It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Manhater
]And I really think that the debunker's shouldn't comment unless they have definitive proof to back up the photo or manipulate it in some fashion to prove that isn't a bug or a lantern or a bird......
A bright orb compared to ghostly orb is not proof of a camera malfunction nor is any proof of a Chinese Lantern, or dew spots or a ghost. I can tell the difference.
And being rude, kills the moment. Do us a favor and don't comment.
post by MainLineThis
Some might call it being rude, others might call it pointing out reality. I can understand how the ignorant can see reality as a rude thing, it often smacks them in the face repeatedly before they fully understand it.
post by MainLineThis
I don't expect an honest answer about that from you on that, your feathers are too ruffled and your pride is going to get in the way of you admitting I am 100% right (and you know I am).
post by MainLineThis
the continued and perpetual ignorance that makes us all look like idiots far too often?
But the quality of the UFO sightings that are generally reported on ATS is generally very depressing.
You keep using this argument , how does what someone else thinks or believes make us all look like idiots , and to who , nobody cares .
Originally posted by Manhater
But, I agree with you. I do think, something is up there per say but I'm not going to say its a UFO.
A bright orb compared to ghostly orb is not proof of a camera malfunction nor is any proof of a Chinese Lantern, or dew spots or a ghost. I can tell the difference.
And before you guys cry, the word ignorant is not an insult.