It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Gorman91
reply to post by Kryties
What you have to realize is this. War is not a place for hearts.
No one ever won a war by caring about civilians. That's why war is evil and it is the chief priority of men to prevent it.
Originally posted by Gorman91
reply to post by Kryties
What you have to realize is this. War is not a place for hearts.
No one ever won a war by caring about civilians. That's why war is evil and it is the chief priority of men to prevent it.
Originally posted by Gorman91
reply to post by pshea38
yea, no. US has a half-way relationship with England, with a borderline "awesome" military relationship.
What happened was that in the 60s, a very bad group captured the presidency. They've lost and gained power on and off since then, and as we see in this current situation, they lost the power to Obama, a different political sect. Obama's sect could be compared to federalists, whom basically just continue what the last president did. Obama in every sense of the word is a federalist. Look them up. Now the funny irony here is that the sect that I was talking about from the 60s has not only lost power of the presidency, but now they are loosing the republican party as well.
Currently a new sect is growing, this sect is known as the New Apostolic Reformation. It includes people such as Perry, Palin, and Bachmann. This election is a decisive one for the republican party. See the neocons are loosing power altogether, as this NAR replaces them. Many neocons have flat out changed their clothes and joined it. The NAR is not going to win however, because another sect, presumably led by Paul, is capturing it first. The neocons therefore are very angry cause they are pretty much failing at everything right now.
But this is all very off topic.edit on 15-8-2011 by Gorman91 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by BobAthome
first i would like too respond, to the statement "that God would not for give him",
He is forgiven.
He loved God,
loved his fellow man,
he could no longer go against,
what he truly believed in.
Believe in me,, said ,,Jesus,,and you will be mine.
Forgiven,,and then some.
Originally posted by Hawking
Originally posted by BobAthome
first i would like too respond, to the statement "that God would not for give him",
He is forgiven.
He loved God,
loved his fellow man,
he could no longer go against,
what he truly believed in.
Believe in me,, said ,,Jesus,,and you will be mine.
Forgiven,,and then some.
So you can kill your fellow man, apologize and be absolved? How many people can I kill before I can't apologize the blame away?
Man what a confusing religion - full of sin, damnation, repentance and forgiveness. Guess Hell's only real if you can't say you're sorry...edit on 15-8-2011 by Hawking because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Evanzsayz
reply to post by TupacShakur
Your right, I would pick any of those people over any soldier of the US of A
Originally posted by darrman
some of our young men have " killed " too young......
as long as one UNDERSTANDS ,,only one thing--- murder and KILLING are TWO different things..
it helps....
the people who CANT seperate those two things,,,,,,,,, have the HARDEST time with it
Definition of MURDER
1: the crime of unlawfully killing a person especially with malice aforethought
Originally posted by adifferentbreed
reply to post by Mahatmacoat
I guess you missed all of the other threads this last week, this is nothing but more of the same and hell yes I'm pissed. There really is nothing to debate, what you said was inflammatory and implied wrong doing on his part without knowing the story, typical. I think I'm done with ATS as it's merely a shell of itself taken over by left wing anti American glad handers, I bid you good day.
Originally posted by newcovenant
reply to post by Kryties
I haven't been following the discourse that closely but think going from just the above post, you deserve applause as well. Collateral damage is murder of innocent people. How is that better than what was done by terrorists to us? If indeed it was terrorists. I highly doubt it personally but, that is for another thread. ...so the applause and thumbs up to gorman is for you too. Peace bro. We could certainly use a little.
the life of one American soldier is worth more than an entire country full of Afghanis
This is a statement made by an idiot. I think I am far enough from the original poor misguided source of this inane declaration to say that without getting censured. He or she is warped in their mentality and thinking. I don't believe this person represents a majority of Americans although I must admit it does seem to represent an awful lot of them. And I do mean awful.edit on 15-8-2011 by newcovenant because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by gabby2011
reply to post by drew1749
more like "boyz club" type intiations... that are not part of duty.