going to assume that not only are you not going to answer this question, you are going to go into circular argument mode, continually ignoring the questions while saying you already answered them..

I remain optomistic though, that you will prove me wrong by showing me your sources that you find credible for us to see.

Please, prove me wrong.



posted on Aug, 20 2011 @ 06:31 PM
link   
reply to post by Xcathdra
 





.What you have done is to attack us personally


i havent attacked you your the ones attacking me its the opposite.



posted on Aug, 20 2011 @ 06:34 PM
link   

Originally posted by Agent_USA_Supporter
reply to post by Xcathdra
 





.What you have done is to attack us personally


i havent attacked you your the ones attacking me its the opposite.


Um no.. what we have done is challeneged your position, which you dont like. We have used sources in western media, which you dont like.

You then get pissed because we wont just take your word for it. You get even more pissy when we ask you for links to YOUR media sources that YOU find credible.

So far nothing but obfuscation... You give us responses like this one, and the one above, that ignores the question and request we made, so you can contually say you answered it, when you didnt.

You DID NOT provide any sources for us to see that you find credible.

PLEASE show us sources you find credible.

You have made claims that the US is stealing money, when all the info present says that is a flat out lie. Please show us your media sources that say something different.
edit on 20-8-2011 by Xcathdra because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 20 2011 @ 07:02 PM
link   
reply to post by Xcathdra
 


About my soruce Xcathdra




- Authors : diplomats, economists, geographers, historians, journalists, military servicemen, philosophers, sociologists.


voltairenet is credbile and so is there information.





The Voltaire Network was founded in the context of a campaign in favour of freedom of speech, which the founders thought was put into jeopardy by new laws enshrined in the French penal code. After the campaign the association lived on, specialising in the study of far-right movements and religions. It was vocal notably in preventing the French government from funding the religious part of the Pope's visit to France, and in initiating an investigation of the French Parliament regarding the French far-right militia group DPS. Since 1999, the Réseau Voltaire has dealt with international issues, notably by publishing daily news about the bombings of Serbia by NATO.




Now it seems as you two have a grudge agaisnt it.
edit on 20-8-2011 by Agent_USA_Supporter because: (no reason given)

edit on 20-8-2011 by Agent_USA_Supporter because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 20 2011 @ 07:04 PM
link   
reply to post by Agent_USA_Supporter
 


As Mr X has said, we attack your position, not you. Calling us liars for providing multiple choice, whilst you provide one answer and remind absolute that it is true is not anything more, nor anything less, than the product of either bias, agent, or indoctrination. All of which give credence that you are simply not a good critical thinker.

See what I did there? I provided evidence and reason. While you simply say we're lying and move on.


Now in case you have the misfortune of not comprehending this, in a civil discussion, you provide sources to provide your claims.

You have not.

Ergo you are the liar.



posted on Aug, 20 2011 @ 07:05 PM
link   
reply to post by Agent_USA_Supporter
 


Providing a reason that a source is credible from the source is like saying fox news is fair and balanced because they put it on their logo.

Again. Lack of critical thinking on your part.



posted on Aug, 20 2011 @ 07:06 PM
link   
reply to post by Gorman91
 





See what I did there? I provided evidence and reason. While you simply say we're lying and move on.


Sorry i dont find information from the western mainstream as evidence or credible. I guess you believe the offical bin laden raid story to? not surprised at all.



posted on Aug, 20 2011 @ 07:07 PM
link   
reply to post by Gorman91
 





Providing a reason that a source is credible from the source is like saying fox news is fair and balanced because they put it on their logo.


I could say the same thing about CNN, BBC, and other western news networks.



posted on Aug, 20 2011 @ 07:12 PM
link   
reply to post by Agent_USA_Supporter
 


Not at all... what I am saying is you calim the Us stole the money, and yet you cannot show us anything anywhere that supports the claim.

what we have shown you is the Un resolution on libya and the conditions it set forth with regards to seized libyan assets. Part of that resolution says seized money cannot be released - period.

the US, along with 33 other nations (and I know your opinion on this, and quite franky I take your view here with as much intrest as arab governments took when they recognized the taliban as the offical governmentof Afghanistan) have recognized the TNC as the legitimate government.

In order to help them the Us wanted to release portions of the seized funding to the TNC. Those release come with stipulations.

the letter was to request the UN to lookinto it and act on the recomendation.

No where does it say they tried to steal the money.


Also, I will point out that you attack western media as non reliable, and yet you completely FAIL to show us what news sources you pull your info from.

what media sources DO YOU TRUST?
edit on 20-8-2011 by Xcathdra because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 20 2011 @ 07:14 PM
link   

Originally posted by Agent_USA_Supporter
reply to post by Gorman91
 





Providing a reason that a source is credible from the source is like saying fox news is fair and balanced because they put it on their logo.


I could say the same thing about CNN, BBC, and other western news networks.


You have in so many words... What you have refused to do though is show us what media sources you feel ARE reliable and trustworthy, where YOU get your information from.

Its a simple request, so im not sure why you refuse to answer it.



posted on Aug, 20 2011 @ 07:14 PM
link   
reply to post by Agent_USA_Supporter
 





Sorry i dont find information from the western mainstream as evidence or credible. I guess you believe the offical bin laden raid story to? not surprised at all.


Strawman fallacy.




I could say the same thing about CNN, BBC, and other western news networks.


Yes, you could. And that's why you can't say it for your source. Starting to get it?


So are you actually going to start thinking critically now?



posted on Aug, 20 2011 @ 08:23 PM
link   

ATTENTION!!!!!



This is the topic of the thread:

Washington tried to snatch 1-5 With Document File



Please discuss the topic, and not the other members. Off topic side bars are not helpful to the subject and may result in post removals.

Terms & Conditions Of Use

ALL MEMBERS: We expect civility and decorum within all topics

Ad Hominem Attacks And You

Trolling, And What To Do About It

YOU are responsible for your own posts



posted on Aug, 20 2011 @ 09:55 PM
link   
*Mod Edit - Off-Topic removed

I would like to repeat my very on topic opinion that the source has indeed been proven to be biased and I've not yet received any other sources validating his claims. Which truly I must beg to question if this even is real.
edit on 21-8-2011 by alien because: (no reason given)




top topics



 
22
<< 1  2   >>

log in

join