It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

We are here for your daughters! Lingerie for girls aged 4 thru 12.

page: 3
9
<< 1  2    4 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 18 2011 @ 08:18 PM
link   
Am I surprised? Not really..... Disgusted yes but it's not like this stuff isn't the norm already, what do you expect when they want to start sex ed in elementary school and have children on TV dressing not far from lingerie already..... Don't even get me started on the pedo shows with these children in pageants... I wish this was some kind of scandal or shock to me but it's been happening so much it is what they are trying to make the norm, sick if ya ask me......




posted on Aug, 18 2011 @ 08:18 PM
link   

Originally posted by TerryMcGuire

They can sleep at night because of the paycheck. They do not have the moral sense that you and I possess. To them their young daughters sexuality is no more than a commodity to be bought and sold in a moral-less economy.
Though this website is vile to people like us, it is smorgasbord to others. You teach and raise your children very much as I raised mine.

This trend in treating young children as sexual objects is not new. It is old and continuous. Though you and I fight against it, it is the reemergence of mans baser instincts and I have no idea how to turn it around.


I can't believe you used the word smorgasbord!


Kids should be kids, not sexual objects striving to be like their older effeminate role models (who, in the end, turn out to be media-approved floozies).

I agree, making mud-pies was where it's at. And not the alcoholic beverage variety.
edit on 18/8/2011 by andriod because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 18 2011 @ 09:16 PM
link   
reply to post by andriod
 


Media-approved floozies. What more is there to say my friend.



posted on Aug, 18 2011 @ 09:18 PM
link   

Originally posted by Ghost375
seriously, wtf is wrong with our society. You wonder why people want doom and 2012 to happen? It's cause of stuff like this. Society is demented. And don't say it's cause they're french. The french are more like americans than you know. They are both arrogant peoples.
Anyone who thinks this is okay has problems.


I wholeheartedly agree with everything you stated. This is one of the reasons that I want Nibiru to be real. The human species has become so disgusting!

Let's take note of WHO is going to be buying these clothes. The rich. They're expensive clothes and will only be affordable for people who have mostly lost their morals anyways because they're so blinded by money and outward appearances. It's also the rich freaks that can and will afford to see a baby or little girl dressed in these clothes. I recently did a thread on pedos in Hollywood. Don't get me wrong, all pedos are bad, but the rich pedos seem to be the most depraved.

Bottom line for all girls of all classes is that they don't need to feel sexy. It just simply attracts the wrong kind of attention from the worst kind of people.



posted on Aug, 18 2011 @ 09:36 PM
link   
I do not even have children, but I am serious when I say that, if given the opportunity, I would viciously physically attack the people behind this stuff.



Originally posted by andriod
Men already comment on how much of a doll she looks like and how beautiful she will be when she's 16, and I just want to throw fists in their general direction.

WHAT THE -- !? Well, why don't you? Dumbasses.....



And I think now would be a good time to ask a simple question that has been on my mind for a while now. Basically, why is it that the media, fashion industry, etc. seems to ONLY target girls when it comes to filth like this? As we all know, there's a market out there for young boys, but when it comes to sexualizing kids and essentially turning them into whores, it indeed seems as if 99% of the focus is on girls. I'm inclined to believe that is a conspiracy. Thoughts? Any answers would be appreciated.



posted on Aug, 18 2011 @ 09:39 PM
link   
reply to post by Bleak
 


The KGB stated in the 70s (I'll have to find the video), that in order to bring down a country, you must first destroy its morals.
Here it is: www.youtube.com...


edit on 18-8-2011 by Afterthought because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 18 2011 @ 11:25 PM
link   
reply to post by MrEuphoric1
 


Well, the difference is Europe vs USA. Kids run around naked on the beaches in Europe. It is fairly normal to see eight, nine, ten year olds running around completely naked on the beaches in Europe. Most women are also topless. You know how many men ogle those women? Next to none. Americans who are not used to nudity are probably the only ones getting turned on.

And you know how may adults think kids being au naturel is pedophilia? Next to none... people are just more open minded in Europe and they don't automatically assume everyone is a pedophile or a pervert.

