It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by bogomil
reply to post by XplanetX
You wrote:
["And you have your own self proclaimed authority that says the opposite, it is one opinion against another. Your throw away line is tiresome and hypocritical."]
Nope, it's one set of applied reasoning-method against another set of applied reasoning-method.
In my version of a reasoning-method saying NO to self-proclaimed authority doesn't make me an authority. Just as if I say NO to manifested idological fascism (e.g. nazism or the ideology behind the inquisition) doesn't make me a fascist.
This direction of semantic quibblings are however beyond the scope of this thread, and on my part the EXTENT into that blind alley ends here.
edit on 13-8-2011 by bogomil because: syntax
Originally posted by XplanetX
Originally posted by bogomil
reply to post by XplanetX
You wrote:
["And you have your own self proclaimed authority that says the opposite, it is one opinion against another. Your throw away line is tiresome and hypocritical."]
Nope, it's one set of applied reasoning-method against another set of applied reasoning-method.
In my version of a reasoning-method saying NO to self-proclaimed authority doesn't make me an authority. Just as if I say NO to manifested idological fascism (e.g. nazism or the ideology behind the inquisition) doesn't make me a fascist.
This direction of semantic quibblings are however beyond the scope of this thread, and on my part the EXTENT into that blind alley ends here.
edit on 13-8-2011 by bogomil because: syntax
You are your own authority and you have your own opinion.
I am likewise the same, I just believe that someone else (Jesus) has greater authority than me.
You are right about one thing, the blind alley.
Originally posted by bogomil
Originally posted by XplanetX
Originally posted by bogomil
reply to post by XplanetX
You wrote:
["And you have your own self proclaimed authority that says the opposite, it is one opinion against another. Your throw away line is tiresome and hypocritical."]
Nope, it's one set of applied reasoning-method against another set of applied reasoning-method.
In my version of a reasoning-method saying NO to self-proclaimed authority doesn't make me an authority. Just as if I say NO to manifested idological fascism (e.g. nazism or the ideology behind the inquisition) doesn't make me a fascist.
This direction of semantic quibblings are however beyond the scope of this thread, and on my part the EXTENT into that blind alley ends here.
edit on 13-8-2011 by bogomil because: syntax
You are your own authority and you have your own opinion.
I am likewise the same, I just believe that someone else (Jesus) has greater authority than me.
You are right about one thing, the blind alley.
Take all this to a forum on philosophy, where it belongs.
Originally posted by bogomil
Not everyone evaluates the overall situation exclusively based on the premises of a circle-argumented mythological manual with self-proclaimed authority.
Is this so hard to understand?
Originally posted by DISRAELI
Originally posted by bogomil
Not everyone evaluates the overall situation exclusively based on the premises of a circle-argumented mythological manual with self-proclaimed authority.
Is this so hard to understand?
But this is the Theology forum, designed for that very purpose.
Is that so hard to understand?
Originally posted by bogomil
Each thread is limited by the perimeters of the topic. It's not a general invitation for preaching widely outside that.
Originally posted by DISRAELI
Originally posted by bogomil
Each thread is limited by the perimeters of the topic. It's not a general invitation for preaching widely outside that.
I was discussing the identity of the Mark of the Beast mentioned in Revelation, which is the topic of this thread.
Criticising Bible-based talk for being Bible-based talk, on the other hand, is outside the parameters of the topic.
For everyone claiming God wouldn't trick us.. i say, YOU would trick you. Not God.
Originally posted by skydog801
reply to post by rwfresh
you are allowed to think want you will, but its incorrect! I'm directly connected to God. people are making their choices as to where they stand. dispite what you propose.
Originally posted by lonewolf19792000
reply to post by rwfresh
The one hole in your theory is this, the mark has to be ACCEPTED. All the marks youre talking about, facial marks, thumb prints iris scans (eye scan) etc. youre born with. The mark of the beast must be a choice made of free will, that you accept it. So it is something given, an object maybe,barcode tatoo, sub dermal microship. Something that prevents you from buying or selling if you do not have it.
California has already required animal owners to "tag" their pets with microships. The way things go is we start with animals first to see if its safe (reference to the space program, using animals and seeing if they came back dead and adjusted accordingly).
It's not going to be thumbprint, facial prints/scan or ocular scans. Faiths believe it is going to be in your mind or in your heart, a choice given and a choice being made. Perhaps it could be the literal heart or brain itself, some sort of chip.
Ultimately youre never going to know until that moment comes when "they" come after you. No point scaring yourselves to death in the mean time.