It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ANNED
first his meter is set on microsieverts(mcSv)
this is 1000 times lower then millisieverts(mSv)
this is 1000,000 times lower one sieverts(Sv/)
1 Sv=100 rems
if you eat a banana every day is equivalent to 3.6 mrem per year.
Maximum allowable exposure for U.S. radiation workers 50Sv/yr
You are exposed in a CT scan to about 15 mSv
Now to cover the video rain absorbs radon gas and will absorb radioactive dust from coal fired power plants.
you have 6 coal fired power plants within 150 miles of Oklahoma City.
www.blackcatsystems.com...
While it is true that there is a slight increase in radiation does due to living close to a nuclear power plant, typically on the order of 0.01 mrem a year (insignificant), the average dose from living near a coal fired power plant is three times as high! This is due to the release of uranium/etc naturally mixed in with the coal.
Originally posted by 4nsicphd
Originally posted by type0civ
reply to post by vermonster
Is that geiger counter from walmart? Looks like an Ipod app to me.
And we have a winner! It is a fake radiation detector app like this: itunes.apple.com...
Good catch.
Originally posted by vermonster
Originally posted by type0civ
reply to post by vermonster
Is that geiger counter from walmart? Looks like an Ipod app to me.
Jump to conclusions much?
That is a 'SOEKS Geiger counter'
Originally posted by vermonster
VIDEO VIDEO VIDEO
Holy moly.
This video was allegedly taken in Oklahoma City on 8/6/11.
It shows a man wiping rain water off of trash cans and then placing what appears to be a geiger counter on top of the wipe-rag making the counter go way up.
I would love to hear some expert ATS opinions on this.
edit on 7-8-2011 by vermonster because: (no reason given)edit on 7-8-2011 by vermonster because: embedded video
Originally posted by muzzleflash
1.6 uSv per hour = 14,016 uSv per year.
(1.6x24x365 = 14,016)
Using the calculator, at hptech.org, that 14016 micro sieverts is 1.4 rem.
(For a whole year).
According to the NRC.gov Website we are exposed to roughly 620 millirem per year, or .62 rem (Average).
So due to the contamination of the rain, Oklahoma City has over double, almost triple the amount of radiation as the accepted averages. These averages are including things like medical procedures (which I am never exposed to), industry (we are all exposed to), consumer products (only some people are exposed),
The natural sources account for only .31 rem. Which is less than 1/5th of the reading in Oklahoma City.
We are talking around 5x the natural background radiation exposure averages here. Pretty startling and upsetting, to be frank about it.
Originally posted by Nicolas Flamel
reply to post by muzzleflash
It seems like fewer independent news sources are reporting on radiation fallout. Germany stopped their radiation forecast maps on July 29 with no reason given So urce
So are we supposed to trust TEPCO's forecasts? If this wasn't so sad I would laugh.
With regards to "radiation being good for you", most doctors will tell you the safe limit is ZERO. Some are calling "'Radiation hormesis an incredible lie'. Probably a lie by industry lackeys. Source
Originally posted by Nicolas Flamel
reply to post by muzzleflash
So are we supposed to trust TEPCO's forecasts? If this wasn't so sad I would laugh.
TEPCO is expected to play a key role in achieving Japan's targets for reduced carbon dioxide emissions under the Kyoto Protocol.
Originally posted by Glassbender777
I live 2 hours to the east of OKC and it did rain on Aug 6th, but just breifly. Wonder if this radiation crap has accumulated in the atmosphere, because we have had No rain for so long now. I dont know just a thought. We have had a record number of days without rain, and a record number of days, where heat exceeded triple digits. Kinda getting scary, one little lightining strike or ciggarette thrown out the car, and boom you have forest fire.
Originally posted by vermonster
So, muzzle can you recommend a quality geiger counter?
Originally posted by muzzleflash
Originally posted by Glassbender777
I live 2 hours to the east of OKC and it did rain on Aug 6th, but just breifly. Wonder if this radiation crap has accumulated in the atmosphere, because we have had No rain for so long now. I dont know just a thought. We have had a record number of days without rain, and a record number of days, where heat exceeded triple digits. Kinda getting scary, one little lightining strike or ciggarette thrown out the car, and boom you have forest fire.
