It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

India ...Will the World Be Consumed?....case for population limitation of All Nations?

page: 1
1

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 6 2011 @ 06:33 PM
link   
Below are some sobering stastistics.
Birth rate:
(World average: 19.86 births/1,000 population)
( India ( 21.34 births/1,000 population)
(United States: 13.83 births/1,000 population)
(Singapore: 8.65 births/1,000 population)
(Japan: 7.41 births/1,000 population)
China: 12.17 births/1,000 population (2010 est.)


Indias population by2100 will be approx 1.8 billlion souls.
More and more of the worlds resources and foood will be consumed by a rapidly prosperous India.
Should a population limit be imposed on all nations?
Unless we colonise mars or the moon surely we are all going to be in trouble?



edit on 6-8-2011 by Dr Expired because: Title spellingg




posted on Aug, 6 2011 @ 06:36 PM
link   
Well, once you reach the max capacity, itll stop anymore raising. Got enough food for 20 mice, only 20 mice live.



posted on Aug, 6 2011 @ 06:46 PM
link   
Don't worry, when the comet gets here, most people will die. So it will be fine, for a while. Just hope you are one of the lucky ones. Or maybe not, it probably won't be much fun for a long time.

This has happened before, and it will happen again.



posted on Aug, 6 2011 @ 06:52 PM
link   
Will the world be cosumed? You mean consumed. And yes it will.



posted on Aug, 6 2011 @ 06:59 PM
link   

Originally posted by Underlord13
Will the world be cosumed? You mean consumed. And yes it will.


Thanks for that , at least I didn't spell it costumed?
Some of those hindu garbs are pretty out there.



posted on Aug, 6 2011 @ 07:14 PM
link   
It's funny how one of the most sexually oppressive cultures actually has a lead in the baby making column.

When will they realize their own hypocrisy?



posted on Aug, 6 2011 @ 07:15 PM
link   

Originally posted by Dr Expired
Indias population by2100 will be approx 1.8 billlion souls.


I see one of three things happening before this scenario. Maybe a little of each.

1. The Earth's resources will have been depleted to the point that the death rate will surpass the birth rate.

2. We will have had too many large scale wars that we would have culled ourselves into a survivable population.

3. Earth will have shaken us off like the fleas we are in a bid to start its recovery process.

Whatever happens, I believe it's unrealistic and even arrogant on our part to consider we are smart enough to have the chance of surviving into the year 2100. Another 90 years? I just can't see it.

We have been here for a sliver in time and when we are gone, the Universe won't even notice our passing.



edit on 6-8-2011 by jude11 because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 6 2011 @ 07:21 PM
link   

Originally posted by Dr Expired
Below are some sobering stastistics.
Birth rate:
(World average: 19.86 births/1,000 population)
( India ( 21.34 births/1,000 population)
(United States: 13.83 births/1,000 population)
(Singapore: 8.65 births/1,000 population)
(Japan: 7.41 births/1,000 population)
China: 12.17 births/1,000 population (2010 est.)


Indias population by2100 will be approx 1.8 billlion souls.
More and more of the worlds resources and foood will be consumed by a rapidly prosperous India.
Should a population limit be imposed on all nations?
Unless we colonise mars or the moon surely we are all going to be in trouble?



edit on 6-8-2011 by Dr Expired because: Title spellingg
Well this doesnt surprise me after i heard somoone talking about a document somewere stating that population control shpuld be #1 or depopulation one of the two idk which one



posted on Aug, 6 2011 @ 10:35 PM
link   

Originally posted by jude11

Originally posted by Dr Expired
Indias population by2100 will be approx 1.8 billlion souls.


I see one of three things happening before this scenario. Maybe a little of each.

1. The Earth's resources will have been depleted to the point that the death rate will surpass the birth rate.

2. We will have had too many large scale wars that we would have culled ourselves into a survivable population.

3. Earth will have shaken us off like the fleas we are in a bid to start its recovery process.

Whatever happens, I believe it's unrealistic and even arrogant on our part to consider we are smart enough to have the chance of surviving into the year 2100. Another 90 years? I just can't see it.

We have been here for a sliver in time and when we are gone, the Universe won't even notice our passing.



edit on 6-8-2011 by jude11 because: (no reason given)


The Neanderthals were overwhelmed and mad eobsolete by the modern human.
The Indian and Western cultures are in some ways just as different as the Human and Neanderthal ones?
One will win and yes the Earth will go on and on.
The stars will shine and the moon will still be there.
The majiority alays wins in the end.



posted on Aug, 7 2011 @ 04:24 AM
link   
Don't worry, we're doomed to have war when resources get tight.




top topics



 
1

log in

join