It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by mnemeth1
Any law, from any period of time, in any country, for any particular problem.
For example, state the following:
"Law ______ has solved the problem of _______ ; therefore, that problem no longer exists."
Laws that repeal old laws don't count.
Originally posted by kro32
District of Columbia vs. Heller
The District of Columbia said people could not own firearms and the case went to the Supreme Court who said that actually people could own firearms.
This law solved the problem of not allowing firearms which is guaranteed under the second amendment.
Any other questions?
Originally posted by Rockdisjoint
Law of gravity has solved the problem of people flying; therefore, that problem no longer exists.
Originally posted by kro32
reply to post by kn0wh0w
How the hell can your challenge still stand when I answered it with a correct law. Just because I blew up your thread in the first five minutes is no reason to change the rules.
Originally posted by kro32
District of Columbia vs. Heller
The District of Columbia said people could not own firearms and the case went to the Supreme Court who said that actually people could own firearms.
This law solved the problem of not allowing firearms which is guaranteed under the second amendment.
Any other questions?
Originally posted by mnemeth1
Any law, from any period of time, in any country, for any particular problem.
For example, state the following:
"Law ______ has solved the problem of _______ ; therefore, that problem no longer exists."
Laws that repeal old laws don't count.
Originally posted by davidchin
Well, in Texas, they passed a law that puts a maximum limit to how much can be awarded on non-economic damages. That seemed to help reduce frivolous medical malpractice lawsuits.
The law to allow for the concealed carry of handguns in Texas seems to have reduced the number of crimes involving firearms.
Also, in Texas, the death penalty, when performed seems to correlate with a temporary drop in capital crimes.
Originally posted by kn0wh0w
Originally posted by kro32
District of Columbia vs. Heller
The District of Columbia said people could not own firearms and the case went to the Supreme Court who said that actually people could own firearms.
This law solved the problem of not allowing firearms which is guaranteed under the second amendment.
Any other questions?
yeah 1.
so you're assuming that everyone see 'not having the right to own a firearm' as a problem?
nice generalisation
challenge still stands imo
Originally posted by kro32
reply to post by kn0wh0w
How the hell can your challenge still stand when I answered it with a correct law. Just because I blew up your thread in the first five minutes is no reason to change the rules.
Originally posted by daggyz
Laws were not meant to 'solve' a problem, they were produced to protect a people form those who would do others harm.
But I will name one.
The death penalty solves a problem. If we have a recidivist killer, he dies... end of problem.
Originally posted by kro32
reply to post by mnemeth1
It didn't repeal any laws in fact it set the precedent. The second amendment was the last amendment that had not been applied to States yet and this case did that.
This issue had never come before the Supreme Court and as such they had to establish the law.
you lose
Specific law, specific problem solved
Originally posted by gimme_some_truth
Originally posted by kn0wh0w
Originally posted by kro32
District of Columbia vs. Heller
The District of Columbia said people could not own firearms and the case went to the Supreme Court who said that actually people could own firearms.
This law solved the problem of not allowing firearms which is guaranteed under the second amendment.
Any other questions?
yeah 1.
so you're assuming that everyone see 'not having the right to own a firearm' as a problem?
nice generalisation
challenge still stands imo
Challenge does not stand....The problem was that our second amendment right was being violated.... This law,fixed that problem.