It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by kro32
Who is going to take over the responsiblility's that the Fed has now if he get's rid of it? Would he make a new department and call it Fed 2.0?
The federal reserve does other things than just spend all day bankrupting the country you know.
Originally posted by kcfusion
reply to post by beezzer
You state you need a leader to uphold the constitution, if thats one of your main reasons for voting. Why look any further than Ron, who is a champion of your constitution??
Originally posted by beezzer
Originally posted by kcfusion
reply to post by beezzer
You state you need a leader to uphold the constitution, if thats one of your main reasons for voting. Why look any further than Ron, who is a champion of your constitution??
True. But I'm sceptical. I don't blindly follow anyone. Even someone with whom I agree with.
Originally posted by kro32
Who is going to take over the responsiblility's that the Fed has now if he get's rid of it? Would he make a new department and call it Fed 2.0?
The federal reserve does other things than just spend all day bankrupting the country you know.
Originally posted by kro32
reply to post by ThirdEyeofHorus
Congress can delegate their responsibilities to whomever they want. They have to since there is too much for them to do. Do you really expect them to roll up their sleeves and head down to the printing press while arguing over legislation?