It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Hysterical Michele Bachmann flees teenage gay activist

page: 8
50
<< 5  6  7    9  10  11 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 14 2011 @ 12:17 PM
link   
reply to post by kozmo
 





I realized that you were talking about something that doesn't exist, namely separation of Church and State, so I put on a clinic on the Constitution which you failed to comprehend. Marriage, as defined by law, is one man and one woman. Whatever you want to do behind closed doors is your business, so keep it there!


ohboyherewegoagain.avi


Believing with you that religion is a matter which lies solely between Man & his God, that he owes account to none other for his faith or his worship, that the legitimate powers of government reach actions only, & not opinions, I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should "make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof", thus building a wall of separation between Church & State.


- Thomas Jefferson, 1802

Separation of Church and state doesn't exist? lol




posted on Aug, 14 2011 @ 12:18 PM
link   
reply to post by kozmo
 





Oh, I see... she is crazy because she didn't address a heckler. Got it! Also, you didn't know Huffington post was a liberal blog trash site? So, you were the last to know. Everyone else is well aware.


She is crazy because she signed a pledge that she would want to ban all porn if possible.

The Huffington Post is a great site in my opinion. I guess we have differing opinions here.



posted on Aug, 14 2011 @ 12:18 PM
link   

Originally posted by Stovokor
Why are small government conservatives like Bachmann more than willing to stick their government nose in our lives?




Good question and it illustrates the hypocrisy of most politicians. They want smaller government with less interference in our personal lives, but yet go out of their way to interfere in our personal lives. I've no problem with gay marriage. But right now the law states that marriage is between one man and one woman. I suspect her religious beliefs prevent her from seeing the light. That being said, there are certainly better ways for gays to fight for their cause without having to call such negative attention to themselves.



posted on Aug, 14 2011 @ 12:22 PM
link   

Originally posted by drew1749
reply to post by kozmo
 





I realized that you were talking about something that doesn't exist, namely separation of Church and State, so I put on a clinic on the Constitution which you failed to comprehend. Marriage, as defined by law, is one man and one woman. Whatever you want to do behind closed doors is your business, so keep it there!


ohboyherewegoagain.avi


Believing with you that religion is a matter which lies solely between Man & his God, that he owes account to none other for his faith or his worship, that the legitimate powers of government reach actions only, & not opinions, I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should "make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof", thus building a wall of separation between Church & State.


- Thomas Jefferson, 1802

Separation of Church and state doesn't exist? lol


Not from the Constitution. Again, No national religion and no law supressing free expression. You are never going to prevent ANY politician from having their religious beliefs interfere with their agenda while governing. I guess we're just going to disagree.



posted on Aug, 14 2011 @ 12:26 PM
link   
OP, I'm no fan of Bachman but I'm not a fan of a source that has their own agenda. The Huff Post. C'mon now, you take them as gospel?



posted on Aug, 14 2011 @ 12:27 PM
link   
reply to post by kozmo
 





Again, No national religion and no law supressing free expression.


How is this not separation of church and state?




You are never going to prevent ANY politician from having their religious beliefs interfere with their agenda while governing.


brb done with America.



posted on Aug, 14 2011 @ 12:27 PM
link   

Originally posted by kozmo

Originally posted by Stovokor
Why are small government conservatives like Bachmann more than willing to stick their government nose in our lives?




Good question and it illustrates the hypocrisy of most politicians. They want smaller government with less interference in our personal lives, but yet go out of their way to interfere in our personal lives. I've no problem with gay marriage. But right now the law states that marriage is between one man and one woman. I suspect her religious beliefs prevent her from seeing the light. That being said, there are certainly better ways for gays to fight for their cause without having to call such negative attention to themselves.


So all conservatives live in mobile homes?

Don't generalize.

Every gay person I know is not a gay activist..have no 'gay agenda'...we are normal people that go to work, pay our taxes, don't live in gay bars or do the whole pride scene..I cant care any less what people do in their bedrooms as long as all parties are consenting adults and bring no harm to anyone else.

I'm sitting here watching Meet the press right now and Bachmann is flip flopping on everything she has ever said regarding gays..and she is dodging every question..she sounds really dumb and hateful.



posted on Aug, 14 2011 @ 12:28 PM
link   

Originally posted by Mavros
OP, I'm no fan of Bachman but I'm not a fan of a source that has their own agenda. The Huff Post. C'mon now, you take them as gospel?


