It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by cnm1976
reply to post by CLPrime
Does this mean they could plant trees in the hope the grow? I know you need water but given they have found water near the suface of late this could be an option.
Differing values have been reported for the average temperature on Mars,[15] with a common value being −55 °C (−67 °F).[16] Surface temperatures have been estimated from the Viking Orbiter Infrared Thermal Mapper data; this gives extremes from a warmest of 27 °C (81 °F) to −143 °C (−225 °F) at the winter polar caps.[17] Actual temperature measurements from the Viking landers range from −17.2 °C (1.0 °F) to −107 °C (−161 °F). It has been reported that "On the basis of the nighttime air temperature data, every northern spring and early northern summer yet observed were identical to within the level of experimental error (to within ±1 K)" but that the "daytime data, however, suggest a somewhat different story, with temperatures varying from year-to-year by up to 6 K in this season.[18] This day-night discrepancy is unexpected and not understood". In southern spring and summer variance is dominated by dust storms, which increase the value of the night low temperature and decrease the daytime peak temperature,[19] resulting in a small (20C) decrease in average surface temperature, and a moderate (30C) increase in upper atmosphere temperature.[20]
No need for image alteration, I have posted several images taken by the rovers with a bluish sky.
Originally posted by AutOmatIc
Amazing! So did NASA alter previous photos to reflect the general assumption that the Martian sky was red, if so, for what reason?
And if they didn't?
And if they altered previous photos...what else have they altered???
The natural gases in Earth's atmosphere are more or less colorless too (not counting smog), but it's primarily Rayleigh scattering that gives the Earth its blue sky due to the higher atmospheric density compared to Mars.
Originally posted by CLPrime
reply to post by AutOmatIc
The Martian atmosphere is actually predominantly carbon dioxide, which means it's mostly colourless.
Thanks for weighing in on this with your knowledgeable information, ArMaP! Nice work, as always!
Originally posted by ArMaP
Do you know why Mars photos look orange? Because of the dust in the air, you can see the same effect on the following photo, from Sidney.
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/a6af550c1112.jpg[/atsimg]
We know the color of the Martian daytime sky from properly color-balanced pictures taken by the Viking landers in 1976 and Mars Pathfinder in 1997. The first Viking lander images broadcast over TV in the 1970s showed a blue sky, later "corrected" to a pink sky. In addition to uncertainties in the initial image processing, the lander had several color patches to calibrate the cameras, which were partially covered with Martian dust thrown up during landing. However, further analysis of Viking lander data revealed a Martian sky that is generally butterscotch in color, except for the pink or red of sunset and sunrise. In 1997, the Mars Pathfinder confirmed this finding....
While Rayleigh scattering has a very small effect in the Martian atmosphere, at certain times and in certain places, clouds of extremely small dust particles give a blue cast to images taken from overhead. These are the so-called "blue hazes" observed in some cratered regions and parts of the Valles Marineris.
Originally posted by Arbitrageur
Originally posted by CLPrime
The Martian atmosphere is actually predominantly carbon dioxide, which means it's mostly colourless.
The natural gases in Earth's atmosphere are more or less colorless too (not counting smog), but it's primarily Rayleigh scattering that gives the Earth its blue sky due to the higher atmospheric density compared to Mars.
Sure, you can see it here.
Originally posted by Arbitrageur
I'm not sure exactly what I'm looking at in the Sydney photos. Is there a link to the source with a caption perhaps, to explain the photo on the right?