It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
If elections really made a difference, they would be illegal.
Originally posted by mpacc
reply to post by Chance321
I always was suprised Dr. Savage was not mentioned on this board much more often. I think he is by far the most truthful person on the radio. If you listen to the show enough hell tell you his real opionions on how the governement is just a horse and pony show and is fixed. I mean he was the only one who reported about the CEOs with obama to Brazil
JEFFREY R. IMMELT - CEO, GENERAL ELECTRIC Immelt will retain his post at G.E. while becoming "chairman of the Council on Jobs and Competitiveness, a newly named panel that President Obama is creating by executive order." Wonder what hell recommand no taxes for GE again and tax rebates for new Green technology
ARIS CANDRIS - CEO, WESTINGHOUSE
JAMES T. HACKETT – CEO, ANADARKO PETROLEUM CORP He currently serves as a director of Fluor Corporation, Halliburton Company and The Welch Foundation.
JOHN V. FARACI – CEO, INTERNATIONAL PAPER
ANTHONY S. HARRINGTON – CEO, ALBRIGHT STONEBRIDGE GROUP
Busy in brazil looting america
DR. Savage is not owned by the left or the right unlike all the other BS on MSM
Originally posted by whaaa
I don't think Ron Paul wants to be a serious contender. Gov pretty hair Perry has a plan to win favor of the evangelicals as evidenced by his prayer meeting in Houston. And whether you believe it or not; the conservative Christians are a force in American politics and Dr. Paul will need them if he is serious. Without them he won't win a nomination even by the TPM.
However I would like to see RP run as a third party candidate just to give the GOP and their corporate masters a lesson but I can't take RP seriously until he puts together a team and starts a viable campaign.
This next election cycle should be very entertaining. I hope exgov. Palin can find a niche in there as she is alway a Hot property and good for a wtf moment. But whoever is elected the ptb will set them right with the program and nothing will change. If elections really made a difference, they would be illegal.edit on 5-8-2011 by whaaa because: (no reason given)
Well, I have a few questions for you, has the repubs or the dems been any better? and who exactly is the libertarian?
Originally posted by simone50m
So is trolling here, expressing my view that I think Michael Savage is evil, and that a Libertarian is wrong for this country?
Originally posted by simone50m
So is trolling here, expressing my view that I think Michael Savage is evil, and that a Libertarian is wrong for this country?
Originally posted by simone50m
reply to post by NuroSlam
The Lib I was referring to is Paul. There were some aspects I was liking about him, but if he were to be elected and stick to Libertarian/Republican ideals, social safety nets would be slated for the dumpster, which -in my own view- is crazy and dangerous.
He wasnt defending them, he was applying the constitution to the idea of enforcement. While you may think it should be handled federally, there is no powers for the federal government to do it. So it must be handled by the states. I personally feel someone who does that should be taken out back and curb stomped. but it is not the federal governments job to do that.
Plus, I never got over the fact that he was defending of animal crush videos,
(Okay, I heard youall, each state's rights to deal with that how they will, which I disagree, rather, think should be established universally the same like first degree murder.)
So you don't believe the constitution should be followed is what I am getting from your post
My problem with Democrats is they were never true progressives. Populists FOR the American people, and against endless wars-of-aggression and pandering to big corporate lobbyists and bailing out untrustworthy too-big-2-fail financial institutions. Bill Clinton was TERRIBLE scary, for a long list of fascistic reasons.
I just want someone populist with common sense who does NOT think that if you are disabled, elderly, orphaned, widowed, ill, or fallen on hard times, that you should die in the street if you cannot pull yourself up by your own bootstraps.
I don't know if a view like that is more insane than it is wicked, or more wicked than it is insane