posted on Aug, 8 2011 @ 02:48 PM
I have a few issues with this, and I would like to offer discussion on them.
1) Why is using a religious weakness a crime? Though I disagree with the tactics, a legitimately sanctioned investigation should use all avenues
available to them. If a women offers herself up sexually and an agent takes advantage of the situation to gian intel on a criminal operation that
could save lives, it ultimately falls on the woman for making herself available. The bible, and the koran address temptation, and if someone is tested
and fails, that is something they should take up with their god, not a court.
2) Why bother being secretive about their practices. Informing the population that this investigation is taking place, and the methods used, does not
compromise it. In fact, telling the 'terrorists' if they really exist that you're keeping an eye on them is only beneficial as the reality of
having to watch your every move, and look over your shoulder indefinately only increases your margin for error. Why can't we tell the 'terrorists'
to be scared, because we are coming for them. To never sleep soundly or falter.
3) Why aren't we supporting a real investigation of the supposed enemies, when we are screaming for an investigation of our own letter agencies and
government in general in it's complicity, or complacency. The fastest way to exposing the real men behind the curtain is to let them reveal
themselves. Let these maniacs have what they desire to do their jobs, because when they come up empty handed there will be nowhere left to point the
finger but at the mirror.
In the end, we are all responsible for the state of the union, and instead of pointing fingers at someone else, let us point it right back at