I don't think it has accumulated really, due to the wind constantly blowing it.
What you are getting right now was not over Oklahoma a week ago. Imagine the jet stream and cloud systems, they are in constant motion.
The only actual accumulation is due to various sources (like Fukushima) continually adding more of the product into the air.
And there is a factor where it dissipates as it decays, so this lessens the impact over time. However many of the radioisotopes we are looking at take very long time periods to decay. Hundreds of years or longer in some cases, or with other isotopes it may decay within a few weeks.
Also it gets diluted which lessens the radioactivity of any given square foot.
But keep in mind dilution actually sucks, it means that all this junk is going to get over everything now (if it hasn't already), and it will not stay put in one location.
So it's a extremely complex equation, and I doubt we even have computer models that could really get an accurate depiction of the actual reality going on...
But overall this means radiation levels globally will be on the increase until the source is stopped (a sharp increase on the graph), and then it will take a very long time for the materials to decay to a level where it becomes negligible, which will appear as a very broad and slow downward slope on the graph from the climax point (we have not reached climax levels yet).
Originally posted by vermonster
TEPCO is expected to play a key role in achieving Japan's targets for reduced carbon dioxide emissions under the Kyoto Protocol.
en.wikipedia.org...
no, those men are liars
A nuclear explosion creates a fallout 'soup' of 200 or so different radioactive isotopes, that become ever more dispersed over distance downwind, weakening with every passing hour, and whatever little still remains far downwind, that we might later inhale or ingest then, is even further dispersed in our bodies.
Originally posted by Backslider
It should also be taken into consideration that more radionuclides have been released into the Pacific than into the air. Precipitation cycles will keep this radiation falling on us in the rain long after Fukushima has been stabilized.
Originally posted by muzzleflash
Originally posted by ANNED
first his meter is set on microsieverts(mcSv)
this is 1000 times lower then millisieverts(mSv)
this is 1000,000 times lower one sieverts(Sv/)
1 Sv=100 rems
if you eat a banana every day is equivalent to 3.6 mrem per year.
Maximum allowable exposure for U.S. radiation workers 50Sv/yr
You are exposed in a CT scan to about 15 mSv
Now to cover the video rain absorbs radon gas and will absorb radioactive dust from coal fired power plants.
you have 6 coal fired power plants within 150 miles of Oklahoma City.
www.blackcatsystems.com...
Aha I did the math and you are busted.
Your own very source you linked claims this:
While it is true that there is a slight increase in radiation does due to living close to a nuclear power plant, typically on the order of 0.01 mrem a year (insignificant), the average dose from living near a coal fired power plant is three times as high! This is due to the release of uranium/etc naturally mixed in with the coal.
They are saying the coal plant pollution only equates to roughly .03 mrem per year.
Look at my post above, I gave links and did the calculations. This rain equates to 1.4rem or 1406 mrem per year!
Like 30,000-40,000 times higher than what you are trying to pass it off as. Amazing isn't it?
1406 / .03 = 46,766
I guess the coal power plant suggestion doesn't hold up to serious investigation. It certainly does not explain the 1.6+ uSv reading in the rain to my satisfaction...edit on 8-8-2011 by muzzleflash because: (no reason given)
This rain equates to 1.4rem or 1406 mrem per year!
its .0014 rem or .0001406 mrem.
1 uSV =1 mcSv mc and u are interchangeable for microsievert. m is millisieverts.
1 mSv = 1000 mcSv
Originally posted by ANNED
its .0014 rem or .0001406 mrem.
1 uSV =1 mcSv mc and u are interchangeable for microsievert. m is millisieverts.
1 mSv = 1000 mcSv
1.6 uSv per hour = 14,016 uSv per year. (1.6x24x365 = 14,016) Using the calculator, at hptech.org, that 14016 micro sieverts is 1.4 rem. (For a whole year).