It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by filosophia
I agree minimum wage laws should be repealed but Ron Paul also believes that and he also believes in ending the IRS and federal reserve so until Bachmann jumps on that bandwagon I'm not too convinced she will be any different from Obama claiming to bring home the troops and then turning 180 on that promise.
Originally posted by e11888
Originally posted by filosophia
I agree minimum wage laws should be repealed but Ron Paul also believes that and he also believes in ending the IRS and federal reserve so until Bachmann jumps on that bandwagon I'm not too convinced she will be any different from Obama claiming to bring home the troops and then turning 180 on that promise.
Bachmann bringing home troops? After watching the debate it seems like she was ready to march into Iran day one.
This is another thing that I simply cannot understand. Americans want to bring our troops home but Ron Paul is the only person on that stage that wants to actually do it... yet he has no electability?
Originally posted by e11888
It makes no logical sense to pay Bill that sits on his butt all day and complaines the same wage as Bob that busts his ass and actually helps a business compete.
You have to understand that we live in a free market and that competition is the center block of it all.
Originally posted by e11888
reply to post by petrus4
So really this is all about making sure the people that dont want to work are given a free lunch ticket so that they dont commit crime... isnt that why our population is supposed to be armed?
The American dream that is now dead because we have to cater to corporate interests or the guy too lazy to put in his fair share.
You know what happens in nature when an animal refuses to put in the work to survive? It dies. It doesnt get handed a food stamp card to go buy food. It doesnt get handed shelter to protect it from the cold. It dies. I know this seems like an extreme but we live in a world that isnt exactly kind.
Id love to see the people that lived in farming communities in the 1700s told that if they didnt work hard they would be given a food stamp card. They would call you insane.edit on 15-8-2011 by e11888 because: (no reason given)
reply to post by Misoir
3. How does eliminating the minimum wage allow for employees to be given more than they could imagine? If the minimum wage is the bottom line and it is not like a tax or mass of fees, then taking that away would in no way raise incomes.
Originally posted by James1982
reply to post by the owlbear
I don't think Paul is against minimum wage. I think he is against a FEDERALLY MANDATED minimum wage. He wants it left up to the states, as it should be. The federal government has no right to dictate what a state's minimum wage should be.
Anyway,
This woman is a complete moron. She, like most right wingers and conservatives, have a VERY warped view on how the world works. Just like that idiot Reagan, trickle down economics DOES NOT WORK.
We have proof time and time again, that if you give corporations and big business more money, they just want MORE MONEY. It's completely ridiculous to think that the more money they make, the more they will share with their employers. It doesn't work that way. Companies don't give a crap about their employees, they want slaves that cost them as little as possible. If you get rid of minimum wage, you will have companies paying people $3 an hour.
Oh yeah, richest, most prosperous country in the world. Where the republicans and conservatives want people to be slaves that do nothing but work (for 80 hours a week, can't afford a place to live, food to eat, not to mention medical care) from productive ages of 16-35, then promptly DIE as to not be a drain on society. All while the super rich keep getting richer, and keep saying "IF YOU GIVE ME MORE MONEY IT WILL HELP OUT EVERYBODY" When we know for a fact that's NOT how it works.
Whoever came up with this economic model where allowing the rich to get richer at the cost of your average person's quality of life, in the sick twisted hope that they will pay their workers more should be shot. And anyone that believes in that crap is too mentally lacking to be of any use to the world.edit on 14-8-2011 by James1982 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Rockpuck
reply to post by Misoir
3. How does eliminating the minimum wage allow for employees to be given more than they could imagine? If the minimum wage is the bottom line and it is not like a tax or mass of fees, then taking that away would in no way raise incomes.
Hypothetically, if you reduce the minimum wage to either something very low, or nothing at all, it would indeed spur mass economic growth and virtually eliminate unemployment.. wages would then increasingly gain momentum because employers would be forced to compete for skilled labor as all skilled labor would be employed.
However...
This does not work with mass immigration.. because you always have a huge stockpile of workers willing to work for less than the next, and an endless supply willing to travel to this labor market.
The minimum wage being as high as it is (almost $9/hr here) stiffles economic growth big time.. start ups and small businesses are the main employers in this country, quite often they simply cannot afford to hire help because minimum wage requirements are so damn high. For instance I would love to hire an employee to assist me in my work, but if I did, my employee would probably end up making more than me once wages, taxes and overhead are considered. The government gives me no room to move.
Also, consider: Because minimum wages have been increasing year over year (many states adopted inflation adjusted hikes) it slowly deteriorates the wage base of virutally every wage above it until you get past the 100k/yr wages. Most jobs are not increasing their wages, so every penny increased in the minimum wage is a decrease in their pay. Essentially this lowers the overall broader earnings of the entire working and middle class.
Minimum wages are nothing more than manipulations of the economy to make it appear there is wage growth and wealth inflation among the entire populace, even if all the "growth" is centered entirely on the lowest income class.
Originally posted by e11888
I do have to agree on a few aspects of abolishing minimum wage. I personally believe that a man or woman in The United States should be paid based on their level of skill, knowledge and expertise in any given area as well as the performance shown on any given job. It makes no logical sense to pay Bill that sits on his butt all day and complaines the same wage as Bob that busts his ass and actually helps a business compete. Now we can eliminate Bill's wage altogether by terminating his employment, but we cant lower his wage to more accurately reflect his contribution to the company. This is the part that makes absolutely no sense to me. Its almost like we are protecting the people that are too stupid to up and quit the job themselves.
You have to understand that we live in a free market and that competition is the center block of it all. If the burger place across the road is paying their employees $1 more than the other place well everyone is going to want to work for the man paying more. The other joint will eventually have to raise his wage or risk losing competent employees. Now picture that on a GLOBAL scale. Its the same as what would have happend if we didnt bail out those banks. New branches would have sprung up when those banks went under and took over the market. The problem is when you start dictating (ala dictatorship see dictate) the way a business should run or show favortism towards certain aspects of the market (obamacare), you no longer have competition and in turn you no longer have a free market.
So should there be a minimum wage in this country? Why should there be when competition and the market itself will dictate the minimum wage? Why do we need Government to tell us how to run our lives (or for that matter our business) in a free market?
For the record I do not support Bachmann (nor would I ever considering she voted for The Patriot Act).edit on 15-8-2011 by e11888 because: (no reason given)