It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

At last! Evidence that Elenin is NO threat! From the man himself!

page: 3
20
<< 1  2   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 17 2011 @ 11:38 AM
link   

Originally posted by DocEmrick
While I'm skeptical about the Elenin fiasco, I'd hardly call this evidence when plenty of people question Leo Elenin's existence in the first place.

I can confirm his observations, in fact I half wonder if he got the idea of applying the 1999 RQ176 encounter in this manner from my postings on other boards back in May. Just because people claim he's part of the conspiracy due to their own personal biases about his name or what have you, does not mean his existence is actually suspect or that it's valid to disregard the information he presents simply because others claim you should. In short, so what if they question his existence? His evidence is still evidence unless they can actually prove it's invalid.
edit on 17-8-2011 by ngchunter because: (no reason given)




posted on Aug, 17 2011 @ 12:46 PM
link   
reply to post by ngchunter
 


I definitely agree with you, and understand, but what I was getting at is if nobody will even accept his existence, there's really no point in citing discoveries by him.



posted on Aug, 17 2011 @ 10:20 PM
link   

Originally posted by Xcalibur254
reply to post by KSprepared
 


Can you please provide a summary? I don't want to spend 12 minutes watching a video that is just going to end up being bad astronomy.


Watch from 8 minutes on. He thinks that because he can see Saturn, he should be able to see the coma.



posted on Aug, 18 2011 @ 04:58 AM
link   

Our Sun is a white dwarf star


No, it isn't. The Sun is classed as a G2 yellow dwarf. A white dwarf is the superdense remnant of a dying star's core, which (ironically) the Sun will become several billion years from now.



posted on Aug, 18 2011 @ 05:27 AM
link   

Originally posted by LightAssassin
I especially like your suggestion of 'testing'.


If you like that, then have a think about this...

What exactly did Obama say on May 1st?



st.



posted on Aug, 18 2011 @ 06:16 AM
link   
reply to post by SatoriTheory
 


I just listened to the whole speech, unless you're hinting at him saying they've killed Bin Laden I didnt pick up anything else he may have been suggesting at.



posted on Aug, 18 2011 @ 07:57 AM
link   
reply to post by LightAssassin
 


The message uses symbolism as a kind of code. It's all in the picture.
You don't need to listen to the whole speech, you just need to interpret the basic message.

st.

edit on 18-8-2011 by SatoriTheory because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 18 2011 @ 08:03 PM
link   
reply to post by SatoriTheory
 


I see it, but I think the message isn't for the general populace...it's for the elite.
2nd.



posted on Aug, 19 2011 @ 03:54 AM
link   
reply to post by LightAssassin
 


Yeah it could be. I don't know. It's a small part of something I have noticed.
But then I could just be going nuts and seeing things, which is probably more plausible!


st.



new topics

top topics



 
20
<< 1  2   >>

log in

join