Hollywood shows its Anti-American Agenda, Media fans the flames, page 1
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 2 times
Topic started on 12-8-2011 @ 09:57 AM by lonewolf19792000
This is tantamount to telling terrorists/criminals its ok and fun to kidnap innocent people and strap bombs to their chests. Hollywood shows its true anti-american colors with the movie "30 minutes or less". This movie is about a pizza delivery guy who gets kidnapped and has a bomb strapped to his chest and forced to rob a bank.

Hollywood is clearly sending a message to criminals and terrorist cells that its ok to kidnap americans and strap bombs to their chests, because Hollywood will then turn it into a movie to make money off of. Unbeknownst to many americans, this is actually a real case from 2003 where a man did have a collar bomb put around his neck and was subsequently killed.

www.msnbc.msn.com...

Some may believe that the man was in on the robbery, however logic dictates it cannot be so. Allegedly his girlfriend put the bomb on him, if he was in on it why would she kill him? To keep from getting caught perhaps? Not feasible when forensics labs can track down the matierals used to make these collar bombs and found out who bought the materials.

There was also a girl in Australian who was kidnapped and forced to wear a collar bomb. These terrorists and criminals get their ideas from Hollywood and the media.

abcnews.go.com...

Is Hollywood and the Media on a crusade to support terrorism? They must be, they flaunt these events all over the world so terrorists and criminals can grandstand in the spotlight and soak up the spotlight.
edit on 12-8-2011 by lonewolf19792000 because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 12-8-2011 @ 10:21 AM by Austin316
reply to post by kro32



Ahhhh, just as voting on an amendment to a bill to improve it does not set precedence for hating children, right? Odd how your tune changes from thread to thread.

However, I do agree that I don't think there is an ulterior motive with this movie. Bombs are bombs are bombs in Hollywood. I also agree with the OP that it is sad if they are reaping the full benefits of this story. I'd like to do some research and see if any of the profits go to his family..


reply posted on 12-8-2011 @ 10:32 AM by Ittabena
reply to post by lonewolf19792000



Twenty years ago the Major Media was in the hands of about 100 owners. Last year this number was 5. This year it is 6. Yay, things have greatly improve!

Thomas Jefferson warned us, but we didn't listen. Bobby Kennedy took on the monopolies - last guy to do so - that should have been a big wake up call. Hey, is it time for Dancing With The Stars yet?

I am just sayin...


reply posted on 12-8-2011 @ 10:35 AM by Malcher
Originally posted by Ittabena
reply to
post by lonewolf19792000



Twenty years ago the Major Media was in the hands of about 100 owners. Last year this number was 5. This year it is 6. Yay, things have greatly improve!

Thomas Jefferson warned us, but we didn't listen. Bobby Kennedy took on the monopolies - last guy to do so - that should have been a big wake up call. Hey, is it time for Dancing With The Stars yet?

I am just sayin...


Actually there are far more independent film makers now than 20 years ago.


reply posted on 12-8-2011 @ 10:42 AM by beezzer
reply to post by lonewolf19792000

As much as I despise the leftist culture of Hollywood and the moronic drooling masses that it produces, there is that pesky freedom of speech. So let them produce their trash. T'is of no concern if you don't indulge.

edit on 12-8-2011 by beezzer because: (no reason given)

Pages:     ^^TOP^^



Have You Seen the Attention-Grabbing New TIME Cover?
  Posted 18 days ago with 31 member flags
"I AM" the documentary in full on Youtube
  Posted 19 days ago with 11 member flags
The one topic even TED won\'t touch: Income Inequality
  Posted 12 days ago with 10 member flags
Denying Ignorance about Copyright
  Posted 12 days ago with 9 member flags
Dan Rather Slams Corporate Media
  Posted 8 days ago with 9 member flags