It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by tangonine
Would you let sarah babysit your kids? I would
Would you let sarah watch the register in your business? I would
Would you hire sarah? I would
Originally posted by thetruthisclearnow
Sarah Palin is a moron
and whoever keeps following
these Palin road trips
need to get a life because they
are hitting on the moronic side
theselves..
Originally posted by Kitilani
Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
If Sarah is advocating keeping babies instead of getting rid of them what's the problem? Oh, right, that is the problem with Progs.
IF that were what she were doing you might have a point.
Too bad it is not.
The Review printed an excerpt of an address Sanger gave in 1926. In it she said:
It now remains for the U.S. government to set a sensible example to the world by offering a bonus or yearly pension to all obviously unfit parents who allow themselves to be sterilized by harmless and scientific means. In this way the moron and the diseased would have no posterity to inherit their unhappy condition. The number of the feeble-minded would decrease and a heavy burden would be lifted from the shoulders of the fit.13
Originally posted by tangonine
and illegitimate kids aside, I'm voting for her if she runs. So is my wife, and 90% of our county.
We're just simple country folk. We know character when we see it. We know leaders when we see them. You can scream and cry all you like, but the fact remains: she has our vote.
Originally posted by tangonine
We have different points of view. We share different experiences. Fundamentally, I believe in the right of the individual over the collective. There is a LOT in that statement. I believe that Sarah Palin aligns herself with my beliefs more closely than the other candidates (even though she hasn't committed).
I believe barack obama believes in himself, first, and then in the collective because the collective can gain him a new term. I disagree with him on a fundamental level.
It is what it is.
Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
reply to post by Kitilani
Was just a simple compare and contrast honeybunch. Don't get your panties in a wad, as they say. That is about all I have to say about all of your posting.
Originally posted by Kitilani
Originally posted by tangonine
We have different points of view. We share different experiences. Fundamentally, I believe in the right of the individual over the collective. There is a LOT in that statement. I believe that Sarah Palin aligns herself with my beliefs more closely than the other candidates (even though she hasn't committed).
I believe barack obama believes in himself, first, and then in the collective because the collective can gain him a new term. I disagree with him on a fundamental level.
It is what it is.
It looks to me like you said Palin and Obama have the same beliefs as you. Perhaps you meant to word that differently?
I would have to say I disagree with you on a very fundamental level. If that is truly what Sarah believes then her attempt to run for political office is quite obviously a lie. Her job as president would no be to ensure your specific rights or hers but those of the collective. She would be president of the whole country and not just you. They are our president whether we vote for them or not and unfortunately we live in a society with other people. If Palin is more worried about her personal freedoms than the rights of the collective, public office is no place for her.
Her job as president would no be to ensure your specific rights or hers but those of the collective
Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
The liberals hate Michelle and Sarah both because they don't subscribe to the Progressive agenda. It really is a very interesting thing to observe.
Originally posted by tangonine
Originally posted by Kitilani
Originally posted by tangonine
We have different points of view. We share different experiences. Fundamentally, I believe in the right of the individual over the collective. There is a LOT in that statement. I believe that Sarah Palin aligns herself with my beliefs more closely than the other candidates (even though she hasn't committed).
I believe barack obama believes in himself, first, and then in the collective because the collective can gain him a new term. I disagree with him on a fundamental level.
It is what it is.
It looks to me like you said Palin and Obama have the same beliefs as you. Perhaps you meant to word that differently?
I would have to say I disagree with you on a very fundamental level. If that is truly what Sarah believes then her attempt to run for political office is quite obviously a lie. Her job as president would no be to ensure your specific rights or hers but those of the collective. She would be president of the whole country and not just you. They are our president whether we vote for them or not and unfortunately we live in a society with other people. If Palin is more worried about her personal freedoms than the rights of the collective, public office is no place for her.
Her job as president would no be to ensure your specific rights or hers but those of the collective
You going to provide facts to support that accusation? My guess is no, because there aren't any.
Originally posted by tangonine
The 52%ers voted in the golfer/vacationer in chief. The American puplic is, well, stupid.
If Palin were president I can guarantee you that 3 years into her term she won't have played 80 rounds of golf.
hell, I'm an adjunct professor working half time and I can't find the time to play golf more than once a month and I love golf.edit on 17-8-2011 by tangonine because: (no reason given)