It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The plane is scheduled to be the first to carry commercial passengers in the 787 Dreamliner series, which has been plagued by delays but promises to revolutionize air travel.
"We are rolling out the first delivery airplane, the first 787. That's an amazing thing for those who have worked on the program five, six, seven years, here at Boeing and our partners around the world," said Scott Fancher, Boeing's vice president and general manager of the 787 program.
The plane is the first commercial airliner to be made mostly of carbon composites or super durable plastic. Those materials mean a lighter plane that Boeing says could use 20% less fuel than conventional airliners, making way for a more environmentally-friendly and cost effective aircraft option for airlines.
So far, according to Boeing, the manufacturer has more than 800 orders for the 787 Dreamliner, which has a list price of about $200 million per plane.
The future of a new assembly plant in South Carolina is also in doubt. Boeing's machinist union accuses the manufacturer of putting the plant there rather than in Washington state to take advantage of South Carolina's weaker labor laws.
"I would say the biggest challenge is as they head into this ramp up is making sure 787 is as profitable for themselves as they hope it will be for their customers," Ostrower said.
The airline will inaugurate the 787 Dreamliner on a special charter from Tokyo to Hong Kong this fall, the company said.
Originally posted by Afterthought
It's a shame that a plane made out of lead would never get into the air.
Ah, yes. Let's discuss my personal opinion about flying instead of the article.
First, I'd never get on a 787 if it has been stationed and flown mainly in Japan.
Second, I'm boycotting the aero industry until they get rid of the molesters looking for home grown terrrorists.
I have no reason to fly. I can easily drive anywhere I need to go at this point in time.
sort of but not exactly. All planes are exposed to radiation as a result of high altitude. But the planes themselves never actually become radioactive. An analogy would be exposing food to radiation in a microwave, it cooks the food, but it's not radioactive and safe to eat (provided you didn't burn it or the container it was in). But yes, if you fly, you get exposed to radiation, in any country, not just Japan.
Originally posted by Human0815
You know not much about Radiation!
All Planes are Radioactive,
because they are flying in the upper Atmosphere.
Again, sort of. Avoiding contaminated food is certainly a good suggestion. This map shows the most contaminated areas in red:
Japan is as far as i know, think and wish not sooooooo Radioactive
that you need to fear a contamination just by boarding this Plane
or using any other Product made here!
(avoid the food only)
miraclemaster
reply to post by Arbitrageur
I finally flew the 787 a couple of months ago. What a great experience - I felt much less jetlag than usual. Had a great experience www.mightytravels.com...
LightningStrikesHere
miraclemaster
reply to post by Arbitrageur
I finally flew the 787 a couple of months ago. What a great experience - I felt much less jetlag than usual. Had a great experience www.mightytravels.com...
You say "flew" as in piloted it? ,or you were just a passenger? Can you elaborate a little more on the flight systems ?
Sounds like a death trap to me to honest ..lol
Humbly
LSH
Human0815
You know not much about Radiation!
All Planes are Radioactive,
because they are flying in the upper Atmosphere.
originally posted by: Afterthought
I don't know about anyone else's opinion, but I wouldn't board one of these planes after it had been sitting in Japan for even fifteen minutes. I wonder if the flight crew's uniforms will be hazmat/containment suits. Do the planes have built in geiger counters?