It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by petrus4
a] That the civilian population both of America and other countries, do not feel that any legitimate defense of anyone's freedom has been accomplished by the invasions of Afghanistan or Iraq.
Originally posted by petrus4
c] That in said conflicts, the American military has essentially served as corporate mercenaries.
Originally posted by petrus4
d] it isn't actually civilians who can't handle the truth, but the soldiers.
Originally posted by ddaniel
Originally posted by kro32
reply to post by SirClem
You know what I am implying. Since world war 2 the United States has been the most powerful country economically and militarily. You man not agree with all the policies but that is simply a fact. We did not get that way by staying at home and not spreading our influence around the world.
For someone with the Constitution in your avatar, you are unimaginably ignorant of this nation's history. We became the most powerful country in the world because we outproduced everyone. We created goods and services that others deemed important enough to purchase, giving us vast wealth and influence. Now we have all of our production being shipped overseas, and look how great our economy is doing.
edit on 16-8-2011 by ddaniel because: remove vulgarity
Originally posted by Wyn Hawks
...actually, the corporate mercenaries are the independent contractors like blackwater (or whatever they call themselves now)...
Originally posted by RedGod
Originally posted by Wyn Hawks
...actually, the corporate mercenaries are the independent contractors like blackwater (or whatever they call themselves now)...
Xi International.
They may have changed the name, but the company is the same bunch'a thug mercs as before.
Originally posted by kro32
reply to post by SirClem
I assume you can show us what resources we are getting out of Iraq and Afghanistan and how much of it then.
I await your information.
Originally posted by RedGod
That being said, I agree with most of what you posted there. The only problem I really have with it is that, while we may not be fighting for the safety and security of Americans (besides the other soldiers anyway) we are saving lives and bringing people to a better quality of life. I wouldn't say these things, mind you, if I hadn't actually witnessed it with my own eyes. And before it's said, yes civilians have been killed in these wars as well, I know. That's a discussion for another place however, don't want to derail this thread.
Originally posted by petrus4
Please try to understand the difference. Don't keep taking the paternalistic approach and treating us like idiots or children. If we're wrong about the way we're perceiving things, TELL US, in specific ways.
Originally posted by kro32
It's referred to as the Bush Doctine and its a valid National Policy.
This theory allows us to intervene and prevent things before they get to that point. Yes there is fighting and deaths involved however it is assumed that it will be far less than having to go to all out war in the future as happened in the past during ww1 and ww2.
The economic cost of the war has been estimated at US$1500 billion. Of this, the US spent 21%, Britain 20%, Germany 18% and the USSR 13%. (Source: The Penguin Atlas of World History ; Hermann Kinder and Werner Hilgemann; Originally published as Atlas zur Weltgeschichte). Read more: wiki.answers.com...
Originally posted by Evanzsayz
reply to post by petrus4
If a soldier said that to my face, he would be laying on the ground knocked out with a split lip for thinking hes better than me