It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by SirClem
reply to post by Kitilani
The point is not whether YOU were aroused or titillated. That is not how you define exploitation.
At the risk of sounding like an old person, it doesn't stop here. Just wait, the boys are next. It's coming.
Copy and paste my comments. If they will exploit kids, they will stop at nothing to make a profit.
Originally posted by SirClem
reply to post by Kitilani
I could tell you that you are blind. I am here to tell you. You are blind. That is who I am, since you ask.
Scroll back? I see boys in underwear in a youtube video, perhaps having fun. What do you see?
Some of you kill me.
I tell you what, show me your definition of exploitation of a child in a youtube video, I am sure you can, and I will bet this girl made more money for her mommy and daddy.
And her "career". You miss the point, blind man.
Originally posted by jerryznv
The parents of this young girl should be on trial!
Welcome to America!!!
Originally posted by SirClem
reply to post by Kitilani
YOU posted the boys in underwear. And, the other link that doesn't work.
All as a rebuttal to what? My simple premise that my example is exploitation of a child.
My posts may be a riddle, perhaps above some people's heads, but I have been VERY clear.
This is exploitation of a child, it is provocative, and meant to be so.
If you can't see it, perhaps there is something wrong with YOU.
I am prepared to debate that point.