It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
you remember that tea party thing? that started as a good idea and then went off the rails? it went something like that. starting with paypal. notice thats when this new (i believe CIA) anonymous began going after the people and not the "censors" but we all know we will never accept a genuine killswitch unless we ask for it. it would be in a hack attack that everyone was mad over, or widespread rioting (i hear britain is well on the way to a killswitch as we speak, even grasping at cell shutdown capabilities) point is, think about how easy it would be to subvert and destroy anonymous, then how easy it would be to control it for a while as you make it do what you need. which way is more "neo-con?"
Originally posted by iforget reply to post by stainlesssteelratHey rat say Hi to Angela for mesource Its a mixed message that depends on what part of Anonymous you ask
Anonymous has denied that it is organizing or supporting an official attack on Facebook, but acknowledged that hackers associated with the group are pursuing the endeavor. "To press ... #OpFacebook is just another fake! We don't 'kill' the messenger. That's not our style," the @anonops Twitter feed tweeted early this morning. About two hours later, however, the group followed up by saying that "#OpFacebook is being organised by some Anons. This does not necessarily mean that all of #Anonymous agrees with it." Those mixed messages, of course, highlight the inherent difficulties in trying to track the activities of Anonymous. Given that the group is a loose collective of hackers with no central authority, anyone who says they are a part of Anonymous is a part of Anonymous. As a result, if a few people get together in the name of Anonymous and decide to hack Facebook on November 5, Anonymous is behind the planned Facebook hack.
Originally posted by GenerationXisMarching
point is, think about how easy it would be to subvert and destroy anonymous, then how easy it would be to control it for a while as you make it do what you need.