Creationist Propaganda, page 2

privacy

Pages: << 1 2 >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 6 times

reply posted on 19-8-2011 @ 01:46 AM by XplanetX

Originally posted by Astyanax
Forget the ‘thread about a thread’ nonsense. Read the web page linked to in the OP.

This is what creationists are forced, by their beliefs, to be: liars even unto themselves.

Now consider the status of the other thread starter. If creationists cannot be trusted to tell the truth, can they be trusted to be impartial moderators on a web forum?

The question is certainly valid.

edit on 19/8/11 by Astyanax because: of the truth.

I could equally say the same about you.

You experience the creation first hand and yet you deny that it is created?

Who is deceived?

reply posted on 22-8-2011 @ 08:39 AM by Astyanax

reply to post by XplanetX

I could equally say the same about you.

Except it would not be true. I challenge you to find one instance of untruthfulness in any of my posts on ATS.

You could say it, but it would be just another creationist lie. Not a new thing to me; I once had a creationist member create an account with a name almost the same as mine and use it to spam other members’ profile pages with homosexual porn. Offline, another creationist who had once been a friend of mine burnt a book I wrote because it had pictures of Hindu gods and folk rituals in it, and told people I had been taken over by the Devil.

That’s the kind of people I have found creationists to be.

reply posted on 24-8-2011 @ 02:28 AM by addygrace

Originally posted by Astyanax
reply to post by XplanetX

I could equally say the same about you.

Except it would not be true. I challenge you to find one instance of untruthfulness in any of my posts on ATS.

You could say it, but it would be just another creationist lie. Not a new thing to me; I once had a creationist member create an account with a name almost the same as mine and use it to spam other members’ profile pages with homosexual porn. Offline, another creationist who had once been a friend of mine burnt a book I wrote because it had pictures of Hindu gods and folk rituals in it, and told people I had been taken over by the Devil.

That’s the kind of people I have found creationists to be.

Wow that sucks. I once had an evolutionist smear poop on my brother for mentioning a junk yard getting hit by a tornado and a commercial jet being born out of that. They later made up, because they realized they both believed in tornadoes. Not before my brother peed on him, though.

reply posted on 24-8-2011 @ 02:33 AM by XplanetX

Originally posted by Astyanax
reply to post by XplanetX

I could equally say the same about you.

Except it would not be true. I challenge you to find one instance of untruthfulness in any of my posts on ATS.

You could say it, but it would be just another creationist lie. Not a new thing to me; I once had a creationist member create an account with a name almost the same as mine and use it to spam other members’ profile pages with homosexual porn. Offline, another creationist who had once been a friend of mine burnt a book I wrote because it had pictures of Hindu gods and folk rituals in it, and told people I had been taken over by the Devil.

That’s the kind of people I have found creationists to be.

You seriously think that I could be bothered checking all of your posts just to stroke your ego?
You ain't that important.

reply posted on 24-8-2011 @ 03:12 AM by Gravity215

I would like to point out, that most press release type figureheads who put their own name as part of an organization are simply presenting a script provided to the by Boffins. They generally will not stand up to a whole lot of skepticism and i would suggest that is the case here.

Technical people are almost never the sort who crave the line light, although they do like their idea's and discoveries to be publicized. Ive watched so many presentations by sales people and bureaucratic types in my day to know this. Anybody remember bill gates demo of windows XP where he couldn't make it work?

Ive listened to my bosses in the past make speeches about technical data they had no clue about, mispronouncing words, answering questions with completely inaccurate answers that they had no clue about, all with a complete straight face.

reply posted on 24-8-2011 @ 03:26 AM by randyvs

Wait a sec, creationists can't moderate ? Is this true? Well what shall we do ?

Isn't this called prejudice ?

reply posted on 24-8-2011 @ 03:44 AM by WhoKnows100

Since you like to place the words 'fundamentalism' and 'deny ignorance' together, your post is simply more propaganda itself for "TPTB".

Get over it - that same group were single handedly responsible for removing God from these past two generations. As most of us know, 'they' certainly have lied and manipulated in EVERY other area of our lives! So why wouldn't 'they' have brainwashed people like you to so believe in evolution, to the point that you feel that you must make a separate thread about how ignorant us 'Creationists' are?

For one reason only - so that we couldn't identify our real enemy and most importantly, claim our rightful inheritance to the Kingdom of God. It is that simple. God made us, the Earth and all of the Heavens. Deny Him and He will deny you. Yes buddy, it truly is that simple. 'They' know this - unfortunately years of brainwashing the population has succeeded in people like you not knowing. People are 'waking up' all over the World but are struggling to identify the source. Why? Because they tend to follow the herd and posts like yours simply are meant to lead them astray. I, for one, am so thankful that the veil has lifted and that I was strong enough to break the years of brainwashing -

reply posted on 24-8-2011 @ 06:25 AM by iterationzero

reply to post by randyvs

Agreed, a mod participating as a poster and a mod carrying out their duties as a moderator are two totally separate activities. Saying that a "flag waving creationist" (whatever that means) shouldn't be a mod is tantamount to saying that anyone of strong opinion on any subject shouldn't be permitted to be a mod. Ridiculous.

reply posted on 24-8-2011 @ 12:14 PM by Astyanax

reply to post by XplanetX

You seriously think that I could be bothered checking all of your posts just to stroke your ego?
You ain't that important.

What a sad, creepy, clueless reply. You are basically admitting you called me a liar without ever seeing me lie.

In other words, you lied about me. Well done, creationist.

reply to post by addygrace