Denver airport mason keypad code, page 3
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 1 times


reply posted on 20-8-2004 @ 09:04 PM by Skibum
A runway that is approx 20,000 feet long by 100 yards wide by I believe 3-5 feet deep was being built to handle the growing international flights. That what was told to me.




So they probably unloaded around 20 cars a day 7 days a week. This project lasted for 9 months


Using your figures:

20,000 feet (length) times 300 feet (width) times 4 feet(the average of the figures you gave for depth)=24 million cubic feet of concrete


20 cars a day for seven days a week for nine months

20cars x 270 days=5,400 cars

www.gatx.com...

didnt know what type car you used so I calculated with 3000 cubic feet capacity which is bigger than the 2880 of the open top aggregate hopper shown on the site above.


5,400 cars times 3000 cubic feet each is 16.2 million cubic feet.

Using the figures you gave 16.2 million cubic feet of concrete is considerably less than 24 million cubic feet required (again using your figures).


reply posted on 20-8-2004 @ 09:28 PM by Skibum
That being said.

I found this after doing the calculations.



Nearly 2.9 million cubic yards of concrete were used to construct six runways, taxiways and aprons


www.flydenver.com...

so I don't know if that has anything to do with what we are talking about




Runways were built in layers, beginning with six feet of compacted, non-expansive soil, followed by a rototilled 12-inch layer of lime-treated soil to form a subgrade. On top of the subgrade are eight inches of a cement-treated base, topped with 17 inches of concrete.




reply posted on 22-8-2004 @ 09:58 PM by jimbolux1
Sep 3, 2003
Denver International Airport is to get USD$71.25 million in federal help to improve baggage security screening.

The money, from the US Transportation Safety Administration, will cover 75 percent of the cost of a new state-of-the-art automated screening system.

The new technology will take 16 months to install.
news.airwise.com...

That seems like overkill on the new upgrades considering the airport is brand new and the baggage system was supposed to be one of the most technologically advanced made.

And in regards to the layout of the runways, I can understand that the design may accomodate more aircraft landing at the same time. But from what I understand from a pilot buddy of mine told me that runways are typically laid out to compensate for the weather conditions of the area and the Navaids that are available.

If anyone could find information on the flight patterns and Navaids around Denver that might help in determining the reason for the layout other than to make it look like a swastika.

Also crosswinds have to play a major part in Denver being at the elevation it is, I don't understand how they could accept more than 2 runways to be operational at a time for saftey reasons.


[edit on 25-8-2004 by jimbolux1]


reply posted on 23-8-2004 @ 08:37 AM by cmdrkeenkid
with all of the discussion about the denver airport runways, i went straight to the aeronautical source.


www.colorado-aeronautics.org...

Remarks: All runways are 12000'x150' and are concrete. Large commercial service airport. Landing fees apply to all aircraft. ATIS 125.6 (Arr) (303) 342-0819/ 134.025 (Dep) (303) 342-0820, ASOS (303) 342-0838, UNI 122.95. See current U.S. AFD and visit website at www.flydenver.com for additional information.


not to mention down at the bottom of the website it says it was last modified Friday, June 11, 2004.

so, all other sources aside, the pilot in me tells me to trust this moreso than anything else.



reply posted on 25-8-2004 @ 10:56 AM by Byrd
Originally posted by jimbolux1
Besides, the runways seem to be very much in right angles... a very masonic representation. (right angles, horizontals, and perpendiculars)


Mmmkay. I can tell right there that you're not a pilot and haven't much experience with planes.

The reason they're at "right angles" has to do with traffic AND weather patterns in the area. Planes can't just fly into any kind of wind direction. If you're at the wrong angle to the wind, the plane becomes dangerously unstable.

So.. unless you're somehow going to prove that Masons control the weather pattern, that argument collapses immediately.

There is a ton of strange sybolism in the murals that are just plain sick to look at. It is art, and what is art to one person may not be to the next. But in such a major public venue, there is a message that is to be taken from them.


And I can tell you don't have much exposure to Mexican mural-style art. The artist is Hispanic and this is a traditional style with some very traditional Hispanic and US cultural elements in it.

But Geometry is very evidently used in the floor pattern designs and in the designs of the airport itself... it seems to me there was a mason at one of the wheels of design.


...and (no offense) that you don't have much experience with building houses and architectural design. Geometric patterns make a place look less barren and less bleak and there are certain patterns that people seem to prefer.

I would love to hear more feedback from more masons about the symbology, geometry, and dedication in the DIA.


I'm betting the answer is "none" and that the only Masonic symbology there is actually on that plaque (whatever it's there for.) Since you haven't stepped inside a Masonic building, you probably wouldn't be familiar with what they really look like. This is simply Good Architecture and a mural from a culture that you're obviously not familiar with.



reply posted on 25-8-2004 @ 01:34 PM by jimbolux1
Originally posted by Byrd
Originally posted by jimbolux1
Besides, the runways seem to be very much in right angles... a very masonic representation. (right angles, horizontals, and perpendiculars)


Mmmkay. I can tell right there that you're not a pilot and haven't much experience with planes.

