It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by soficrow
On one level, "Small is beautiful" means that keeping things small (corporations, governments, institutions, systems), prevents power from being consolidated in one place, and fewer bad things can happen.
Originally posted by mc_squared
reply to post by unityemissions
Yeah for sure - I don't think it's even a question of bigger or smaller - it's really a matter of smarter, more responsible, honest, accountable, etc.
The problem with that is, in a democratic state - it requires the voting public to demonstrate the SAME qualities in order to vote the right people in ...and...well, ugggh... good luck!
Sometimes I think we seriously need a system where you have to pass an IQ test to get a vote.
It doesn't have to be super-hard, just something that shows an ability to think critically and independently - and not merely react to low level emotions like fear, or mindlessly regurgitate whatever the talking heads want you to think.
Some people might say this is horribly elitist and unequal - but really is it any different than the so-called "free" society we live in today?
The way things work now it's the ones with the most money who determine politics, through campaign contributions, advertising, ownership of the media, etc.
Maybe we need to find a way to steer this imbalance into the hands of the people smart enough to at least see through all that bull#
Originally posted by poet1b
If you had any knowledge of the U.S. economy you would know when I say that the rest of the world is more hostile to corporations than the U.S., you would know this to be true.
The U.S. has lower regulations and lower taxes for corporations than any first world nation. While ICs manufacture in third world countries, their political systems are too unstable for any more investment than they currently make, and their productivity is actually decreasing.
Originally posted by poet1b
Eliminate the income tax and replace it with a tax that charges business activities for federal oversight, that allows them to conduct business in the U.S.. The national debt and associated interest payments will be paid for exclusively by businesses that conduct international and interstate business.
Drug companies and food companies would pay for the FDA, when the goods they produced cross state and national borders, as they should. If we are going to have any drug laws, and laws that control food, then the companies who conduct commerce in these areas should pay the cost of regulation. Companies that engage in industries that use or produce large amounts of toxic poisons, all of which inevitably, at least potentially, cross state borders, they will pay for the EPA. Law firms will pay for the judiciary, and so forth.
There will be a federal agency created to combat fraud, and it will be paid for by the finance industry.
All U.S. military operations overseas will be paid for by taxes levied on imports and exports.
Originally posted by poet1b
The corporations didn't flee back in the fifties and the sixties when corporate taxes were much higher, and our economy was much stronger then. They won't flee now. The only people making such a claim are propagandists spreading lies, and those people who believe those lies.
Your statement of the rest of the world being much more hostile to corporations in nonsense though. If you believe this, tell me why you believe it to be true. I doubt you can.
Wealth is created by two human resources, labor and ideas, and the U.S. produces far more of these human resources than any other country. The ICs don't create the wealth, the people create the wealth, which is why ICs love to invest in the U.S., and why ICs will never leave the U.S..
Originally posted by poet1b
The U.S. was an economic powerhouse long before WW II, we emerged as the dominant military power after WW II, but we were more deeply in debt than we ever have been as a nation, yet we paid for the rebuilding of our former enemies, engaged in two wars, plus a cold war, built up our nations infrastructure, and reduced the national debt down to low levels, all with high taxes on corporations and the super rich. It worked then, and it will work now.
The ICs didn't leave then, and they won't leave now, because the productivity of the U.S. public is what makes them rich. The real fact is that the giant corporations are nothing but giant leeches.
Originally posted by poet1b
By the way, the economy of Canada is minuscule compared to the U.S.. The ICs aren't about to abandon the U.S. for Canada. And, they need the U.S. military to keep their overseas operations going. You are completely out to lunch with these claims.
Originally posted by poet1b
Once you stop worshiping at the corporate altar, you will realize what leeches they are.
Backpedal all you will by posting some nonsense about ideas and labor.
Please explain to me how the US military ensures the thriving of home soil headquarted US corporations. Im assuming by making this statement, you are stating your willingness to continue Americans overseas imperialism in order to ensure the continued growth of your corporations. If not, i guess you can scratch your "they need the U.S. military to keep their overseas operations going".
I challenge you to show me how the USA is still the best option...
Originally posted by poet1b
While you see corporations are having problems, you still think corporations are the end all, creators of everything.
Originally posted by poet1b
A giant IC based in Canada will still continue to do most of its business in the U.S. because the U.S. economy is so much bigger. It doesn't matter where the headquarters is based, they will still be taxed for their business operations in the U.S.. Maybe China and India will become like the U.S. in the future, but that will be in the distant future. Both are most likely heading in the direction of Japan.
Originally posted by poet1b
Our biggest differences is that you seem to be absolutely convinced that the U.S. needs corporations, when it does not. If anything, corporations get in the way of U.S.productivity.
Originally posted by poet1b
Just the opposite, I want to kick out the corporations and stop backing their overseas corporate imperialism. This has been one of my biggest points from the beginning. Why the corporations should pay U.S. debt, because the money was spent promoting their overseas imperialism. They will pay the money in order to continue doing business in the U.S., and in hopes of regaining control of the U.S., should they loose control once again.
Originally posted by poet1b
Just the opposite, I want to kick out the corporations and stop backing their overseas corporate imperialism.
While corporations are moving out of the U.S., they are still planning on selling in the U.S.., that is when we hit them with the taxes.
Your as transparent as Dick Cheney.
While 68.3 million Americans struggle to get enough food to eat and wages are declining for 90 percent of the population, ...US millionaire households now have $38.6 trillion in wealth. On top of the $38.6 trillion this study reveals, they have an estimated $6.3 trillion hidden in offshore accounts.
In total, US millionaire households have at least $45.9 trillion in wealth, the majority of this wealth is held within the upper one-tenth of one percent of the population.