But I have a feeling this will be too difficult to understand for the American readers and I will get called a pedophile just for calling Americans puritanical or closed-minded. Oh well, you know how much I care?


I am more opposed to selling gun replicas to children as toys than frilly underwear that still shows nothing it shouldn't, even for American standards.

Khar



posted on Aug, 19 2011 @ 01:53 AM
link   
reply to post by MrEuphoric1
 





Well your right on with the marketing "big girls clothes" I have always said that those little jumpsuits with the words on the butt were ridiculous...like why would I draw attention to my 9 year olds butt with the word "SEXY" or "ANGEL" But at least that is outside apparel.


I noticed that as well about a year ago all the females used to wear them both young and mature females, and with all kinds of eye catching words on the back side. And yes it is all about insinuating sex, and with words such as "sexy" or "princess" or "juicy" or a bunch of other eye catching words that I cant remember right now.

You know I never really thought of it till this thread, but ya that is some weird stuff, and I assume its just another thing females do to attract attention and the attention of certain males to themselves.

This whole thing seems to be the same thing, and probably just a marketing type of thing for over priced clothes, or about insinuation sex and stuff. All's I can say is i have seen girls that age 4 or 5 go without a top at beaches and never though a second time about it when I seen it.

But if I saw a 4 yr old with make up and all fancied up and dolled up with those like in those pictures that would most likely insinuate sex, more then if it was just some little kid girl running around without a top at the beach. And since females wear clothes like that for sexual attraction purpuses then it is pretty obvious what its all about. You dont even need a word written across the butt to get the message out.


As I see it whatever, I dont notice stuff like this in daily life anyways even when it's right in front of my face. So it just comes down to the kids parents and what there like, because usually the apple does not fall far from the tree. So the picture is pretty obvious and clear on what it is all about. Sex sells and sex is also a weapon for female types, nothing more need be said.



posted on Aug, 19 2011 @ 02:17 AM
link   
reply to post by Bleak
 





but when it comes to sexualizing kids and essentially turning them into whores, it indeed seems as if 99% of the focus is on girls. I'm inclined to believe that is a conspiracy. Thoughts? Any answers would be appreciated.


How is this even a question?

Its because of differences in biology, males are by nature more straight forward and will do to get what they want.

And females are more matirialistic both because of biology such as they can get pregnant and must think of the future more and because that is just what they are.

Ok, what do fishermen do when they want to catch whales?

They spear the female and then when the male comes in or sticks around to protect the female, they spear the male also, and so they catch two for the price of one....Get it.

If they speared the male first the female would take off as soon as she senses danger.

And the same can be applied to humans, since females are more materialistic there love or whatever you want to call it, is different from males in comparison with the relations between them. Basically a females love does not go above herself or her offspring, and males are just a means to an end to them.

Were as male types it goes much more deeper and binds more so then females, both because of nature and other things. And so it is simple you spear the female then the male will come, if you spear the male then no female will come she just will move on to another, and another, and so on.

Its like basic knowledge 101 of how to control populations and humans....duh.

And so even in this marketing thing with the clothes they sell it really is the same thing. Basically sex sells, and who do you think is dumb enough to always buy it....Take a guess?... male types. Duh. After all you rarely see female types buying sex or going out of there way for the other gender, like you see male types do.

What was that Dave Chapelle joke

"A woman's test is material. A man's test is a woman...if a man could # in a cardboard box, he wouldn't buy a house." Basically all of civilization is an attempt at impressing the other sex.

As for why they have this thing going on and what is the end game in the long scope of things, well you dont want to know.
But personally I blame the greys, and other space aliens.



posted on Aug, 19 2011 @ 02:32 AM
link   
All men of power are pedophiles and this is just a line for their interests, not for any of you average folks here.



posted on Aug, 19 2011 @ 04:16 AM
link   
reply to post by galadofwarthethird
 

(--??!?!??)
Jesus, what? I have no idea what you're going on about. I mean...........what???

Okay, let me reword my question and attempt to simplify it..............

Why is it that all attempts to sexualize children seem to be aimed at girls (even though lots of pedophiles, as everyone knows, go for boys)?