The reason they're at "right angles" has to do with traffic AND weather patterns in the area. Planes can't just fly into any kind of wind direction. If you're at the wrong angle to the wind, the plane becomes dangerously unstable.

So.. unless you're somehow going to prove that Masons control the weather pattern, that argument collapses immediately.


I mentioned in another post in this same thread that the layout of the runways are strange because typically they are designed to accomodate for wind conditions and the navaids available to the pilots. I don't understand how they could allow more than 2 runways to be open at a time, but hey if the wind just doesn't move over there in Denver than I guess placing runways at right angles to each other is perfect!


Originally posted by Byrd
Originally posted by jimbolux1
There is a ton of strange sybolism in the murals that are just plain sick to look at. It is art, and what is art to one person may not be to the next. But in such a major public venue, there is a message that is to be taken from them.


And I can tell you don't have much exposure to Mexican mural-style art. The artist is Hispanic and this is a traditional style with some very traditional Hispanic and US cultural elements in it.


Ok, so I don't study creepy Mexican murals. Ok, just look a little deeper... they don't look so traditional to me... of course I am not an expert (which you like to point out) but I have been to museums, and went to school and college and saw some strage art in my time... but that art is a bit disturbing for Denver. And what is one persons art may not be anothers, but the art does contain symbolism of some sort, in fact I think I read an interview with the artist who described what each mural was about.

He may not find it strange, and you may not, but I'll bet you that many people do.

Originally posted by Byrd
Originally posted by jimbolux1
But Geometry is very evidently used in the floor pattern designs and in the designs of the airport itself... it seems to me there was a mason at one of the wheels of design.


...and (no offense) that you don't have much experience with building houses and architectural design. Geometric patterns make a place look less barren and less bleak and there are certain patterns that people seem to prefer.


That is why there are vaulted ceilings, archways, and patterned tile and flooring and they make things look nice. Ok... if you like I will retract the statement that masons were at work with the design of the DIA. Even though there are millions of masons in the U.S. I am sure that not one single mason would have worked on the DIA. I mean why would they? It's not like they hold real jobs... they just sit and conspire about just all day long.

Originally posted by Byrd
Originally posted by jimbolux1
I would love to hear more feedback from more masons about the symbology, geometry, and dedication in the DIA.


I'm betting the answer is "none" and that the only Masonic symbology there is actually on that plaque (whatever it's there for.) Since you haven't stepped inside a Masonic building, you probably wouldn't be familiar with what they really look like. This is simply Good Architecture and a mural from a culture that you're obviously not familiar with.


Your right... I haven't read really anything from a mason that has said anything about any symbology in the DIA. I was just asking to see if anyone who was a mason could see any masonic sybolism in the design and patterns of the DIA. But there weren't really any responses on that, so I guess there isn't any.


Oh yeah,

You are right, I am not a pilot. But a friend of mine, that I have known since 14, who is now a captain for a commercial airline, and was a CFI (Certified Flight Instructor) was teaching me for a while.

You were right again, I don't know much about Mexican or Hispanic art. But my brother is a very well respected artist in a major city in the U.S. and has painted many murals, paintings, created sculptures, won awards, was published, in the news, owned a gallery and worked as the art director for many new and old buildings buying art for the spaces. So, art to me is a foreign subject as well.

And right again... no, I don't design or build houses or other pieces of architecture. But I did take drafting in high school and architectural design in college... but I don't really remember too much.

But you were wrong on one point, I have been inside 2 masonic lodges... not many, but I have been in some. Of which I am very familiar with the interior of one, and the other was very nice... lots of hard wood and stuff.

But I will agree with you on one point...
Originally posted by Byrd
This is simply Good Architecture and a mural from a culture that you're obviously not familiar with.


I like the place, it looks neat! The murals, I am not so familiar with them or the culture, but they freak me out and wouldn't hang them on any wall I would look at. But that is just my personal opinion.

But there is a reason for every design. Just look at a corporate logo... those have more reasons for why they look like they do than anything I have ever encountered... so I believe that the DIA does have reasons for the patterns, shapes and designs beyond the fact that they look nice.

Otherwise, it could be NWO/Illuminati/Bilderberger/Bohemian Grove/Reptilian/Grey/Silly Putty symbology.

And please don't take this as a personal attack... but I am not just some hick posting junk on here just to create a stir. It is a forum for discussion... and I am discussing.

Whew... I hate long posts... sorry to everyone that reads this far.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>    ^^TOP^^



Leaked video of freemason-show.
  Posted 6 days ago with 37 member flags
The Templar Uprising
  Posted 18 days ago with 17 member flags
Jay-Z is Nicki Minaj?
  Posted 6 days ago with 11 member flags
The Three Ruffians
  Posted 15 days ago with 5 member flags
32nd level mason
  Posted 4 days ago with 4 member flags
The Hive Mind
  Posted 12 days ago with 2 member flags
A Transparent and Open Secretive Society devoted to Truth
  Posted 7 days ago with 2 member flags