It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by filosophia
the S&P is still giving the US a AA+ which is I think way too high in my opinion if they were more truthful the US would get a FFF- and that's not just me, a lot of other people agree the dollar is junk or at least a D- not a AA+
The political brinksmanship of recent months highlights what we see as America's governance and policymaking becoming less stable, less effective, and less predictable than what we previously believed. The statutory debt ceiling and the threat of default have become political bargaining chips in the debate over fiscal policy.
The outlook on the long-term rating is negative. As our downside alternate fiscal scenario illustrates, a higher public debt trajectory than we currently assume could lead us to lower the long-term rating again.
Oh goody, now we get to argue over sentence structure? Technically, since there were only 2 items in the series, a comma should not have been used at all. That being said, the sentence should be read as a series of items; to wit:
Originally posted by macman
Originally posted by sonofliberty1776
Funny, he doesn't blame Bush either.
Originally posted by HunkaHunka
reply to post by macman
Another non reader...
Asked who was to blame, Chambers said, "This is a problem that's been a long time in the making -- well over this administration, the prior administration."
He clearly states it's not because of Obama....
Prior means before.
Who was before Obama?
1. Use commas to separate items in a series. Place a comma after each item in the series except for the last item. Place the last comma before the coordinating conjunction. For example:
Dogs, cats, mice, and squirrels are mammals.
Farmers grow yellow corn, orange pumpkins, green peppers, and purple grapes.
The movie is long, dull, and overrated.
Performers sing, dance, or act.
www.standardandpoors.com...
‘AAA’—Extremely strong capacity to meet financial commitments. Highest Rating.
‘AA’—Very strong capacity to meet financial commitments.
‘A’—Strong capacity to meet financial commitments, but somewhat susceptible to adverse economic conditions and changes in circumstances.
‘BBB’—Adequate capacity to meet financial commitments, but more subject to adverse economic conditions.
‘BBB-‘—Considered lowest investment grade by market participants.
‘BB+’—Considered highest speculative grade by market participants.
‘BB’—Less vulnerable in the near-term but faces major ongoing uncertainties to adverse business, financial and economic conditions.
‘B’—More vulnerable to adverse business, financial and economic conditions but currently has the capacity to meet financial commitments.
‘CCC’—Currently vulnerable and dependent on favorable business, financial and economic conditions to meet financial commitments.
‘CC’—Currently highly vulnerable.
‘C’—Currently highly vulnerable obligations and other defined circumstances.
‘D’—Payment default on financial commitments.
Note: Ratings from ‘AA’ to ‘CCC’ may be modified by the addition of a plus (+) or minus (-) sign to show relative standing within the major rating categories.
So, one of these 2 is where we really sit imo.
‘B’—More vulnerable to adverse business, financial and economic conditions but currently has the capacity to meet financial commitments.
‘CCC’—Currently vulnerable and dependent on favorable business, financial and economic conditions to meet financial commitments.
Originally posted by newcovenant
reply to post by macman
If there wasn't all the unwanted attention regarding the debt ceiling we would have had an increase in our credit rating and borrowing power. Some say this is like a death knell but it is no worse than before...when you are already in this much debt, a couple trillion more hardly makes a ripple.
We might have had a little more world confidence and whether or not we could make good in it...the world would see we fully are responsible and can handle our debt.
This may not be true. But what good is pointing this out to our creditors. Why not do what everyone else does. Quietly move and change our phone numbers.
I say lighten up. The damage is already done.
Arguing with me won't repair it.
Originally posted by sonofliberty1776
Oh goody, now we get to argue over sentence structure? Technically, since there were only 2 items in the series, a comma should not have been used at all. That being said, the sentence should be read as a series of items; to wit:
Originally posted by macman
Originally posted by sonofliberty1776
Funny, he doesn't blame Bush either.
Originally posted by HunkaHunka
reply to post by macman
Another non reader...
Asked who was to blame, Chambers said, "This is a problem that's been a long time in the making -- well over this administration, the prior administration."
He clearly states it's not because of Obama....
Prior means before.
Who was before Obama?
1. Use commas to separate items in a series. Place a comma after each item in the series except for the last item. Place the last comma before the coordinating conjunction. For example:
Dogs, cats, mice, and squirrels are mammals.
Farmers grow yellow corn, orange pumpkins, green peppers, and purple grapes.
The movie is long, dull, and overrated.
Performers sing, dance, or act.
Thus, according to the admittedly poor structure of the sentence, the sentence should be read as:
"This is a problem that's been a long time in the making -- well over this administration and(possibly or) the prior administration. Will it be necessary for me to diagram the sentence for you?
Originally posted by angeldoll
reply to post by beezzer
No, it's not shallow, Beezer. It's the truth. Social Security was wiped out during the Bush administration, the funds were diverted after 911, and they were never replaced.
We got so far in over our heads during those eight years, they knew we would never get out.
I honestly to God believe sometime that they didn't rig the last election because they wanted a Democrat in, to try and clean up the mess they made.
The money was spent on everything from wars, to give-aways to other countries, trying to buy allies.
It was spent on everything but the citizens.
We cannot continue without raising taxes. "READ MY LIPS".
WE WILL HAVE TO RAISE TAXES. Any fool can see that.
The tea party members should be ashamed of themselves. They are having the exact opposite effect of what most of them really want, but are too ill informed to know better, and like everybody else, they don't know how to fix it.
We will have to raise taxes, period.
We can pay them now, or we can pay them later, but pay them, we must.
Originally posted by HunkaHunka
reply to post by sonofliberty1776
Nope... but he does blame the tax cuts... that originated in that admin.
He pointed to the decision by Congress about whether to extend the 2001 and 2003 tax cuts as one crucial area. "If you let them lapse for the high-income earners, that could give you another $950 billion," he said.
Originally posted by beezzer
reply to post by HunkaHunka
If the current administration had never spent they way they have, thn we'd not be in this mess in the first place.
Blaming republicans is a shallow and baseless argument.
Originally posted by beezzer
reply to post by HunkaHunka
I've done nothing but read about this issue. Focusing on increases in taxes is myopic at best. No one, apparently, has the stones to admit that this administrations keynesian spending tactcs have caused this.