Australia will become the focal point for WW3, page 1


Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 7 times
Topic started on 13-8-2011 @ 09:41 AM by kro32

Australia's Antarctic claim 'at risk'



SYDNEY — Australia holds the largest claim to Antarctica but risks losing it in any race to unlock the frozen continent's potentially vast mineral and energy resources, an influential thinktank said Monday.


With global interest in the icy southern region growing, the Lowy Institute has warned Canberra against complacency when it comes to its claim, which covers 42 percent of Antarctica, an area roughly three-quarters the size of Australia.


www.google.com...


Fighting for the control of the worlds resources is a high probability as they become more scarce and with Australia holding such a large claim it may be very likely that they will be forced to defend it drawing in Australia's allies to a conflict that could easily spiral into a global conflict.

We've already seen forces such as those of Russia preparing for Antarctic operations. I believe this will more than likely be the stike point for a possible global confrontation.


reply posted on 15-8-2011 @ 04:08 PM by OzWeatherman
reply to post by idonotcollectstamps



Unarmed civilians means nothing.

We had unarmed civilians in WW2 when we got attacked, and we never had any enemy troops set foot on shore. You guys are simply ignorant...or maybe you're just too stupid. We have an army for a reason



reply posted on 15-8-2011 @ 04:21 PM by bluemirage5
reply to post by kro32



Actually, it's both Australia and NZ's claim at risk down there.

Personally, I don't want the Russians, Americans, Brits, Norwegian or any other nation in the Antartica at all. Leave it prestine and natural.


reply posted on 15-8-2011 @ 07:22 PM by steveknows
Originally posted by idonotcollectstamps
[SNIP]


No metal detectors in our schools fella. We put fuel in our cars at service stations "and then go and pay for it" not the other way around. If we get pulled over by a cop we can actually get out of the car and approach the cop without the risk of getting shot even though they do carry guns. And, wait for it, the vast majority of us hold a passport unlike the 86 percents of the U.S,( I'm assuming you're a Yank going on the Freedom, Liberties, Guns,guns,guns thing you're doing there), which doesn't have a passport so we're are usually in a position to compare our country to others if we so choose unlike being told, not asked, but told by Yanks that we call soccer football which we happen to call it soccer by the way. And being told by Yanks that we're Brittish, that's always cracked me up as I don't understand how people born within an inependant country within the commonwealth and on one of the world continents in the South Pacific, which in case you didn't know is on the other side of the world from Britain, and has its own money being decimal currency not Euro or pound and has Australian passports can be called Brittish.I hope you get my drift. What I'm trying to say cowboy is that statistically the average Yank doesn't know a great lot about the outside world.

Cowards you say? wasn't there an episode in Korea where Aussies were shootng at the chinese in one direction and shooting at the Yanks in the other who were running away from a battle? Yep I'm sure there was. You might not have heard about it as I don't think Hollywood made a movie about that one.
edit on 15-8-2011 by steveknows because: (no reason given)
edit on 17-8-2011 by Gemwolf because: Removed quoted post



reply posted on 15-8-2011 @ 11:36 PM by steveknows
Originally posted by kro32

Australia's Antarctic claim 'at risk'



SYDNEY — Australia holds the largest claim to Antarctica but risks losing it in any race to unlock the frozen continent's potentially vast mineral and energy resources, an influential thinktank said Monday.


With global interest in the icy southern region growing, the Lowy Institute has warned Canberra against complacency when it comes to its claim, which covers 42 percent of Antarctica, an area roughly three-quarters the size of Australia.


www.google.com...


Fighting for the control of the worlds resources is a high probability as they become more scarce and with Australia holding such a large claim it may be very likely that they will be forced to defend it drawing in Australia's allies to a conflict that could easily spiral into a global conflict.

We've already seen forces such as those of Russia preparing for Antarctic operations. I believe this will more than likely be the stike point for a possible global confrontation.


This very scenario was predicted by a BBC think tank in the 80's I remember watching a documentary about what is likely to happen in the future. The scenario went something like this. The UK and Europe team up ( and this was before the Euro) China, india and some other asian countries ally themselves. Canada, U.S and Australia and japan ally themselves. It's a rescource starved world and the Antarctic is the only place left untouched. Canada, Australia and the U.S played it smart earlier on and sat on their fossil fuels for the most part, which we have been doing, and used up what the middle east had to offer.

China starts serveying the Antarctic and claims they're there for scientific research of the environment, must have learned that one from the Japs, Australia gets wind of mining and send warships and troops to garrison what it has in Antarctic and also sends warships to "visit" the U.S bases drop in and say hello how ya goin and basically present a presence to back up the U.S while the U.S dispatches a carrier fleet and troops to the region and Canada dispatches ships and troops as well. Then it's a stand off and a very real chance of a global war. I can't remember the whole thing but it's really a case if Britain and Europe having a sook and saying fairs fair and why dont you give us some and China and India accusing U.S, Canada and Australia of being greedy westerners.

I guess the youngest children on the planet just knew enough to think ahead haha.

edit on 15-8-2011 by steveknows because: (no reason given)
edit on 15-8-2011 by steveknows because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 17-8-2011 @ 03:04 AM by Petrov62
reply to post by idonotcollectstamps



As an Australian I can only say the following... no,I do not own semi-automatic assault weapons such as you yanks can own, but I do own a couple of old fashioned bolt action rifles that would with ease produce a kill shot at out to 600mtrs, no assault rifle that I know of will do that.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^



Ahmadinejad speaking at the UN - Is he going to declare war?
  Posted 1 days ago with 21 member flags
Turkey says it is prepared for possibility of war with Israel
  Posted 10 days ago with 15 member flags
IDF general: Likelihood of regional war growing
  Posted 18 days ago with 14 member flags
Full-scale Middle East war is \'imminent\', warns Israeli general
  Posted 17 days ago with 10 member flags
Netanyahu: Palestinian Statehood Bid \'Doomed\'
  Posted 4 days ago with 9 member flags
US Boots on the Ground in Libya, Pentagon Confirms
  Posted 11 days ago with 8 member flags