It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Veilwalker
P.S. the only(and incredibly major) downside is, TPTB will try to whack him and his son too. can't let that happen, no matter what.
Originally posted by MainLineThis
reply to post by hawkiye
You are 100% correct, but as this thread has showed, normal folk are too stupid to see through it. That is why the "save the children b.s" works so well.....the average voter is an idiot, and lacks the intelligence to actually understand the base logic behind the very laws that govern them.
So, time and time again politicians will use the "save the children" garbage because they understand that people are frigging idiots and it works. Those that actually use logic, reason and common sense in their actions get idiotic thread like this one made about them, which was done either by a political hack, a paid internet troll...or one of the LEGIONS of ignorant American voters (that last one should scare the heck out of all of us).
I used to think the future was going to be so bright....with the advent of the internet....information at the tips of anyone's fingers....I thought the advancement of society would progress exponentially. Imagine my surprise when, 35 years later, I find that people are as stupid, if not dumberer (lol) than any time I can every remember.....
I would like to take this time to invent a time machine and go back 20 years or so to slap every mom and dad in America and tell them to pull their heads out of their asses and give two craps about the education of their children. We are now stuck with an entire generation of IDIOTS and we are all paying the price.....
Originally posted by Maslo
The measure would make it a crime to pander visual illustrations of children as child pornography.
What exactly does this mean? I don’t agree with criminalizing child porn drawings.
Originally posted by Ironclad
Also just read what one of the restrictions on the bill says... "The measure would make it a crime to pander visual illustrations of children as child pornography."
OK so this would mean any image of a child, any illustration...!! That is exactly what it will be, cause that is what it specifically states.. "VISUAL ILLUSTRATIONs"...!! This could literally mean any image at all..!!
Can't take pics of your kids enjoying a day at the beach, can't take pics of your kids in the school concert, cant take pics of your child’s first steps... Hell, no more children in the movies either..lol You'd be pushing child porn..!!!
So who writes these bills...? Mostly old middle aged busybodies from the bible group, who've never even had kids because they too frigid to take their clothes off to make them,...lol
Originally posted by ClintK
Just got back. Saw the insults. I give up.
Ron Paul is God. That's what everyone wants to hear.
Originally posted by kro32
reply to post by filosophia
So your kid get's abducted from a playground or somewhere and you wouldn't want every available resource to get that child back?
I find that hard to believe.
Originally posted by robyn
I can't believe this thread is 18 pages long.
The truth was ferreted out in the first 3 pages...
1) He voted against it because it would hurt the existing state level Amber Alert system. Thereby doing more harm than good.
2) The bill contained other amendments that stunk.
The premise of this thread is a good example of common disinformation techniques though.