It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Sarah Palin's Long Line of Pre-Marital Pregnancy Exposed: Conservative Values?

page: 7
11
<< 4  5  6    8  9 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 17 2011 @ 04:24 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 




posted on Aug, 17 2011 @ 05:47 PM
link   

Originally posted by tangonine
Would you let sarah babysit your kids? I would
Would you let sarah watch the register in your business? I would
Would you hire sarah? I would


What you would get is - A pregnant daughter, empty cash register and an employee who quits mid project.

You'd ask Sarah..."you were babysitting my daughter!! How did she get pregnant! I was only gone an hour!"

Sarah's Answer "I love Jesus, but girls will be girls and her boyfriend dropped by, you betcha!!"

You'd then ask what happened to the money in the cash register...

Sarah's Answer " I only took money to reimburse the travel costs of me and my family to come and watch your register. I also needed to look nice while doing it so I had to buy a new dress as well...uh...and of course my family also needed to look nice while I watched your register and they needed a nice meal as well and their gas money needed to be reimbursed as well....and before you knew it, the register was empty...You Betcha!!!"

And then you'd ask why, oh why, after taking all the money out of the register did she quit mid-day before her shift was over!!

Sarah's Answer: "Well me and my family just got so much attention with our new clothes and all that I realized that I could get paid BIG BUCKS to smile and say things people want me to say....and after all...your cash register is empty. Later!"

Not rhetoric...Historical reality.



posted on Aug, 17 2011 @ 05:54 PM
link   
hahaha,,,,dont be gay but get knocked up like me........



posted on Aug, 17 2011 @ 05:58 PM
link   
Sarah Palin is a moron
and whoever keeps following
these Palin road trips
need to get a life because they
are hitting on the moronic side
theselves..



posted on Aug, 17 2011 @ 06:04 PM
link   
reply to post by Kitilani
 


Was just a simple compare and contrast honeybunch. Don't get your panties in a wad, as they say. That is about all I have to say about all of your posting.



posted on Aug, 17 2011 @ 06:06 PM
link   

Originally posted by thetruthisclearnow
Sarah Palin is a moron
and whoever keeps following
these Palin road trips
need to get a life because they
are hitting on the moronic side
theselves..


If she runs, she has my vote.

Feel free to twist yourself up in knots.



posted on Aug, 17 2011 @ 06:07 PM
link   

Originally posted by Kitilani

Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
If Sarah is advocating keeping babies instead of getting rid of them what's the problem? Oh, right, that is the problem with Progs.


IF that were what she were doing you might have a point.
Too bad it is not.


Oh yes,don't you remember when the Progs said she oughta abort her Down Syndrome baby because Down Syndrome children do not have as much right to be on this earth as their illustrious and perfected selves?


Although they actually hid their hatred of people less perfect than them by saying she was selfish to give the baby life when all they want to do is save it from a life of being Down Syndrome. Just like Margaret Sanger wanted to save poor black women from their babies, and wanted to save the poor black babies from a life of poverty.

After all, Progs are still about eugenics after all these decades. Today's Progs who promote abortion to get rid of Down Syndrome babies sure sound like yesterdays supporters of eugenics. Here is Margaret Sanger on the subject.


The Review printed an excerpt of an address Sanger gave in 1926. In it she said:
It now remains for the U.S. government to set a sensible example to the world by offering a bonus or yearly pension to all obviously unfit parents who allow themselves to be sterilized by harmless and scientific means. In this way the moron and the diseased would have no posterity to inherit their unhappy condition. The number of the feeble-minded would decrease and a heavy burden would be lifted from the shoulders of the fit.13



Sounds like Death Panels to me



edit on 17-8-2011 by ThirdEyeofHorus because: (no reason given)

edit on 17-8-2011 by ThirdEyeofHorus because: (no reason given)

edit on 17-8-2011 by ThirdEyeofHorus because: (no reason given)

edit on 17-8-2011 by ThirdEyeofHorus because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 17 2011 @ 06:26 PM
link   

Originally posted by tangonine
and illegitimate kids aside, I'm voting for her if she runs. So is my wife, and 90% of our county.

