It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
A shout of OHHH MY GODDDD ARE YOU SERIOUS? SHE DID? The LED flash of someone Instagramming their entree, followed by look of smug gratification. Some jerk waving his phone around trying to get a cell signal Foursquare. Not anymore! Buzzing DC eatery Rogue24 wants hype to be the only thing in the air, making patrons ink a contract that prohibits the use of phones and cameras during meals. What! Creeping fascism! We should be free to do whatever we'd like in a restaurant, as paying customers! If I want to photograph every calorie I ingest or share my location with an indifferent would, that's my birthright! Right? Sure, it's innocuous, in the same sense that farting in a restaurant doesn't literally kill anyone. But maybe the gadgetization of dinner has come with some costs? I'm sympathetic to that argument, as are famous eateries like New York's exalted Momofuku Ko, which quietly bans phone usage on its website. So, yeah, the idea of a dining contract is incredibly obnoxious—it's a restaurant, not a missile silo. I don't want to have to enter a legal pact in order to eat. But keeping phones in pockets and off tablecloths could be good for food. And for the people you're eating the food with. Remember them?
Creeping fascism!
Originally posted by Anttyk47
reply to post by Domo1
Creeping fascism!
You enter the establishment wanting to eat but instead of being faced with sitting and waiting.
You're faced with sitting, waiting, and signing a contract.
Not using your cellphone is something that you do out of respect. Who needs people to be respectful if you can force them not to do this anyways?
Soon there will be contracts on farting, belching, and attempting to save someones life with the himlech manuver.
Originally posted by Domo1
reply to post by Anttyk47
So don't go to the establishment if you have a problem signing. I think the point of the contract is so that they can actually enforce the rule. Are you saying that you don't believe the owners should be allowed to do this, or just that you think it's a dumb idea?
Originally posted by Domo1
reply to post by Anttyk47
How is it ridiculous to have a no cell phone policy? There are quite a few people that HATE listening to others talk on a phone while trying to enjoy a meal. Certainly the establishment could enforce the policy without a contract, but this gives it extra oomph.
Originally posted by Wertdagf
reply to post by Domo1
yeah lets do crazy things that hurt the profitability of our buisness
this way when the buisness in shut down they can claim its the devil technology and the liberals that ruined it.