reply to post by Stovokor
The scriptures might not be a scientific book, but it is scientifically accurate. www.clarifyingchristianity.com...
‘For the life of the flesh is in the blood' (too bad our brilliant scientists/doctors who not long ago drained blood to help people get better....
Not to smart...)
"And God made the beast of the earth according to its kind," (there has never been a witnessed in recorded history the birth of a crocodile by a
frog. Or a shark from a bass. As much as evolutionist hate this one... common sense wins again, don't need much test tubes to easily see this one,
but you do need A LOT of creative logic.
For He draws up drops of water,
Which distill as rain from the mist,
Which the clouds drop down
And pour abundantly on man.
Indeed, can anyone understand the spreading of clouds,
The thunder from His canopy?
(The hydrolic Cycle)
Have you entered the springs of the sea?
Or have you walked in search of the depths?
These vents were discovered within the last 100 years, science finally catching up to the bible!
Evolution is not a scientific theory either, and it's a faith filled guess with no solid evidence to back it up. It lacks common sense, reason and
it's void of any real facts.
Common Sense Arguments:
- Mutations kill or sterilize the species
- There is NO accurate dating methods used, all have been proven grossly inaccurate but still highly regarded by all religious atheists since it's
really all they have (nothing)
-The moon is going away. so from the rate of departure, it would have hit us 30,000 years ago. Millions not an option
-The sun is shrinking, fast. It's going at about 5ft per hour now (.1% every 10 years), and probably faster earlier when it had more surface area.
for a 6,000 year old earth this is only a 6% gain in circumference, not a big deal (especially if the canopy theory is correct, annnnnd it is). For
evolutionists that need millions of years to sound intelligent, the sun would double in size just 100,000 years back; which would be like starting
life on earth in the middle of a bonfire.... www.icr.org...
-Biggest reef is less than 4,000 years old (great barrier reef) www.answersingenesis.org...
-Biggest desert on earth (Sahara) is only 4000 years old (FLOOD was 4k ago)
- Oldest tree about 4000 years old (hmmmm…)
Dinosaurs living with Man? YES, but ‘dinosaur’ is a recent term, they were called Giant Lizards/dragons 200 years ago.
Lists of evidence for the common nay-sayer: www.dinosaursandman.com...
- Common accounts among all cultures have dragon encounters that picture dinosaurs in description
- Live tissue from dinosaurs have been found multiple times. www.smithsonianmag.com...
- Foot prints of man and dinosaurs have been found next to each other
- Recent pictures of men with dinosaurs have been found in every old culture around the world.
- Natives that do not care about the evolution/creation debate and visitors claim to have seen dinosaurs in Africa’s largest swamp, and accounts
from Lockness and other freshwater bodies of water around the world regularly.
More evidence can be gained from their remains. The brontosaurus had nostrils that are far too small to actually support the giant animal in
today’s 785 Nitrogen and 21% oxygen environment. There had to be a much denser oxygen atmosphere back then.
- Reptiles do not stop growing till they die. www.nytimes.com...
- If the canopy theory was correct (a giant ice canopy that pressurized the air condensing oxygen molecules and block lots of harmful radiation from
the sun), and there’s tons of evidence to support it, the earth was basically a hyperbolic chamber. Reptiles could grow to enormous sizes, and
probably many other species as well. This theory is further supported by the super recovering effects of higher oxygen levels in an increased
atmospheric pressurized environment (Hyperbolic Chamber). And by the rapid aging effects of less presser shown in astronauts after their return. This
would also help solve the fact that there are fossilized forests under both poles where not life lives. A canopy would keep it temperate all over the
I could go on, but I think this is enough. I’m sure there’s a number of points here that can be argued and would be hard to prove either way, but
I doubt anyone could explain the biggest proof of a young earth, Shrinking sun. If you would like more evidence on any of these topics, you can find
both sides to the arguments on google. Atheists try so hard to keep their religion a float… But I urge you to look at all the facts and use common
sense to come to the conclusion that you were in fact created, you are not a mutated monkey that came from a rock. There is a Creator that Is who HE
Is, and many people have misrepresented H-m, but HE will not bend to what any finite man thinks or does. You can find H-M in the scriptures, I
recommend starting in Genesis and not asking anyone else to interpret what you are reading till you get to Revelations. If it doesn’t scare you,
and give you hope once you know the Creator, try again.