It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by dolphinfan
The folly of Obama's economic policy has had a number of terrible results, but a number of results that have set the stage for a massive increase in the wealth of the wealthy.
The mismanagement of the banking crisis, failure to institute reasonable regulatory reforms and a lack of direction on the tax, entitlement and debt fronts have driven corporations, banks and the wealthy to hoard cash or move to safe haven assets like metals. The policies of the Obama administration have provided tremendous incentives for corporations to cut costs (further incented by tax breaks for infrastructure investments), lay folks off and increase automation.
Corporate profits are now at an all time high in many cases, yet stocks have been hammered.
Folks on the left clap their hands when they see the paper losses of the wealthy and for certain the wealthy are not happy about it. What happens now? People are selling stocks, taking capital losses which will off set their 2011 tax obligations. For a president who thinks the rich don't pay enough in taxes, wait until he sees how little taxes the rich pay this year. The rich don't live off of their annual compensation, they live off of investment income taxed at 15% capital gains rates. When the market bottoms out, the rich will buy back heavily into the market, dollar cost averaging their share prices and when the market rebounds, and it will, their wealth will explode.
Forcing folks into cash and then incompetently managing the economy leading to a market crash is a dream environment for serious investors. When the DOW comes back to 15,000 and it might take three years, many folks think - "oh they rich just got back what they lost". No they did not. They have in many cases significantly increased their positions in the market, off-set by declared tax losses and while the market index is only where it was prior to the crash, the rich have more stock and are thus far richer than they were.
Ironic that the gent who hates every rich person (other than those he chooses to hang out with) he has just executed a near perfect game plan to make them a whole lot richer.
Originally posted by neo96
i wasnt going to post here because i am tired of threads that end up bashing the rich and corporations.
the war on the rich has been the most successful war that has ever been fought and for all intensive purposes it has be won.
Originally posted by neo96
i wasnt going to post here because i am tired of threads that end up bashing the rich and corporations.
the war on the rich has been the most successful war that has ever been fought and for all intensive purposes it has be won.
....It's the Republicans that are out to make the rich richer in the hope that some of that wealth may eventually trickle back down to the peons. We've had 30 years to prove the fallacy of that economic policy....
“...Today three companies, Archer Daniels Midland, Cargill, and Bunge control the world’s grain trade. Chemical giant Monsanto controls three-fifths of seed production. Unsurprisingly, in the last quarter of 2007, even as the world food crisis was breaking, Archer Daniels Midland’s profits jumped 20%, Monsanto 45%, and Cargill 60%. Recent speculation with food commodities has created another dangerous “boom.” After buying up grains and grain futures, traders are hoarding, withholding stocks and further inflating prices....” www.globalissues.org...
...Dwayne Orville Andreas (born 4 March 1918) is one of the most prominent political campaign donors[1] in the United States, having contributed millions of dollars to Democratic and Republican candidates alike....
Andreas commands much respect among Washington politicians for his largesse. As part of the investigations surrounding illegal campaign fundraising linked to the Watergate scandal, Andreas was charged with (but acquitted of) illegally contributing $100,000 to Hubert Humphrey's 1968 presidential campaign. In 1972 Andreas unlawfully contributed $25,000 to President Nixon's re-election campaign via Watergate burglar Bernard Barker. Other recipients of Andreas's "tithing" — as he puts it — have included George H. W. Bush, Jimmy Carter, Bill Clinton, Bob Dole, Michael Dukakis, Jesse Jackson, and Jack Kemp.
According to Mother Jones magazine:
“ During the 1992 election, Andreas gave more than $1.4 million in soft money and $345,000 to individual candidates, using multiple donors in his company and family members (including wife Inez) to circumvent contribution limits.”
en.wikipedia.org...
Wow that does actually seem like some scheme they've got going on here....
Too bad the losers in DC can't apply that to terrorism, poverty, drugs, crime or anything else you can think of.