It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Jakes51
reply to post by JennaDarling
Oh yes, the stealth fighters being grounded? The grounded stealth fighters are still in development, and not operational as of late. The F-22 and the F-35 are not ready for deployment yet. They could have been grounded for a myriad of reasons, but that does not make them any less efficient when the kinks are worked out of them. It takes time to phase in technology. Trials and tribulations are bound to arise. Still, the technology is crucial to National Defense, and force projection. Why do you think China or the Russians are going out of their way to develop it?
The technology is not infallible, and yes it can be defeated with tactics. However, the current track recorded for such technology with the current assets in the United State's arsenal has been impeccable. That is fact. If I recall only one such aircraft was lost in the Balkans. It was attributed to good tactics by the Yugoslav Army. However, with that being mentioned, their operational record speaks for itself. Look it up, and you will see. The advantage remains as strong as ever, because the Russians and the Chinese are scrambling to develop operational stealth technology. How long that will last remains to be seen, but at present the US owns the skies. That is fact.
Originally posted by GLaDOS
Well, the US came into their country with out asking, they have a right to do what ever they want with the equipment.
Originally posted by HellstormRising
reply to post by JennaDarling
Well, seeing as most of that you can't really prove aside from the accidental killing of civilians and allies. I think you're still missing the point. It doesn't matter which country you look at they all spy on each other, they all slander each other and use propaganda to achieve their goal. Regular people are no different it just goes by a different word called MANIPULATION! I know you have only been here since July but if there is one piece of advice I can give to you it's try to read more up on what you're commenting on before saying and only speak when your posts can contribute to the conversation that is posted.
On Topic, Pakistan has been given a ton of aid over the years and continue to get handouts from the U.S. (along with many other countries). I'm sure we get some kickbacks but for them to share this technology knowing full well that the U.S. is going be hurt by it in some way then the Pakistani government has been long bought by the Chinese and we should be very careful about what we say to them, pull our forces that are there helping secure the border and stop selling arms to them along with giving money like we've been doing over the past 15 years.
Originally posted by JennaDarling
Originally posted by Jakes51
reply to post by JennaDarling
Oh yes, the stealth fighters being grounded? The grounded stealth fighters are still in development, and not operational as of late. The F-22 and the F-35 are not ready for deployment yet. They could have been grounded for a myriad of reasons, but that does not make them any less efficient when the kinks are worked out of them. It takes time to phase in technology. Trials and tribulations are bound to arise. Still, the technology is crucial to National Defense, and force projection. Why do you think China or the Russians are going out of their way to develop it?
The technology is not infallible, and yes it can be defeated with tactics. However, the current track recorded for such technology with the current assets in the United State's arsenal has been impeccable. That is fact. If I recall only one such aircraft was lost in the Balkans. It was attributed to good tactics by the Yugoslav Army. However, with that being mentioned, their operational record speaks for itself. Look it up, and you will see. The advantage remains as strong as ever, because the Russians and the Chinese are scrambling to develop operational stealth technology. How long that will last remains to be seen, but at present the US owns the skies. That is fact.
Yes you do, but at what cost? It has bankrupted you all, it is not sustainable, it has also made you the number 1 target in the world, may aswell paint a bullseye on your backs.
China has the means to catch up, not just in military, but in every day life, they are building infrastructure around the country like nobody can, just as the middle east is pumping their oil money into their countries future, as they know it will change one day, they are planning to move to the next phase like they should once the existing way dries up whether it be oil, manufacturing cheap labour or what not.
Technology can only go so far without friends and a stable way of funding it.
Pakistan lets China see US helicopter
Originally posted by gortex
Pakistan lets China see US helicopter
Why shouldn't China see it , they own it
Originally posted by wdkirk
reply to post by JennaDarling
That speaks volumes about the rest of the world and China as far as development goes.
Not sure that was your intention though.edit on 14-8-2011 by wdkirk because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by HellstormRising
reply to post by JennaDarling
JennaDarling, I've read many of your posts and they seem to be pretty linear in the sense that everything that comes out of your mouth is off topic and U.S. Bashing. Please get real and realize that regardless of whose chopper it was it went down and Pakistan is supposed to be an ally. Clearly Pakistan is two faced and sharing information with an economic competitor to the U.S. It's bad because it's quite obvious that China wants to become a military equal to the U.S. It's also very troublesome because if you think that U.S. is bad as far as bullying and human rights etc just wait until the Chinese are the military and economic powerhouse. At that point we're all in trouble.
America funds many external projects, gives food, aid (military and economic), as well as openly engage in normal trade with many countries and you sit here and defame them because of a few bad apples. We're not all arrogant, potbellied, lazy pricks bent on destroying the world.
It was shameful for Pakistan to share the technology that we let them hold in good faith to the American people. We should pull all funding from Pakistan and see how quickly they run to other countries for aid.
Sometimes isolationism can be a good thing, depends on the world atmosphere.
Originally posted by Iwinder
Originally posted by HellstormRising
reply to post by JennaDarling
JennaDarling, I've read many of your posts and they seem to be pretty linear in the sense that everything that comes out of your mouth is off topic and U.S. Bashing. Please get real and realize that regardless of whose chopper it was it went down and Pakistan is supposed to be an ally. Clearly Pakistan is two faced and sharing information with an economic competitor to the U.S. It's bad because it's quite obvious that China wants to become a military equal to the U.S. It's also very troublesome because if you think that U.S. is bad as far as bullying and human rights etc just wait until the Chinese are the military and economic powerhouse. At that point we're all in trouble.
America funds many external projects, gives food, aid (military and economic), as well as openly engage in normal trade with many countries and you sit here and defame them because of a few bad apples. We're not all arrogant, potbellied, lazy pricks bent on destroying the world.
It was shameful for Pakistan to share the technology that we let them hold in good faith to the American people. We should pull all funding from Pakistan and see how quickly they run to other countries for aid.
Sometimes isolationism can be a good thing, depends on the world atmosphere.
Correct me if I am wrong but was not Iraq an ally of the US at one time?
I think it is almost more dangerous to be an ally than an enemy......You can't dictate to an enemy but you sure can bully an ally to do your bidding.
Regards, Iwinderedit on 14-8-2011 by Iwinder because: (no reason given)