It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
USPS posts net loss of $5.7 billion for nine-month period
WASHINGTON — The U.S. Postal Service posted a net loss of $3.1 billion in its third quarter and warned again it would default on payments to the federal government if Congress did not step in.
The mail carrier, which does not get taxpayer funds, has struggled to overhaul its business as mail volumes fall. It has said personnel costs weigh heavily and is facing a massive retiree health benefit prepayment next month.
Not you but the quoted info is somewhat misleading, my ex wife is a postal carrier, and from what she says, only the carriers themselves are not paid from taxpayer funds. However, defaulting on loans from the fed government does in fact mean the tax payers are footing the bill, just on the back end.
Originally posted by KnightFire
The mail carrier, which does not get taxpayer funds, has struggled to overhaul its business as mail volumes fall. It has said personnel costs weigh heavily and is facing a massive retiree health benefit prepayment next month.
You can read the rest of the article by clicking the link below.
Link to Article
So here is my take on this. Since the U.S. Postal Service isn't funded by taxpayer dollars we the people have the responsibility to help them out. Okay, hear me out here because I have a plan that just might work if enough people take action and we will not pay one cent.
You know all those annoying credit card applications, insurance applications and so on that we receive in the mail? Of course you do. Well, each and everyone of them come with a pre-paid return envelope for you to send back your information. I've never seen anything that says we are not permitted to send back an empty envelope.
Originally posted by Swills
reply to post by KnightFire
I didn't know the Post Office didn't get tax payer funds? Really? I'd vote on a Post Office bailout before I'd bail out any Too Big to Fail Banks. Let them fail, they are fail, but we need our post office!edit on 5-8-2011 by Swills because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by NuroSlam
Not you but the quoted info is somewhat misleading, my ex wife is a postal carrier, and from what she says, only the carriers themselves are not paid from taxpayer funds. However, defaulting on loans from the fed government does in fact mean the tax payers are footing the bill, just on the back end.
Originally posted by KnightFire
The mail carrier, which does not get taxpayer funds, has struggled to overhaul its business as mail volumes fall. It has said personnel costs weigh heavily and is facing a massive retiree health benefit prepayment next month.
You can read the rest of the article by clicking the link below.
Link to Article
So here is my take on this. Since the U.S. Postal Service isn't funded by taxpayer dollars we the people have the responsibility to help them out. Okay, hear me out here because I have a plan that just might work if enough people take action and we will not pay one cent.
You know all those annoying credit card applications, insurance applications and so on that we receive in the mail? Of course you do. Well, each and everyone of them come with a pre-paid return envelope for you to send back your information. I've never seen anything that says we are not permitted to send back an empty envelope.
Again, the ex does much the same thing, she orders catalogue after catalogue, I personally get about 15 different ones that she has ordered in my name for my daughter to enjoy browsing when she is here.
They are not worth 20 dollars an hour....
Originally posted by liejunkie01
reply to post by hillynilly
They are not worth 20 dollars an hour....
I believe that that is their starting wage. It is more in the $30 an hour range.
A friend of mine works for the PO and he started at 18 something an hour.....That is Starting
There are always several supervisors standing around our post office. I know because I worked at the local news paper and delivered the mail papers almost daily. 2 or 3 people making $40 an hour to stand around is bad business. They could trim costs by cutting wages a hair and eliminate a few positions.
I do not feel sorry for their poor business practices..
Originally posted by getreadyalready
reply to post by Swills
I like their shipping costs, they are a little better than FedEx or UPS in my opinion, but that is probably why they are failing.
Sure, people will lose their jobs, and those people will be the innovators that fill the void when this business fails.
Originally posted by rebeldog
do we really need mail delivered 6 days a week?
couldn't half of employees be sufficient and each address get mail twice a week?
Originally posted by system.robot
Great idea sending in postage paid envelopes.
I would take it a step further and glue the envelope to a brick,
Or some other heavy object. Isn't the postage paid by weight?
Perhaps if these companies get enough bricks they will take your name off if the junkmail list
Just a thought.