I don't have a issue with the Huff post. I've said this a million times. I thought they were good. Not to mention I got the link on reddit.



posted on Aug, 14 2011 @ 12:31 PM
link   
reply to post by Stovokor
 





she sounds really dumb and hateful.


Spoiler: She is.



posted on Aug, 14 2011 @ 12:31 PM
link   

Originally posted by kozmo

Originally posted by drew1749
reply to post by kozmo
 





Now I'll address your post. She came, spoke and left. I'm not suprised that liberal blog trash site would call it "Fleeing". She doesn't condone a gay lifestyle... so what? Deal with it.


No she was heckled then left without addressing the heckler. Who was a teenage kid.

How is it a liberal blog trash site? Did you investigate every article or is that just your opinion because it doesn't like Miss crazy?


Oh, I see... she is crazy because she didn't address a heckler. Got it!




Where did he say she was crazy? Do you have reading comprehension problems?

Her reaction was irresponsible and cowardly.



posted on Aug, 14 2011 @ 12:34 PM
link   
post removed because the user has no concept of manners

Click here for more information.



posted on Aug, 14 2011 @ 12:35 PM
link   

Originally posted by drew1749
reply to post by Stovokor
 





she sounds really dumb and hateful.


Spoiler: She is.


See, I think she is crazy as a fox but not stupid at all. I think it's a mistake for anyone to underestimate her intelligence. I said she sounds dumb, I don't honk she is dumb..hateful..yes.



posted on Aug, 14 2011 @ 12:36 PM
link   
reply to post by Mavros
 


I'm a T(fool)? What is that?

No I think the Huffington post is a source like any others. As good as inside edition (if you want to go with tabloids) or NBC. It's a good source.

I linked a article I thought ATS would care about that I found on Reddit. I've said this before. What's the issue?



posted on Aug, 14 2011 @ 12:37 PM
link   
I think the issue needs to be settled
in the supreme court..

This state by state is stupid!

It is like having a drivers license in one
state and not being able to drive in another
without getting a license from them...

I think their should be a NATIONAL
vote on this just like we vote for president.
Then let the supreme court uphold it or
void it..

I'm tired of this back and forth PC bull crap..

It does not matter if I am for or against.

Neither let them get married... OR DON'T!



posted on Aug, 14 2011 @ 12:40 PM
link   
reply to post by drew1749
 


The rights of a minority group should not be decided by the majority.



posted on Aug, 14 2011 @ 12:43 PM
link   
post removed because the user has no concept of manners

Click here for more information.



posted on Aug, 14 2011 @ 12:44 PM
link   

Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
reply to post by neo96
 





some posters arent doing womens rights any service



Exactly, where are the threads trashing Romney's religion, or Rick Santorum. He's Catholic. Yet all we see are the haters of female GOP candidates.


Fixed your post to reflect the reality of the U.S. If anyone bashes a DNC female, it's a sexist action. And also it is totally accepted to be racist against conservative blacks, but even disagree with Obama's agenda and you are classified a racist.



posted on Aug, 14 2011 @ 12:45 PM
link   

Originally posted by Mavros
OP, I'm no fan of Bachman but I'm not a fan of a source that has their own agenda. The Huff Post. C'mon now, you take them as gospel?


Iff the HufPo is not good enough, try the DeMoine Register:

caucuses.desmoinesregister.com...



posted on Aug, 14 2011 @ 12:50 PM
link   

Originally posted by Ferris.Bueller.II

Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
reply to post by neo96
 





some posters arent doing womens rights any service



Exactly, where are the threads trashing Romney's religion, or Rick Santorum. He's Catholic. Yet all we see are the haters of female GOP candidates.


Fixed your post to reflect the reality of the U.S. If anyone bashes a DNC female, it's a sexist action. And also it is totally accepted to be racist against conservative blacks, but even disagree with Obama's agenda and you are classified a racist.


Wait are people really trying to have it out against religion here? This isn't an attack on Miss Bachmann's religion. It's an attack on her credibility and emotional stability.



posted on Aug, 14 2011 @ 12:56 PM
link   

Originally posted by Stovokor
reply to post by drew1749
 


The rights of a minority group should not be decided by the majority.


Majority or Minority.....no group should have special rights.



new topics

top topics



 
50
<< 5  6  7    9  10  11 >>

log in

join