The normal interests of normal men obviously have nothing to do with this, as this is obviously an abnormal thing.



posted on Aug, 19 2011 @ 04:33 AM
link   
I saw the front page of the website and nothing pedo there. Anyone that immediately associates something as mundane as the items and pictures there as "pedo" is definitely thinking along deviate lines.



posted on Aug, 19 2011 @ 04:56 AM
link   

Originally posted by MrEuphoric1
reply to post by Wyn Hawks
 


I respectfully disagree, and like I told the designer....

Take some of your lingerie, put it on your daughter, (niece, granddaughter, anyone in aged 4 to 12), take a bunch of pictures, then upload to the internet.
Then cross your fingers at night while your tucking her in that only normal good people are looking at the pics thinking "what a cute LITTLE GIRL"


I am sorry but that is completely assinine. Would you buy your 4-12 year old little girl plain old boring underwear?
Would you upload pics of that same little girl in those boring undies to the web?
Buying your child underwear is a LONG ass stretch from posting pics of her in it all over the internet.


and I will continue to promote causes like "Perverted Justice" and "ISPCAN" so that the sickos out there, (and they are out there weather you believe it or not) get caught while enjoying those same pictures. I will protect her for you by spreading the word, promoting groups preventing perversions against our children and changing sentencing laws for those ill ones. Don't worry for her, I have her back. Cause I know it is all, horribly, unforgettably, REAL. Not my own neurosis.

signed, MRS and MREUPHORIC1
edit on 18-8-2011 by MrEuphoric1 because: (no reason given)


Keep supporting PJ and you are doing nothing to help. They have a great track record of entrapping men who later have the charges dropped. Real pedophiles are not caught by PJ.



posted on Aug, 19 2011 @ 04:59 AM
link   

Originally posted by andriod
I have a 9-month-old ...

... Men already comment on how much of a doll she looks like and how beautiful she will be when she's 16, and I just want to throw fists in their general direction.


No they don't.
Unless you happen to be finding the weirdest men on the planet to show your baby to, no man is looking at a 9 month old baby and telling you how hot they are going to be as a teenager.
Sorry but I do not believe that for a second.



posted on Aug, 19 2011 @ 05:02 AM
link   

Originally posted by metaldemon2000
Nah its the clothing.
who just wakes up one day and says hey why don't we dress.little kids up like those girls in thevporno mags??


Porno mags?
I must be looking at all the wrong pictures. Can someone point out to me which outfits look like they are from porno movies? Can someone tell me specifically which outfits are too sexy and why? What kind of porn mags do you look at?



posted on Aug, 19 2011 @ 05:50 AM
link   

Originally posted by chanel


It made me remember back to when I was a little girl...Superwoman was really popular and all I wanted in the whole world was a super woman bra. I had no boobies at that point to fill it up but that didn't matter in my mind.
.


UNDEROOS 4 LIFE!!!!



posted on Aug, 19 2011 @ 05:57 AM
link   
reply to post by Kitilani
 





I am sorry but that is completely assinine. Would you buy your 4-12 year old little girl plain old boring underwear? Would you upload pics of that same little girl in those boring undies to the web? Buying your child underwear is a LONG ass stretch from posting pics of her in it all over the internet.


You apparently missed the entire point of post. ITS THE PICTURES I FIND MOST HORRIFING!! (with the marketing of "lingerie" to young girls a close second) FOR MULTIPLE OTHER REASONS..But that is another thread..Its pretentious, ridiculous, and could send a message to my daughter that she does NOT need to learn until she's older.

The pictures of a dolled up CHILD in clothing only designed for ones own sexiness or to entice another is not good for any child. KEY WORD BEING CHILD.

As for the boring underwear comment...YES, I WILL PUT NO EMPHASIS ON MY LITTLE GIRLS UNDERGARMENTS MORE THAN THE FACT THAT THEY ARE NEEDED APPROPIATE ATTIRE. THIS IS NOT SOMETHING SHE NEEDS TO LEARN AT 5 OR 10. LET HER BE A KID...AGAIN A DIFFERENT THREAD ENTIRELY, AND I WONT DEBATE PARENTING WITH YOU.

