reply to post by stereologist
Only a portion of his findings were involved in a discrediting attempt because the maintenance supplying the artifact happened well along in his
study. That's not what I find most interesting about that section of sky, though. It's his many revisions of data as though something else was
operating there that was unknown and the flare which is unexplained. He finally came to the conclusion that there were two giant planets instead of
one and the flare was observed after his death so his input on that wasn't there. Ophiuchus is all around an interesting section of sky even to the
myths of the coffin and the dead coming to life, which have been around a lot longer then the guy with the Hercolubus book.





