Originally posted by Theosophical
reply to post by John_Rodger_Cornman
I always thought the lodges were being used as breeding grounds.
Don't the people higher up look for good candidates in the Masonic lodges?
Originally posted by Skyfloating
1. Partly false. But some are.
Banks must do Business beyond the borders of their nation if they want to be taken seriously by their customers. Global reach is quite common and no indication of evil.
For the most part. But its that small element that spoils the bunch. Ask Bill Gates,Zbig, and the rest of CFR. They know more about it than me.Come on selling fraudulent toxic loans is good right? Stealing tax money is also good correct?
4. Yes it does.
Freemasonry as such has no political power since more than 70 years. Get with the program.
That's your opinion.You can believe that if you want
5. Yes it is.
Freemasonry is not worth subverting. Its just a group of local guys hanging out together to get away from the wives, performing antiquated ritual, having a beer together and exercising fellowship. No evil in sight.
who said anything about evil. You said that not me.
6. Rockefellers/standard oil funded Mao,Hitler Rothschilds funded the communist revolution in Russia.
Hitler or Stalin purchasing oil from an oil company does not mean that this oil company "funded" them. They had to purchase their oil somewhere for all the tanks, cars, machinery etc.
who owns the oil comapanies? Peter Pan or the Bushes and Rockefellers
7. Operation Northwoods, 911.
Operation Northwoods is ONE proven false-flag Operation. Compare that to 100000000 conflicts
that are not.
So you think that was the only false flag they executed? If so.../THREAD
"Your opinion is noted"
Opinion is a subjective belief, an idea you have about reality.
Your belief that lodges are not a target for the nwo is flawed. Look up wikipedia for fallacy
Fact is an objective reality that can be experienced by many.edit on 12-8-2011 by Skyfloating because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by John_Rodger_CornmanNo, sadly, the evidence backs up Skyfloating's position pretty well. In the 1960s about one in every 20 men in the United States was a Freemason. Today the number is less than 1 in a hundred. (There are almost 3 million less Masons in the US today then there were in 1959; also take into consideration that the population of the US has grown significantly in the last 50 years, and you can see how the ratio has fallen so steeply.)
Freemasonry as such has no political power since more than 70 years. Get with the program.
That's your opinion.You can believe that if you want
Originally posted by JoshNorton
Originally posted by John_Rodger_CornmanNo, sadly, the evidence backs up Skyfloating's position pretty well. In the 1960s about one in every 20 men in the United States was a Freemason. Today the number is less than 1 in a hundred. (There are almost 3 million less Masons in the US today then there were in 1959; also take into consideration that the population of the US has grown significantly in the last 50 years, and you can see how the ratio has fallen so steeply.)
Freemasonry as such has no political power since more than 70 years. Get with the program.
That's your opinion.You can believe that if you want
The Masonic involvement was highest in the years following WWII. Men coming back from the war sought a camaraderie, and Masonry was one such outlet. In the 1960s, though, people became more individualistic. There were fewer "joiners".
My position is that the number of Masons in "postions of power", whether that be political or in the business world, has likely shifted in step with the overall percentage of Masons in the country. Thus if there's a huge percentage decrease in overall US Masonic membership in comparison to the US population, then it follows that there are fewer Masons in politics today than there were in the 1960s.
The statsedit on 2011.8.12 by JoshNorton because: (no reason given)