The pictures, the idea, the insanity of this is the problem. And if you condone this then you have to be willing to say that a picture of your OWN CHILD in ANY CLOTHING DESIGNED FOR SEXUAL ENTICEMENT MARKETED TO THE WORLD IS OKAY.

That is what this designer did. He put children in CLOTHING DESIGNED FOR SEXUAL ENTICEMENT & MARKETED TO THE WORLD for profit.

And I will continue to try to stop it



posted on Aug, 19 2011 @ 06:10 AM
link   
reply to post by Kitilani
 





Keep supporting PJ and you are doing nothing to help. They have a great track record of entrapping men who later have the charges dropped. Real pedophiles are not caught by PJ.


YOU DONT KNOW ME OR WHAT I DO FOR A LIVING. YOU HAVE ABSOLUTELY NO IDEA WHAT I DO TO BE PART OF A SOLUTION AND YOU CAN HAND PICK MY WORDS TO ATTEMPT A CRAFTY INSULT PRETENDING YOU KNOW SOMETHING ABOUT SOMETHING BUT YOU DONT.

SO KEEP YOUR OFF TOPIC COMMENTS TO YOURSELF OR WHAT......DID I MAYBE HIT A NERVE WITH YOU???? DO YOU KNOW SOMEONE WHO WAS "entrapped" by PJ", or MAYBE "had the charges dropped"?
"real pedophiles", fake one's, part-time ones, or those who think it in their head but haven't acted yet,,,,,MAKES NO DIFFERENCE (to me) ITS A PERSON WHO NEEDS HELP or prison or both, and I, my friend, will continue to advocate for the innocent. Someone has to.



posted on Aug, 19 2011 @ 06:24 AM
link   
reply to post by Snoopy1978
 


Well, you might be right but the fact that you DONT find it disturbing or devious says to me you either..

A: Have never found yourself or a loved one in the devastating situation of being a child taken advantage of..
B: Are one of the few who still believes that heinous acts of perversions against children, cant, wont, or doesn't
happen in your area. (which statistically is improbable)
C: have lived a very, very, very sheltered protected life in perhaps a convent, or small tribe somewhere not
civilized where marriage is entered into once the brain is fully developed. (meaning not at 12)
or LASTLY WHICH I HIGHLY DOUBT
D: you are a supporter of NAMBLA or some similar group.

I believe your comment is coming from a good place, and I find you very lucky to feel that way, but Education, Experience, and Studies tell me otherwise. It sadly happens nearly everywhere, and is brushed under the rug in more countries than not. Personally, I just want to try to keep a kid a kid for as long as they can be. And feel I have a duty to help stop this. ESPECIALLY when this entire concept was for someone to make money. I believe it to be a sign of what this world has come to,what we will do for money,and how all that is important, LIKE OUR CHILDREN< OUR FUTURE take a backseat..and it saddens me.
edit on 19-8-2011 by MrEuphoric1 because: spelling



posted on Aug, 19 2011 @ 06:36 AM
link   
reply to post by galadofwarthethird
 





All's I can say is i have seen girls that age 4 or 5 go without a top at beaches and never though a second time about it when I seen it. But if I saw a 4 yr old with make up and all fancied up and dolled up with those like in those pictures that would most likely insinuate sex, more then if it was just some little kid girl running around without a top at the beach. And since females wear clothes like that for sexual attraction purpuses then it is pretty obvious what its all about.


EXACTLY!!! Content, Context, age and idea appropriateness!!! You said exactly what i was thinking. That was my problem with this line and its marketing campaign.That is what has to change.

This IS NOT the 5 year old girl or boy that rips his pants off and runs thru the house just because she does not want to wear pants. or the child at the beach . This also is not the picture of me and my brother in the bath tub together at age 8 cheesin at the camera without a care in the world. THIS WAS MARKETED AS LINGERIE FOR CHILDREN. CLOTHING DESIGNED FOR ENTICEMENT THEN PHOTOGRAPHED IN ADULT SETTINGS WITH ADULT ACCESSORIES ALL FOR THE SAKE OF MAKING MONEY.



new topics

top topics



 
9
<< 1  2    4 >>

log in

join