Is this for real? Russian news channel spills the beans about the existence of Nibiru and 2012?, page 33


Pages: <<  30    31    32    33    34    35    36  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 129 times


reply posted on 16-8-2011 @ 07:21 AM by LightAssassin
reply to post by smash_the_system



EDIT: I have read the pdf and it is far more detailed than the Scribd version, same thesis though.

Yes, it's been 'debunked' to death.

Saturn doing 90s is due to the 'mirror effect' of looking through a telescope assuming the guy hasn't already allowed for this..

Supposedly an object the size/mass of 'Nibiru' would have 'perturbed' planets from their orbit assuming this behaves the way a normal planetary object does.

Also, with all the astrnomers looking at the sky around the world....someone that can and would say something surely would have by now assuming it can be seen.

I would like to see recent photo's of CW Leonis though.
edit on 16-8-2011 by LightAssassin because: (no reason given)
edit on 16-8-2011 by LightAssassin because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 16-8-2011 @ 08:03 AM by autowrench
reply to post by LightAssassin




Yes, it's been 'debunked' to death.



Yes, it has. And in my considered opinion, it will be debunked to death right up until it stands in the sky for all to see. For some, until that day, it simply will not exist in their minds. This is the way of many things closed minds cannot, and will not see.


reply posted on 16-8-2011 @ 08:08 AM by Xcalibur254
reply to post by autowrench



Just because you believe an alternative theory doesn't mean you are open minded. We have provided you countless facts that say Nibiru is non-existent but you keep ignoring these things and continue spouting things that are demonstrably false. That is essentially the definition of close minded right there.


reply posted on 16-8-2011 @ 08:11 AM by DJW001
reply to post by smash_the_system



Can anyone clarify authenticity?


Yes,it is an authentically flawed work written by a fifteen year old who is weak in math and science.


reply posted on 16-8-2011 @ 08:14 AM by XplanetX
Originally posted by Xcalibur254
reply to
post by autowrench



Just because you believe an alternative theory doesn't mean you are open minded. We have provided you countless facts that say Nibiru is non-existent but you keep ignoring these things and continue spouting things that are demonstrably false. That is essentially the definition of close minded right there.



'We?'

You make it sound like you have special authority on this matter. Do you sit around a table with other debunkers making plans to specifically put all of your time and effort into particular threads?
Just curious, maybe the trolls roam in packs now?


reply posted on 16-8-2011 @ 11:16 AM by DJW001
reply to post by XplanetX



You make it sound like you have special authority on this matter. Do you sit around a table with other debunkers making plans to specifically put all of your time and effort into particular threads?
Just curious, maybe the trolls roam in packs now?


That is quite literally what Terral Croft does... and when someone challenges his authority, he throws a hissy fit. Just sayin'.


reply posted on 16-8-2011 @ 12:04 PM by Harte
Originally posted by XplanetX
Originally posted by Xcalibur254
reply to
post by autowrench



Just because you believe an alternative theory doesn't mean you are open minded. We have provided you countless facts that say Nibiru is non-existent but you keep ignoring these things and continue spouting things that are demonstrably false. That is essentially the definition of close minded right there.



'We?'

You make it sound like you have special authority on this matter. Do you sit around a table with other debunkers making plans to specifically put all of your time and effort into particular threads?
Just curious, maybe the trolls roam in packs now?


If you have real information to the contrary, I suggest you present that rather than nitpicking over the use of whatever pronoun in a sentence.

You don't?

I thought not.

Harte



reply posted on 16-8-2011 @ 03:39 PM by Afterthought
I found this picture just now and found it to be quite interesting.
It's a photo of the mural in the Virginia Air and Space Center
It's called "Solar System" and was painted by Sam Welty
www.angelfire.com...

The part that caught my attention is that it shows a comet approaching the sun and seemingly causing a solar flare. You can see Earth in the distance and the curvature of the coma makes it seem as though it's heading towards our planet.

What does everyone else think about this? Does anyone notice anything else about the mural that we should take note of?


reply posted on 16-8-2011 @ 04:38 PM by Soylent Green Is People
reply to post by Afterthought



First of all, how do you know it was the artist's intention that the comet was causing the solar flare? There is an additional flare above that one that is nowhere near the comet. If an artist were to depict a detailed image of the Sun, I suspect he would probably show the Sun with a flare, whether he also showed a comet or not.

Secondly, I don't see anything out of the ordinary with this painting. It certainly depicts the information known to the average person about the solar system and space in general -- I see stars, nebulae (or perhaps it's the milky way), planets, moons, asteroids, the Sun with some flares (which are perfectly normal and common), and a comet.


edit on 8/16/2011 by Soylent Green Is People because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 16-8-2011 @ 04:56 PM by mikeybiznaz
reply to post by Hydroman



I am no rocket scientist. It is my opinion these bodies don't influence other planets because they are not on the same rotation plane as the planets in our solar system. So when they near miss earth they are closest to only earth to be an influence or be influenced by.....I could be wrong but this is my take on it
edit on 16-8-2011 by mikeybiznaz because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 16-8-2011 @ 05:04 PM by Afterthought
reply to post by Soylent Green Is People



I appreciate your reply. I wasn't saying that it was the artist's intention to make it seem as though the comet was causing the flare, but it did cross my mind. I thought it was interesting the way he painted the comet so close to the sun in the first place. Although it did seem odd to me that the flare is just above the comet. I also wanted to see if someone noticed anything else about the painting since I'm not that keen about planets and how they should look (ie. storms, colors, positions, etc.)

Thanks for taking the time to check it out and reply back.
edit on 16-8-2011 by Afterthought because: (no reason given)

Pages: <<  30    31    32    33    34    35    36  >>    ^^TOP^^



Pane andov - expected cosmic events in 2012-2013
  Posted 8 days ago with 9 member flags
Near Earth Asteroid Sept 14 2012
  Posted 6 days ago with 8 member flags
Let\'s take a look at the PoleShift/PlanetX doomsayers, shall we?
  Posted 19 days ago with 7 member flags
2012 Is not the End.
  Posted 3 days ago with 4 member flags