We're just simple country folk. We know character when we see it. We know leaders when we see them. You can scream and cry all you like, but the fact remains: she has our vote.


You see character in a quitter?


Do you honestly think the GOP is going to nominate Palin? The TPM has already bailed on her.

But be that as it may...ex gov. Palin isn't going to run so you can't vote for her. However you can buy her books, see her movies, pay to attend her speeches and watch her on Fox. Simple country folk...Sarah knows her demographic. Palin pretty much fails as a politician however she is a brilliant business woman. She has hired the greatest support team to keep her in the limelight just like all entertainers.
edit on 17-8-2011 by whaaa because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 17 2011 @ 06:28 PM
link   

Originally posted by tangonine
We have different points of view. We share different experiences. Fundamentally, I believe in the right of the individual over the collective. There is a LOT in that statement. I believe that Sarah Palin aligns herself with my beliefs more closely than the other candidates (even though she hasn't committed).

I believe barack obama believes in himself, first, and then in the collective because the collective can gain him a new term. I disagree with him on a fundamental level.

It is what it is.


It looks to me like you said Palin and Obama have the same beliefs as you. Perhaps you meant to word that differently?
I would have to say I disagree with you on a very fundamental level. If that is truly what Sarah believes then her attempt to run for political office is quite obviously a lie. Her job as president would no be to ensure your specific rights or hers but those of the collective. She would be president of the whole country and not just you. They are our president whether we vote for them or not and unfortunately we live in a society with other people. If Palin is more worried about her personal freedoms than the rights of the collective, public office is no place for her.



posted on Aug, 17 2011 @ 06:30 PM
link   

Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
reply to post by Kitilani
 


Was just a simple compare and contrast honeybunch. Don't get your panties in a wad, as they say. That is about all I have to say about all of your posting.


No it was just another off topic, crybaby "why arent we bashing Obama in every thread" whiny post just like so many on the boards in any thread about anyone that is not Obama. My name is not honeybunch and you need to get your mind out of my panties.



posted on Aug, 17 2011 @ 06:36 PM
link   
reply to post by Kitilani
 


Well, aren't you just so clever....

You are full of cutesy little statements all ready to bash people over the head. Do you sit around all day thinking up your cute little smart remarks? I keep hoping you will have something less trite to contribute.

I generally don't ask people their age on these forums, but I am wondering if you are borrowing your parents notebook.
edit on 17-8-2011 by ThirdEyeofHorus because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 17 2011 @ 06:53 PM
link   

Originally posted by Kitilani

Originally posted by tangonine
We have different points of view. We share different experiences. Fundamentally, I believe in the right of the individual over the collective. There is a LOT in that statement. I believe that Sarah Palin aligns herself with my beliefs more closely than the other candidates (even though she hasn't committed).

I believe barack obama believes in himself, first, and then in the collective because the collective can gain him a new term. I disagree with him on a fundamental level.

It is what it is.


It looks to me like you said Palin and Obama have the same beliefs as you. Perhaps you meant to word that differently?
I would have to say I disagree with you on a very fundamental level. If that is truly what Sarah believes then her attempt to run for political office is quite obviously a lie. Her job as president would no be to ensure your specific rights or hers but those of the collective. She would be president of the whole country and not just you. They are our president whether we vote for them or not and unfortunately we live in a society with other people. If Palin is more worried about her personal freedoms than the rights of the collective, public office is no place for her.



Her job as president would no be to ensure your specific rights or hers but those of the collective


You going to provide facts to support that accusation? My guess is no, because there aren't any.

The 52%ers voted in the golfer/vacationer in chief. The American puplic is, well, stupid.

