It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Government-controlled Freddie Mac requested $1.5 billion in additional federal aid Monday after posting a loss this spring. The mortgage giant also said Standard & Poor's decision to lower its debt rating will cause "major disruptions" in the home-lending market.
Freddie Mac said it lost $4.7 billion, or $1.44 cents per share, in the April-June quarter. It compares with a loss of $6 billion, or $1.85 per share, during the same quarter in 2010.
The government rescued McLean, Va.-based Freddie Mac and sibling company Fannie Mae in September 2008 after massive losses on risky mortgages threatened to topple them. Since then, a government regulator has controlled their financial decisions.
Fannie and Freddie own or guarantee about half of all U.S. mortgages and nearly all new mortgage loans. The mortgage giants buy home loans from banks and other lenders, package them into bonds with a guarantee against default, and then sell them to investors around the world.
Taxpayers have spent roughly $150 billion to rescue Fannie and Freddie, the most expensive bailout of the 2008 financial crisis. The government estimates the final cost for rescuing the firms could go as high as $259 billion.
.
Washington-based Fannie Mae said Friday that its second-quarter loss widened to nearly $5.2 billion. It continues to seek loan modifications to reduce defaults. That compares with a loss of $3.13 billion a year earlier.
Originally posted by TheWalkingFox
reply to post by kro32
"Serious backlash?" Like what? voting for whoever stapled the most bags of Lipton to their skull? Sorry, but the American voting public is as big a bunch of clowns as the morons they keep electing. Our definition of a "serious backlash" seems to be kicking out the stupid people, and bringing in vastly stupider people who yelled louder.
Originally posted by TheWalkingFox
reply to post by kro32
"Serious backlash?" Like what? voting for whoever stapled the most bags of Lipton to their skull? Sorry, but the American voting public is as big a bunch of clowns as the morons they keep electing. Our definition of a "serious backlash" seems to be kicking out the stupid people, and bringing in vastly stupider people who yelled louder.
Originally posted by jibeho
You like to lash out at other people and their parties without ever revealing your deck of cards. Let me guess... Ralph Nader?
We've got problems in this country that have compounded over the last 15 years. What do you propose as a solution? Remember, we can no longer spend what we don't have.
Furthermore, Obama's new "gang of twelve" will be hand selected by the likes of career politicians like Pelosi, McConnell and Reid. Newsflash! None of them have anything to do with the Tea Party and they will be the ones who have been granted sole authority to pick those who will solve our nations debt problem by completely circumventing our nation's legislative process. How does that sit with you?
Seems more like Obama's 12 Apostles to me.
Originally posted by kro32
reply to post by jibeho
Ok you are way off the mark there. Please tell me how they are circumventing the legislation process? Last I heard they will offer a recommendation which the full Congress has to pass or else they have to redo it until it has enough votes.
Tell me how this is different than any other bill that get's submitted to Congress?
reply to post by jibeho
Time to bite the bullet and cut em off or give them the money but insist of a total reorganization from the ground up with all current management fired and replaced by people picked personally by Ron Paul.