Well, at this stage of the game it seems inevitable that depopulation will commence by our own doing or natures.
Just drink your green tea, and hope some of us evolve out of this mess we've set up for ourselves.
Originally posted by michael1983l
In reply to the part in the title "possible 100m deaths".
Well first of all let me tell you it is never nice to see a fellow human being die and nor will I ever rejoice in the event. However looking out of the box it might be said that this could have a posative effect on the human race in the short term. The planet IS over populated and there soon will not be enough food or wtarer to go around. Maybe a loss on this scale will inadvertently reinvigorate the human race. We consume too much for this planet to sustain cureently im afraid.
Originally posted by Gradius Maximus
reply to post by unityemissions
Perhaps you lack the imagination to see a world where everyone farms and provides.
We could handle double this population if methods were put in place to manage it properly.
Setting up cycles of giving and receiving from nature down to the individual person is much easier to do then most would believe. Elites dont want that, because then you stop spending, and they are out of a job.
When there is too many people, mother nature will preform a cull, its that simple.
You are not in control. No one is, which means, the human race is guaranteed to survive.
Originally posted by LexiconV
reply to post by quedup
I wish reporters who quote dead people would say when they the person actually said what they said. As far as I understand, Mr Gunderson died over a week ago, with other sites saying he died back in March. Anyone know exactly what day he died or even if he has died? If he is dead I wonder how long Arnie's ghost is going to be in communication with journalists.