It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by haarvik
reply to post by Res Ipsa
How about supporting him now? How about spreading the word? If you truly wish him to be president, then start now...don't wait for some primary. If we don't get his name and message out now, it will be too late in the primaries!
....That's stupid. You're saying that if they develop nukes, they might attack us with them.
When a nuke goes off in Israel , how long before a nuke goes off in New York City?
You should watch a movie called The Peacemaker.
It can fit in a backpack.
Originally posted by getreadyalready
reply to post by Eurisko2012
There are no backback / suitcase nukes. That was a Russian rumor during the cold war, there might have been 1 or 2 prototypes, but they weren't successful, and they also weren't powerful.
A "dirty bomb" is the scare tactic of today, but they only damage a few square blocks, and then poison the area for awhile. (Still a pretty bad scenario). BUT, dirty bombs are so easily detectable, there is no way one could get into the country without some help from the government. If we are ever the victim of a dirty bomb and/or nuke, you can rest assured our own government is to blame!
Right now the whole country is handing over their liberties without a fight, at the behest of the MSM, FEMA, DHS, and other government entities. All the "terror" is coming in imaginary form from those outlets. The terror is ongoing, but it isn't foreign made, it is made right here in our own television studios!
Small, two-man portable, or truck-portable, tactical weapons (sometimes misleadingly referred to as suitcase nukes),
Originally posted by Section31
MSNBC, NBC, CBS, CNN, and ABC are all liberal leaning news networks. As a matter of fact, MSNBC's new slogan is "Leaning Forward", which mean 'progressive' liberalism. No, I will not can that garbage.
Originally posted by TheWalkingFox
CNN and MSNBC were ranting about Perry. I haven't seen a conservative network give their two cents.
Originally posted by Fromabove
Bachmann was a winner because she could at least show she was consistent in what she believed and did as a congressional representative.
Cain was a winner because he could show a knowledge of economics, something badly needed in a leader today.
Paul shows the need for a strong homeland defense without saving the entire worlds problems. Start here first is the way to go.
Romney failed to prove his case but did no harm to himself.
Gingrich was at least feisty and combative but showed a knowledge of how government works stating some past achievements.
Pawlenty seemed like a punk.
Huntsman was too liberal and got caught being so.
I was disappointed that Pawlenty beat up on the one candidate most like him. Santorum also beat up on Bachmann and she was mad as a hornet, and she showed it too much. I'm certain people saw that as weakness. Paul is the only one who seems to get the whole Fed Reserve thing.
I can't remember the others names.
Originally posted by Eurisko2012
Oh, well that's relief. Wait! What in the world is this???
- Tactical Nuclear Bomb -
It's rumored the old Soviet union sold a few of these on the black market for
$200 million each to Al Qaeda.
Yield = 100 Kilotons
That's 5 times Hiroshima.
Small enough to fit inside a standard refrigerator.
- Soviet Tactical Nuke at bottom of the Page -