If Palin were president I can guarantee you that 3 years into her term she won't have played 80 rounds of golf.

hell, I'm an adjunct professor working half time and I can't find the time to play golf more than once a month and I love golf.
edit on 17-8-2011 by tangonine because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 17 2011 @ 09:05 PM
link   
reply to post by kro32
 


You liberals are all scared of Sarah because she's a STRONG woman and liberals all are scared of strong conservative women, which is why you throw mud on her name because you are a hater.



posted on Aug, 17 2011 @ 09:15 PM
link   
The liberals hate Michelle and Sarah both because they don't subscribe to the Progressive agenda. It really is a very interesting thing to observe.



posted on Aug, 17 2011 @ 09:26 PM
link   
reply to post by ThirdEyeofHorus
 


Exactly. They try and say she's a slut because she kept her baby instead of aborting him, and now they pretend like they have Christian values? Where were they will Bill Clinton was cheating on his wife??! If Sara Palin had some sex before she got married, how is it a liberals business? Oh, because they are hyprites and hate her!



posted on Aug, 17 2011 @ 09:28 PM
link   
reply to post by kro32
 



yeah thats why she mouths off to everyone else about it...yanno cos her family have got such a long history of *cough unconservative behaviour....



posted on Aug, 17 2011 @ 11:49 PM
link   

Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
The liberals hate Michelle and Sarah both because they don't subscribe to the Progressive agenda. It really is a very interesting thing to observe.


You swear


I dislike them because they are nasty, manipulative, tarts, that is at a base level.
On another level I dislike Sarah because she is of average intelligence at best, Michelle
is intelligent, but subscribes to the idiot speak that mesmerizes the theocratic, totalitarian clan.
If the TEA party is the answer to Bush's failure, these two sure try real hard to steal his shtick
and ideas.

Now, on an intellectual level, I think both ladies do not have the capacity to have any original,
non corporate ideas
edit on 17-8-2011 by Janky Red because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 18 2011 @ 01:11 AM
link   

Originally posted by tangonine

Originally posted by Kitilani

Originally posted by tangonine
We have different points of view. We share different experiences. Fundamentally, I believe in the right of the individual over the collective. There is a LOT in that statement. I believe that Sarah Palin aligns herself with my beliefs more closely than the other candidates (even though she hasn't committed).

I believe barack obama believes in himself, first, and then in the collective because the collective can gain him a new term. I disagree with him on a fundamental level.

It is what it is.


It looks to me like you said Palin and Obama have the same beliefs as you. Perhaps you meant to word that differently?
I would have to say I disagree with you on a very fundamental level. If that is truly what Sarah believes then her attempt to run for political office is quite obviously a lie. Her job as president would no be to ensure your specific rights or hers but those of the collective. She would be president of the whole country and not just you. They are our president whether we vote for them or not and unfortunately we live in a society with other people. If Palin is more worried about her personal freedoms than the rights of the collective, public office is no place for her.



Her job as president would no be to ensure your specific rights or hers but those of the collective


You going to provide facts to support that accusation? My guess is no, because there aren't any.



Um....

uh...

um....

What accusation is that?



posted on Aug, 18 2011 @ 01:12 AM
link   
post removed for serious violation of ATS Terms & Conditions



posted on Aug, 18 2011 @ 01:14 AM
link   

Originally posted by tangonine
The 52%ers voted in the golfer/vacationer in chief. The American puplic is, well, stupid.


Bush? I didn't vote for him.


If Palin were president I can guarantee you that 3 years into her term she won't have played 80 rounds of golf.


Guess what your guarantee is worth to me.


hell, I'm an adjunct professor working half time and I can't find the time to play golf more than once a month and I love golf.
edit on 17-8-2011 by tangonine because: (no reason given)


Sucks to be you. You sound jealous. If you do not get enough vacation time that is no one's fault but yours. The "personal accountability" crowd sure does get whiny when someone else has something they do not have. Maybe you would like it better if Obama spread his vacation around, shared it with all the people? Socialist!




top topics



 
11
<< 4  5  6    8  9 >>

log in

join