There Are Some MAJOR Discrepancies in the Orbit Projections of ELEnin, page 8
Pages: <<  5    6    7    8  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 40 times


reply posted on 12-8-2011 @ 03:44 PM by Illustronic
Originally posted by SatoriTheory
Originally posted by trueperspective
Phage, thanks for showing up. However, you didn't read it right. The first image is the Projection AS OF March. then I fastfowarded the animation to OCT 17, 2011.

The second image is the projection AS OF today. then i fastfowarded the animation to OCT 17, 2011.

The differnce between the two is 35 MILLION km. That is quit a margin of error no??!!?!


If, as I suspect, you got this 'stuff' from the
Elenin.org page, then the orbit viewer is broken, it is missing the Stereo A and Stereo B orbits, which is why double 'Earth - Sun' data is visible in the bottom left. Correct data can be found here Elenin + Stereo A +Stereo B

Sorry to be the party pooper and burst the 'doom seekers' bubble.

However, if you are seeking doom, I can point you in a new direction.

st.

EDIT: Here is an image comparing both webpage source code, you can see the problem, more so if you are familiar with webpage coding. If image is cut off, try opening in a new window.

edit on 12-8-2011 by SatoriTheory because: Adding Image.



Finally someone recognizes what I mean by source, the source the OP used, that was not on the JPL site proved by Phang's link from January!!

This is what Captianinstaban can't seem to get through his thick head, while calling me out for misunderstanding it's clear he doesn't read posts, or any info that is counter to his view he's obviously trolling. I intended to give him the benefit of doubt but it's clear now.

I follow things quite well thank you, it's you that did no homework. Aptly named as well. You expect unbiased responses with a board name like that? Constant posts of crap not even acknowledging the links?


reply posted on 12-8-2011 @ 09:55 PM by bigwig22
reply to post by Ghost375



In fact, a comet trajectory is pretty unpredictable due to the gas that can be expelled at anytime because of heat or something else.

When this happens, the trajectory may change.

Peace out.


reply posted on 13-8-2011 @ 05:58 AM by CaptainInstaban

Finally someone recognizes what I mean by source, the source the OP used, that was not on the JPL site proved by Phang's link from January!! This is what Captianinstaban can't seem to get through his thick head,
reply to
post by Illustronic



If I am the only one that didn´t get it, why are you saying that finally someone recognizes what you meant? I read your posts, maybe you should´ve been a bit more clear, I did ask you what source you were talking about, but you didn´t respond to that.



while calling me out for misunderstanding


In some posts you clrearly gave irrelevant information, with regards to what I was discussing in other posts I asked you to explain yourself, wich you didnt.



it's clear he doesn't read posts, or any info that is counter to his view he's obviously trolling.


What, as soon as I saw the undeniable evidence I admitted you guys wwre right, I already said that, I also apologised if I was a bit aggressive.

I can be a pain in the ass when I want to get to the bottom of things. I assure you that my motives are purely about finding the truth.

Do trolls admit to stuff, and apologise?



You expect unbiased responses with a board name like that? Constant posts of crap not even acknowledging the links?


Let´s just focus on the content of my posts, by links you mean those that Phage came up with? I admit I hadn´t understood what he was trying to say, initially, but it´s not like he spelled out what he meant exactly.

Besides, I was told by ATS Staff that I had contributed to the quality of the forums, a few days ago, so i´m sure it is not as bad as you suggest.

I guess you want some recognition for being right, well good job sport, but it wasn´t you who came up with the undeniable evidence.







edit on 13-8-2011 by CaptainInstaban because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 13-8-2011 @ 01:55 PM by shakyjoe35
You should worry more about this....what is associated with Elenin:

Eleven NEO's all lining up on Aug 15/16 2011! (Near Earth Objects)

I have looked at all the orbital diagrams on this JPL page:
neo.jpl.nasa.gov...
and have counted 11...yes 11, Near Earth Objects that will line up with Venus Sun Mercury major bodies line up on 15/16 August - on Monday to Tuesday next week!
This includes Comet 45P Honda.
Not all of them are near the Plane of the Ecliptic during this period....some are below, and some are above that flat disc of the Solar System.
But we know so little about the way this gravitational flux effect works fully - in creating massive earthquakes like the one in Japan recently.....so.....maybe these bodies don't need to be on the ecliptic to create a gravitational disturbance in the earth's crust....and so create a massive earthquake?
An awful lot of them that don't line up, and I discarded....are still very close to that line up, and so...maybe they may have an effect....who knows!?

These are the ones I feel come close to lining up with the other major bodies:

2011 NZ
ssd.jpl.nasa.gov...

2011 PF2
ssd.jpl.nasa.gov...

2011 OE
ssd.jpl.nasa.gov...

2011 OJ45
ssd.jpl.nasa.gov...

2007 VB138
ssd.jpl.nasa.gov...

2011 OC18
ssd.jpl.nasa.gov...

2009 OO9
ssd.jpl.nasa.gov...

2011 PT
ssd.jpl.nasa.gov...

2011 GD60
ssd.jpl.nasa.gov...

2008 SR7
ssd.jpl.nasa.gov...

45P/Honda-Mrkos-Pajdusakova
ssd.jpl.nasa.gov...




I think this is what the drawing is at the bottom of the Swiss bank note
www.redicecreations.com...
it shows the plane of the ecliptic as the horizontal line, and the ellipses represent the major bodies, (Although there is one too many ellipse for 15/16 Aug.....it could mean Nibiru is the extra body as the extra ellipse) and the the other angled lines, and triangular points represent the positions of the Asteroids above and below the plane of the ecliptic.
Someone on the internet thought the normal solar system diagram on the note represents the 26th of September.
When the three days of darkness begins.
www.godlikeproductions.com...

Just not very good news is it?
I advise folk to get into the country and stay in a tent before these dates.

Good luck.



reply posted on 13-8-2011 @ 02:05 PM by Illustronic
reply to post by CaptainInstaban



I was never trying to champion myself as the deal breaker. I examined the claims made from the source and went to the source to find out it was a total crackpot website. I noticed some artifacts of the images posted that were not present in any of the other JPL images. I really didn't follow the news of this insignificant comet back in January but did by March and never seen those kind of orbital projections claimed by that site so I was curious how they twisted the facts to dupe you.

I didn't blow the lid to the point Phang did because I WAS WORKING! The misinformation was not as urgent as making money to me I just wanted to point out I saw something disingenuous or at worst, purposely misleading. Color me a subordinate if you must to feel better.

I never bought the OP statement so I have that going for me, even while browsing while working.
edit on 13-8-2011 by Illustronic because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 13-8-2011 @ 02:24 PM by CaptainInstaban
reply to post by Illustronic



Look, I think you did a good job and you were right.

Do I need to do more grovelling? I will if it makes you feel better.

And it wasn´t Phang that the proof, imo, it was Excalibur.

Why do you call him Phang?

Oh, and just noticed, is your avatar giving me the cosmic finger?


reply posted on 13-8-2011 @ 03:10 PM by Illustronic
reply to post by CaptainInstaban



No sir I have a short (short term) memory if I misspelled other poster's board names, I'm not a good typer either and don't check many posts I type. I may be overly reactionary. I meant no ill will to you personally, I may have grown such attitude by the number of posts you had on this thread defending something I suspected to be woo. I will not hold anything against you for your curiosity whatsoever.

I hold things against people who continuously bash the sources they gather information from to discredit that very source of the information they got, verbatim, with no other logical support or other reputable source sited. That kind of thing kinda bus me.
Pages: <<  5    6    7    8  >>    ^^TOP^^